The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Caspeco shines .
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 57 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Caspeco users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing between Caspeco PMS by Caspeco and Counter by Counter hinges on your property's specific needs and operational scope. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve different hotel segments and maturity levels.
Caspeco offers an all-in-one system with integrated reservations, housekeeping, and billing, primarily targeting larger hotels and resorts. Counter, however, is designed for hostels and small properties, emphasizing ease of use and affordability with a broad feature set. Which solution aligns better with your current hotel operations?
Caspeco and Counter both solve core property management challenges like reservations, guest management, and billing but diverge significantly in their scope and user base. Caspeco, with its comprehensive feature suite, is tailored for hotels seeking a unified platform to handle complex operations, automations, and reporting. Counter’s focus is on agility, simplicity, and affordability, making it ideal for hostels and small hotels that prioritize ease of use and quick onboarding.
Where do your hotel's operational complexity and growth plans align? Does your team need a scalable system with advanced features, or a straightforward one that allows quick management? The answer will guide your choice.
If your hotel requires an extensive, integrated PMS that manages reservations, housekeeping, invoicing, and detailed analytics, Caspeco is the better fit. Its robust platform is more suitable for mid-to-large properties that need automation and multi-department coordination.
Conversely, if your property is a hostel or small boutique looking for a cost-effective, easy-to-learn system with essential features like reservations, basic billing, and mobile management, Counter is the ideal choice. Its strong support and user-friendly interface appeal to operators prioritizing simplicity over complexity.
Your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth trajectory will determine whether you should invest in Caspeco's comprehensive system or adopt Counter’s streamlined approach.
Counter scores highly for ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating from users who praise its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile-friendly design. Hoteliers often mention how staff can learn the system rapidly and adapt without extensive training, citing positive feedback like, "It’s clear, simple, and easy to understand."
Caspeco, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating for ease of use, indicating significant usability issues or lack of recent positive reviews. Its interface is reportedly less intuitive, which might hinder staff adoption and require more extensive training.
Edge: Counter.
Counter provides a broad suite of 19 features not present in Caspeco, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, housekeeper modules, guest CRM, multi-currency, and multi-lingual support. It supports seamless integrations with popular platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, and Goki, offering flexibility and automation.
Caspeco offers only core property management functionalities without the extended feature set Counter provides. Its lack of integrations and specialized modules makes it less adaptable for modern, multi-channel operations.
Edge: Counter.
Counter scores a near-perfect 4.96/5 based on recent reviews, with hoteliers praising its quick, helpful, and accessible support. Testimonials highlight responsiveness, with staff like Evelyn and Max receiving repeated praise for professionalism and problem-solving.
Caspeco’s support rating is unrecorded, with no recent reviews available, suggesting limited recent user feedback or engagement. Its support experience cannot be confidently assessed, but the lack of recent reviews weakens its credibility.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers seven verified integrations, including Stripe for payments, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Goki, and others. These integrations support revenue automation, channel management, and access control, helping streamline operations.
Caspeco currently has no verified integrations, limiting its capacity to connect with other hotel technology systems. For properties relying on third-party tools, Counter’s integrations are a significant advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter's overall rating of 4.73/5 is based on 54 recent reviews, mainly from hostel operators and small properties. Hoteliers highlight its ease of use, support, and automation features.
Caspeco has no recent reviews or ratings, preventing a meaningful comparison. Its lack of recent feedback suggests limited user satisfaction or engagement, making Counter the more trusted option.
Edge: Counter.
Caspeco does not disclose specific pricing details, indicating it may require custom quotes or be tailored for larger hotel clients. Its absence of a freemium or transparent pricing model suggests it targets established properties with bigger budgets.
Counter is also not explicitly priced but emphasizes no implementation fee, and its free usability for hostels suggests affordability. Its transparent approach and multiple features at no initial cost make it attractive for small and startup properties.
Given the lack of concrete prices, both products likely require direct inquiries, but Counter’s free model for hostels provides budget-friendly appeal.
Hotels that should consider Caspeco are:
Not ideal if:
Caspeco is best for hotels with complex operational demands and resources to implement a comprehensive PMS.
Counter is suited for:
Not ideal if:
Counter excels for lean operations that value ease, mobility, and essential features.
Caspeco offers a comprehensive, scalable platform suited for hotels with complex needs, focusing on automation, detailed reporting, and multi-department management. Its lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes its current usability and support less certain.
Counter, with its high reviews, ease of use, and broad feature set tailored to hostels and small hotels, stands out as the more reliable choice today. Its continuous support and multiple integrations make it ideal for budget-conscious properties seeking straightforward management.
If your hotel requires a full-featured, scalable PMS with robust integrations and advanced automation, Caspeco might be worth exploring further. However, for most small to mid-sized properties or hostels prioritizing simplicity and support, Counter remains the recommended option.
Ultimately, your decision should align with your property size, operational complexity, and growth plans. Based on current reviews and recent user feedback, Counter's strength in usability and support makes it the clearer choice for most hoteliers now.
According to HTR's product database, Caspeco PMS and Counter share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Caspeco PMS and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Caspeco PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Caspeco PMS: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Caspeco has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor