The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 46 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ChargeAutomation shines when it comes to payment processing , with exclusive features like GlobalPayments (Credit Card Processing).
Hoteza shines in onboarding .
Side-by-side ratings based on 46 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 44 | 2 |
After analyzing 46 verified reviews, ChargeAutomation users most value its payment processing, contactless check-in, customer support, while Hoteza users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Payment Processing
▾
|
|
|
+
Contactless Check-in
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Customer Reviews
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 13 reviews | #20 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 16 reviews | #11 2 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #6 5 reviews | #22 0 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 1 reviews | #9 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 9 reviews | #12 2 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #10 6 reviews | #12 1 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #9 4 reviews | #16 0 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 18 reviews | #17 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #4 19 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #6 20 reviews | #11 1 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #5 2 reviews | #8 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #6 0 reviews |
Both ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and Hoteza Check-In aim to simplify contactless guest arrivals, reduce manual work, and enhance guest experiences. ChargeAutomation offers a comprehensive platform with extensive automation features, while Hoteza emphasizes ease of use and seamless PMS integration. Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize feature depth and regional presence or user-friendliness and recent reviews.
ChargeAutomation’s strengths lie in its automation capabilities and broad feature set, but it lacks recent reviews, which might impact confidence. Conversely, Hoteza boasts recent positive feedback, especially around usability, but has a smaller review base. Which solution aligns with your hotel’s strategic goals?
ChargeAutomation and Hoteza both target contactless check-in but diverge significantly in execution. ChargeAutomation offers a feature-rich, automated platform that handles ID verification, payments, and upselling, designed to streamline operations and boost revenue. Hoteza, on the other hand, provides a mobile-friendly, app-free experience that simplifies arrival procedures and reduces front-desk congestion.
ChargeAutomation’s review count (42) is much higher, with recent zero reviews, indicating a potential stagnation or limited recent customer feedback. Hoteza’s single recent review suggests current active user engagement, making its performance more relevant now. If your hotel needs extensive automation and revenue tools, ChargeAutomation is appealing. If ease, speed, and recent positive reviews matter more, Hoteza might be preferable.
If your hotel requires advanced automation, comprehensive document handling, and revenue-enhancing upsell features, ChargeAutomation is the better fit. Its 20 shared features and unique offerings like PCI compliance, multi-processor gateways, and PMS integration demonstrate its depth, especially if your hotel operates across multiple regions.
For hotels that prioritize ease of use, quick onboarding, and proven recent satisfaction, Hoteza’s 5/5 ease-of-use rating and recent positive review make it the clear choice. Its simple, app-free guest interface and seamless PMS integration are ideal for properties seeking fast, reliable check-in without the complexity of extensive automation.
ChargeAutomation boasts a 4.71/5 ease-of-use rating based on 42 reviews, with users praising its user-friendly interface and straightforward processes. However, some mention a learning curve and wish for more customizable interfaces, especially in PMS synchronization.
Hoteza scores a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, supported by recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive, web-based design that guests find simple to navigate. Its onboarding process is reported to be smooth, and staff adoption is quick thanks to straightforward workflows.
Edge: Hoteza. Its recent reviews and perfect ease rating underscore its superior user experience and faster adoption.
ChargeAutomation leads in feature count with 20 shared features plus 10 exclusive ones, such as PCI compliance, credit card processing gateways, and PMS integration. Its unique capabilities support automating security deposits, upselling, and document collection at scale, offering a robust solution for complex hotel operations.
Hoteza, in contrast, provides core contactless check-in features and customization options like multilingual support, digital signatures, and tailored upsell offers. While it covers essential guest arrival needs effectively, it does not have the extensive feature set of ChargeAutomation.
Edge: ChargeAutomation. Its broader and more advanced feature suite makes it suitable for hotels with complex operational requirements.
ChargeAutomation’s support team scores a 4.9/5, with reviewers praising its prompt, friendly, and knowledgeable assistance. One review highlights the quick response times and proactive support, which is critical for resolving technical issues swiftly.
Hoteza also maintains a perfect 5/5 support rating, with recent reviews emphasizing reliable, real-time support that ensures smooth operations. Both vendors are highly rated, but ChargeAutomation’s slightly larger user base and ongoing positive feedback tip the scale.
Edge: ChargeAutomation. Its slightly higher support rating and proven responsiveness provide more confidence in handling potential issues.
ChargeAutomation integrates with 18 verified partners, including major players like RoomRaccoon, ChargeAutomation (itself), and HOTELTIME. Hoteza connects with 20 verified partners, including industry leaders like Oracle Hospitality, Stripe, and Vingcard.
Shared partners include Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Stripe, but Hoteza’s broader integration network and partnerships with key industry software give it a slight edge. This flexibility facilitates smoother data flow and operational consistency.
Edge: Hoteza. Its slightly larger and more diverse integration network supports a wider range of hotel tech ecosystems.
ChargeAutomation’s review count (42) and recent absence of reviews make current ratings less indicative of its standing. Its overall satisfaction appears strong based on initial feedback, but no recent data limits confidence.
Hoteza, with just 2 reviews but recent positive feedback, earns a 5/5 user rating from hoteliers praising its ease of use and support. For current, live feedback, Hoteza’s recent reviews provide more reliable insight.
Edge: Hoteza. Its recent reviews and perfect ratings make it the more dependable choice for current user satisfaction.
ChargeAutomation’s pricing starts at $200 monthly, with no upfront implementation fee, and no trial or freemium options. Hoteza’s base price is $600, also without trial or freemium, reflecting its more comprehensive service.
While ChargeAutomation is more budget-friendly and flexible, it lacks free trials for testing before commitment. Hoteza’s higher entry cost aligns with its streamlined, easy-to-use platform.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, quick setup or has minimal automation needs. Smaller boutique hotels or properties prioritizing ease over advanced features may find ChargeAutomation overly complex.
Not ideal if your hotel requires complex automation, extensive upselling capabilities, or PCI-level security features. Smaller properties or those new to digital check-in may prefer Hoteza’s simplicity.
ChargeAutomation offers a broad, automation-heavy platform designed for hotels seeking to maximize operational efficiency and revenue. Its extensive feature set, integration options, and support for complex property types make it suitable for larger, tech-savvy hotels with diverse needs.
Hoteza, by contrast, excels in ease of use, recent positive reviews, and seamless PMS integration, making it a smart pick for hotels prioritizing guest convenience and quick implementation. Its straightforward approach suits properties that want reliable, modern contactless check-in without the complexity.
If automation and revenue enhancement are your priorities, ChargeAutomation is the clear choice. For hotels that value simplicity, recent positive feedback, and fast setup, Hoteza provides a compelling alternative.
Contactless Check-in pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and Hoteza Check-In share 20 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Chase (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| First Data (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Heartland (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Multi-Processor Gateway | ||
| PCI Compliance | ||
| Vantiv (Credit Card Processing) |
What hoteliers love
The software's automated payment processing feature is praised for handling payments, security deposits, and chargebacks. Users appreciate how it mini... The software's automated payment processing feature is praised for handling payments, security deposits, and chargebacks. Users appreciate how it minimizes fraud and error, saving time and reducing labor costs. Payment automation facilitates smoother operations and enhances financial security for both hotels and guests.
ChargeAutomation simplifies the check-in process with its robust contactless solution. Reviews frequently highlight how the system allows guests to co... ChargeAutomation simplifies the check-in process with its robust contactless solution. Reviews frequently highlight how the system allows guests to complete check-in remotely, reducing front desk traffic and wait times. This feature is especially beneficial in minimizing manual work, improving operational efficiency, and creating a better guest experience.
While support is generally praised for being responsive and helpful, a few reviews noted the need for improvements in response time and additional sup... While support is generally praised for being responsive and helpful, a few reviews noted the need for improvements in response time and additional support personnel. Good support is crucial for resolving issues quickly, thereby affecting the overall experience.
Where hoteliers push back
A critical point raised by some users is the need for more customization options. Reviews mention limitations in the ability to customize the guest po... A critical point raised by some users is the need for more customization options. Reviews mention limitations in the ability to customize the guest portal, email formats, and other interfaces. This lack of flexibility can impact how well the software meets specific needs of different properties.
Although several reviews highlight how ChargeAutomation seamlessly integrates with Property Management Systems (PMS), there are also some criticisms a... Although several reviews highlight how ChargeAutomation seamlessly integrates with Property Management Systems (PMS), there are also some criticisms about its PMS connectivity. Users report issues like synchrony problems and the need for more flexible information transfer capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and Hoteza Check-In share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in offers 18 verified integration partners, while Hoteza Check-In offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Hoteza Check-In leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ChargeAutomation Online Check-in: No. Hoteza Check-In: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ChargeAutomation has an HT Score of 24 and Hoteza has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor