The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 160 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Campgest shines .
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 160 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 160 |
After analyzing 160 verified reviews, Campgest users most value its , while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Campgest |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel involves balancing features, usability, support, and cost. Campgest and Preno both aim to streamline operations but target different hotel segments and operational needs. While Campgest primarily caters to outdoor hospitality venues like campgrounds and RV parks, Preno is built for hoteliers managing both small and large hotels with a focus on ease of use and integration. Your decision hinges on which platform aligns best with your hotel type and operational priorities.
Campgest offers an all-in-one management solution with a focus on outdoor hospitality, whereas Preno boasts extensive features designed for hotel operations, including integrations with major booking and accounting tools. The key question: do you need a niche campground management tool or a broad hotel PMS with advanced capabilities?
Campgest and Preno serve different hospitality sectors, influencing their core strengths. Campgest’s platform simplifies campground and outdoor venue management, providing automated booking and real-time availability updates, but it lacks a broad feature set or integrations seen in Preno. In contrast, Preno offers a highly-rated user experience, with a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 144 recent reviews, reflecting strong user confidence.
Preno’s high recent review count and 95% likelihood to recommend indicate it’s the more trusted choice for hoteliers today. Campgest, with no recent reviews or extensive features, is more suited for specialized outdoor operations. Would your hotel benefit more from a specialized outdoor management tool or a comprehensive hotel PMS?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cloud-based system with a user-friendly interface, Preno is the clear pick. Its 4.78/5 ease of use score, combined with 17 verified integrations—including Xero, SiteMinder, and Revinate—makes it ideal for hotels seeking a seamless, connected platform.
Campgest might appeal if you manage a campground, RV park, or outdoor hospitality venue needing reservation automation and real-time updates. However, for traditional hotels, Preno’s 30+ features, including payment processing, booking engine, and revenue management, make it the more comprehensive choice. If operational simplicity and integration are priorities, go with Preno; if niche outdoor management is your focus, Campgest could suffice.
Preno’s intuitive interface, rated 4.78/5 by users, makes onboarding and staff adoption straightforward. Several reviews highlight its ease of navigating bookings, billing, and reporting, with users praising the friendly support team during setup.
Campgest, with no current ratings or reviews, offers limited information, but its focus on outdoor management suggests a simpler interface tailored for campground staff. Given the lack of recent reviews and detailed usability data, Preno’s usability edge is clear. Edge: Preno.
Preno offers 30 features including payment processing, calendar views, guest CRM, revenue management, and integrations with tools like Xero and SiteMinder. Its extensive feature set supports multi-property management, automation, and revenue optimization, making it suitable for hotels with complex operations.
Campgest provides no detailed features beyond basic reservation and management tools tailored for outdoor hospitality. For hotels requiring advanced functionalities like dynamic pricing, group management, or integrated EPoS, Preno’s broader feature set clearly surpasses Campgest. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s support team scores 4.8/5 and is frequently praised for responsiveness and helpfulness, with reviews emphasizing smooth onboarding and ongoing assistance. Many users comment that Preno’s team actively listens and implements requested features.
Campgest, with no recent reviews or support ratings available, cannot match Preno’s established support reputation. For hotels prioritizing reliable support, Preno’s track record is a significant advantage. Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners, including major channel managers (SiteMinder), accounting software (Xero), and guest feedback tools (TrustYou). These integrations facilitate streamlined operations and better data flow across your systems.
Campgest, lacking verified integrations, limits its utility for hotels that rely on multiple connected tools. If your hotel depends on a robust tech ecosystem, Preno’s integration count and quality offer a clear benefit. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s recent reviews consistently rate it above 4.7/5, with hoteliers praising its ease of use, support, and feature set. Its 144 reviews in the last six months and a 95% recommendation rate underscore high satisfaction among hotel users.
Campgest has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction reliably. Given the current data, Preno’s higher ratings and recent feedback strongly favor its reputation. Edge: Preno.
Campgest does not publicly list pricing, suggesting a bespoke quote or a different model. Preno charges $800/month, with no free tier or trial, positioning it as a mid-range investment for hotel management.
Without detailed Campgest pricing, a direct comparison isn’t possible. However, Preno’s transparent pricing and extensive feature set indicate a focus on value for hotels seeking a comprehensive solution.
Campgest is best suited for outdoor hospitality venues looking for basic management tools, not for full-service hotels.
Preno is ideal for hotels aiming for a scalable, integrated property management experience.
The core difference lies in target markets: Preno is designed for hoteliers needing an all-in-one, feature-rich PMS, while Campgest caters to outdoor hospitality venues with basic reservation needs. Preno’s extensive recent reviews, high user ratings, and wide integrations present a compelling case for traditional hotels.
If your hotel values a platform with proven support, numerous features, and seamless integrations, Preno is your logical choice. Campgest might suffice if you operate a campground or outdoor venue and want a simple, reservation-focused system.
Choosing Preno will likely improve your operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue management, especially if you prioritize scalability and integration. Conversely, Campgest could serve niche outdoor venues better if your needs remain simple and specialized.
In summary:
Ultimately, your choice depends on your hotel’s operational complexity and growth plans, but for most traditional hoteliers, Preno’s recent user feedback and feature set make it the more dependable option.
According to HTR's product database, Campgest and Preno share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Campgest and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Campgest offers 0 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Campgest: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Campgest has an HT Score of 0 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor