The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Ciaobooking shines .
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 322 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 322 |
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, Ciaobooking users most value its , while RMS users highlight technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 147 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #11 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #13 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #9 50 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 65 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #11 63 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #23 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #12 10 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. You’re evaluating Ciaobooking and RMS, two systems that promise to streamline tasks but differ significantly in scope, user feedback, and feature depth. While Ciaobooking appears less established and lacks recent reviews, RMS boasts a large user base and extensive functionality. Which platform aligns best with your hotel’s current needs and future growth plans?
Ciaobooking aims to simplify hotel management with a straightforward approach but offers no verified integration partners, limiting its connectivity and scalability. RMS, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive suite of 74 features, including channel management, booking engine, and revenue tools, supported by 112 verified integrations—making it suitable for properties seeking deep operational control.
Both systems target hotels looking to improve booking and guest management; however, RMS’s broad feature set and recent, abundant reviews (20 in the last six months) suggest it’s more mature and trusted. Ciaobooking’s lack of recent reviews and zero user ratings indicate less confidence in its current performance. Are you ready to prioritize proven reliability over simplicity?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform with a proven track record, RMS is the clear choice. Its extensive functionalities—like integrated CRS, payment processing, and guest CRM—serve mid-sized to large hotels or multi-property groups aiming for efficiency, automation, and growth.
Conversely, if your hotel operates on a tight budget or prefers a basic system without the need for integrations or advanced features, Ciaobooking might seem appealing. But with no recent reviews or detailed user feedback, RMS’s more comprehensive support and proven track record make it the safer, more reliable pick for most hoteliers looking to grow.
RMS earns a high ease-of-use rating of 4.28/5, supported by reviews highlighting its user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and helpful support team. Customers praise its straightforward booking chart and intuitive workflows, making staff adoption smoother—particularly for teams familiar with traditional PMS.
Ciaobooking, meanwhile, scores a zero rating for ease of use, with no recent reviews or user feedback to gauge its interface or onboarding experience. Its lack of reputation and user data suggest it may be less reliable or harder to implement effectively. Edge: RMS.
RMS offers 74 features, including integrated CRS, online support, booking engine, revenue management, group functionality, guest CRM, direct billing, automated night audit, multi-lingual/multi-currency support, channel manager, POS, guest portal, and more. These features are critical for property scalability and operational efficiency.
Ciaobooking, by contrast, claims no features or integrations in its profile, indicating a very limited scope. Without documented capabilities or added functionalities, it’s unlikely to support complex hotel operations or expansion. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s support scores 4.48/5, with recent reviews praising its quick, knowledgeable assistance and proactive customer service. One user highlights, “Support staff is very helpful and always responds promptly,” reflecting confidence in ongoing support.
Ciaobooking has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality. Its absence suggests limited user feedback or a less established support network. RMS’s well-rated support makes it the safer choice for hotels prioritizing responsive assistance. Edge: RMS.
RMS integrates with 112 verified partners, including Criton, Sage, STR, and Unifocus, offering extensive connectivity with distribution channels, revenue management, and POS systems. Its broad integration footprint supports multi-channel sales and operational syncing.
Ciaobooking’s profile shows zero verified integrations, restricting your hotel’s ability to connect with essential third-party systems and limiting scalability. For hotels seeking a connected tech stack, RMS’s integrations are a clear advantage. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s overall rating of 4.56/5, based on 293 reviews, indicates widespread satisfaction, especially among hotels like RV parks, resorts, and boutique hotels. Recent reviews highlight its reliability, detailed reporting, and support, with an 86% likelihood to recommend.
Ciaobooking’s zero ratings and reviews mean no measurable hotel satisfaction data exist, making RMS the clearly preferred choice among hoteliers who value proven performance and peer validation. Edge: RMS.
Ciaobooking’s pricing information is unavailable, suggesting it may be a custom or less transparent offering, which can be risky for hotel budgets. RMS’s base price is $800 per month, with no free tier or trial, but it’s a straightforward subscription model aligned with its extensive feature set.
While RMS’s cost may seem high, its proven capabilities and user satisfaction justify the investment, especially for properties needing comprehensive management solutions.
RMS offers a robust, feature-rich platform trusted by thousands worldwide, making it suitable for hotels that want to grow, automate, and connect their operations. Its extensive integrations, support, and recent positive reviews make it a safer, more reliable choice for most hotels.
Ciaobooking, lacking recent reviews and documented features, is better suited for small, budget-conscious properties or those experimenting with PMS systems without complex requirements. Its limited scope and unknown support quality pose risks for hotels expecting reliable, scalable management.
If you need a dependable, mature PMS that supports your hotel’s growth and operational complexity, RMS is the clear winner. For smaller, simpler operations, Ciaobooking might suffice temporarily but with significant limitations.
Note: The detailed review data indicates RMS is the more recommended platform, given its proven track record, extensive features, and high hotel satisfaction ratings.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Ciaobooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Ciaobooking and RMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 62 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Ciaobooking and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Ciaobooking offers 0 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Ciaobooking: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Ciaobooking has an HT Score of 0 and RMS has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor