The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 127 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ChargeAutomation shines when it comes to payment processing , with exclusive features like GlobalPayments (Credit Card Processing) and Hotel Website Check-in Portal.
straiv shines when it comes to digital check-in and check-out , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
Side-by-side ratings based on 127 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 44 | 83 |
After analyzing 127 verified reviews, ChargeAutomation users most value its payment processing, contactless check-in, customer support, while straiv users highlight digital check-in and check-out, guest communication and customization, ease of implementation and use. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Payment Processing
▾
|
+
Digital check-in and check-out
▾
|
|
+
Contactless Check-in
▾
|
+
Guest communication and customization
▾
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
+
Ease of implementation and use
▾
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
+
Continuous improvement and updates
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Limitations
▾
|
−
Payment process issues
▾
|
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Customer Reviews
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 13 reviews | #3 27 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 16 reviews | #3 41 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #6 5 reviews | #5 8 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #13 1 reviews | #5 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 9 reviews | #3 28 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #10 6 reviews | #9 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 4 reviews | #3 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 18 reviews | #4 18 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #4 19 reviews | #16 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #6 20 reviews | #2 79 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #5 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and straiv hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both address contactless check-in, but they differ significantly in features, ease of use, and market presence. ChargeAutomation offers a comprehensive, all-in-one platform with a strong focus on automation, while straiv emphasizes smooth digital guest journeys, especially suited for properties aiming for seamless contactless interactions. Which aligns better with your hotel’s guest experience goals?
ChargeAutomation is designed to automate pre-arrival guest verification, payments, and upselling, aiming to reduce manual work and increase revenue. straiv, on the other hand, offers a broader suite of contactless services like messaging, digital concierge, and check-in/out, focusing on enhancing guest experience through simplicity and speed.
ChargeAutomation’s strengths lie in its extensive automation features—ID collection, secure payments, and security deposits—which appeal to hotels prioritizing operational efficiency. straiv excels in creating a flexible, guest-centric experience without requiring app downloads, making it ideal for properties emphasizing guest convenience and contactless interactions.
Both are contactless solutions, but ChargeAutomation’s more comprehensive feature set and recent reviews suggest it is better suited for hotels seeking automation-driven workflows. Do you prioritize automation or guest engagement?
If your hotel needs full automation of check-in, payment, and upselling processes, go with ChargeAutomation. It’s especially suited for vacation rentals, serviced apartments, or hotels with high guest volume that want to automate repetitive tasks and boost revenue.
If your focus is on providing a quick, easy, and contactless guest experience with minimal IT complexity, straiv is the better pick. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, B&Bs, or limited-service properties that want to streamline operations while maintaining a high-quality guest journey.
Hotels that require a highly customizable, feature-rich platform with extensive integration options should lean toward ChargeAutomation. Conversely, if you seek a simple, intuitive interface with strong support and rapid deployment, straiv is preferable.
ChargeAutomation enjoys a high ease-of-use rating of 4.71/5, with many reviews citing its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Users mention that its setup can be straightforward, though some desire more flexibility in toggling accounts and interface customization.
straiv also scores 4.69/5, with reviews highlighting its user-friendly design, quick implementation, and minimal learning curve. Guests and staff find the platform straightforward, with some noting minor interface sluggishness.
Edge: ChargeAutomation, given its slightly higher review count and recent positive feedback emphasizing ease of use in automation workflows.
ChargeAutomation offers 21 features exclusive to its platform, including PCI compliance, multiple payment processors, document scanning, e-signatures, custom questions, and automation of deposits and pre-registration info. These features cater to thorough automation and security needs, making it more versatile for complex operations.
straiv provides 10 unique features, such as mobile check-in/out, guest messaging, digital concierge, room service ordering, and guest profiles—focused on enhancing the guest journey and operational speed.
ChargeAutomation clearly has more advanced automation and security features, while straiv emphasizes guest communication and contactless convenience. Which feature set aligns better with your operational goals?
Edge: ChargeAutomation, due to its broader and more specialized feature set tailored for automation and security.
ChargeAutomation is highly rated at 4.9/5, with reviews praising its rapid, friendly support and proactive assistance. Users mention that support responsiveness and problem resolution are key strengths, essential for troubleshooting automation workflows.
straiv scores 4.72/5, with positive feedback on its support team’s professionalism and responsiveness. However, some reviews suggest occasional delays in responses, especially when handling complex integrations.
Edge: ChargeAutomation, as recent reviews underscore its superior support quality and quick issue resolution.
ChargeAutomation connects with 18 verified partners, including Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and several payment processors. Its integrations span PMS, payment gateways, and other essential hotel tech, but it has fewer partners overall.
straiv integrates with 36 verified partners, including Oracle Suite 8, Protel, and SALTO Systems, offering broader compatibility with various hotel systems and hardware. Its extensive integrations can streamline data flow and automate many processes.
Edge: straiv, with nearly double the verified integration partners, making it more adaptable across diverse hotel tech stacks.
ChargeAutomation has a lower overall rating of 0/5 from 42 reviews, with no recent reviews in the last six months, indicating limited recent feedback. Many users express dissatisfaction or have not provided detailed feedback, reflecting a weaker market presence.
straiv, with 81 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.81/5, is highly rated across hotel segments, especially independent and boutique properties. Hotels appreciate its ease of use, guest experience enhancements, and continuous updates.
Edge: straiv, given its higher rating, more recent reviews, and broader positive reception.
ChargeAutomation is priced at a $200 monthly flat fee without a trial or freemium options, making it transparent but potentially costly for small properties.
straiv costs $500 per month, with no trial or freemium, reflecting its broader feature set and integration capabilities.
Both are subscription-based, but ChargeAutomation’s lower price might appeal to smaller hotels prioritizing automation. However, pricing could be justified for straiv’s extended features and integrations if your hotel values those.
Not ideal if your hotel requires broad guest engagement features like messaging or concierge services.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive automation, detailed security features, or advanced payment processing.
ChargeAutomation is a robust automation tool that automates check-in, payments, and upselling, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational efficiency. Its extensive features and integrations support complex workflows, but the lower recent review volume suggests a need for cautious evaluation.
straiv excels in delivering a smooth, guest-centric experience with strong support and broad integrations, making it well-suited for properties emphasizing guest satisfaction and ease of use. Its high ratings and recent reviews position it as the more reliable, well-regarded choice.
If your hotel’s priority is automation and security, select ChargeAutomation for its comprehensive feature set. For a focus on guest experience, contactless convenience, and proven market presence, straiv is the stronger option.
In conclusion, your decision should hinge on whether operational automation or guest engagement is your priority. Both platforms have their strengths, but straiv’s recent high ratings and broader integration network make it the clearer choice for most hotels today.
Contactless Check-in pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and straiv share 9 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Chase (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| First Data (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Heartland (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Local Recommendations | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Mobile Checkout | ||
| Multi-Processor Gateway | ||
| PCI Compliance | ||
| Room Service Ordering | ||
| Vantiv (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Web-app |
Showing top differences. 19 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
The software's automated payment processing feature is praised for handling payments, security deposits, and chargebacks. Users appreciate how it mini... The software's automated payment processing feature is praised for handling payments, security deposits, and chargebacks. Users appreciate how it minimizes fraud and error, saving time and reducing labor costs. Payment automation facilitates smoother operations and enhances financial security for both hotels and guests.
ChargeAutomation simplifies the check-in process with its robust contactless solution. Reviews frequently highlight how the system allows guests to co... ChargeAutomation simplifies the check-in process with its robust contactless solution. Reviews frequently highlight how the system allows guests to complete check-in remotely, reducing front desk traffic and wait times. This feature is especially beneficial in minimizing manual work, improving operational efficiency, and creating a better guest experience.
While support is generally praised for being responsive and helpful, a few reviews noted the need for improvements in response time and additional sup... While support is generally praised for being responsive and helpful, a few reviews noted the need for improvements in response time and additional support personnel. Good support is crucial for resolving issues quickly, thereby affecting the overall experience.
Where hoteliers push back
A critical point raised by some users is the need for more customization options. Reviews mention limitations in the ability to customize the guest po... A critical point raised by some users is the need for more customization options. Reviews mention limitations in the ability to customize the guest portal, email formats, and other interfaces. This lack of flexibility can impact how well the software meets specific needs of different properties.
Although several reviews highlight how ChargeAutomation seamlessly integrates with Property Management Systems (PMS), there are also some criticisms a... Although several reviews highlight how ChargeAutomation seamlessly integrates with Property Management Systems (PMS), there are also some criticisms about its PMS connectivity. Users report issues like synchrony problems and the need for more flexible information transfer capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Digital check-in and check-out are praised for significantly reducing waiting times for guests and administrative burdens for staff. Reviews emphasize... Digital check-in and check-out are praised for significantly reducing waiting times for guests and administrative burdens for staff. Reviews emphasize the benefits of contactless processes, especially during the COVID-19 era, providing guests with seamless and flexible arrivals and departures, while ensuring compliance with health safety protocols.
Users appreciate the ability to communicate directly with guests through journey mailing and other customizable modules. This facilitates timely infor... Users appreciate the ability to communicate directly with guests through journey mailing and other customizable modules. This facilitates timely information exchange, promotional offers, and enhances overall guest satisfaction. Reviews laud the flexibility in designing guest interactions based on individual hotel needs.
Straiv receives high marks for the ease with which its system can be implemented, requiring no advanced IT skills. Reviews consistently mention the to... Straiv receives high marks for the ease with which its system can be implemented, requiring no advanced IT skills. Reviews consistently mention the tool's intuitive user interface, making it easy for both staff and guests to interact with the system.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users report issues with the payment processing feature, such as delays and incomplete data transfers. Improvements in integrating multiple payme... Some users report issues with the payment processing feature, such as delays and incomplete data transfers. Improvements in integrating multiple payment gateways are suggested to enhance efficiency and reliability.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and straiv share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in offers 18 verified integration partners, while straiv offers 37. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ChargeAutomation Online Check-in: No. straiv: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ChargeAutomation has an HT Score of 24 and straiv has 73. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor