The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 137 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CiHMS shines when it comes to operational efficiency — especially for Resorts properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Housekeeping Mobile App and Real Time Reporting.
HotelRunner shines , with exclusive features like Payment processing and On premise.
Side-by-side ratings based on 137 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 120 | 17 |
After analyzing 137 verified reviews, CiHMS users most value its operational efficiency, advanced reporting, task and resource management, while HotelRunner users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Task and Resource Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud-Based Accessibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
User Training and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Functionality
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #45 8 reviews | #38 5 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #20 31 reviews | #44 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 43 reviews | #34 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #4 31 reviews | #41 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #15 65 reviews | #36 8 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #10 83 reviews | #38 3 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #15 40 reviews | #47 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #17 15 reviews | #49 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #65 0 reviews | #36 2 reviews |
| Europe | #58 2 reviews | #35 3 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #6 117 reviews | #25 0 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #24 1 reviews | #4 6 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. Both CiHMS by CiHMS and HotelRunner PMS aim to streamline management tasks, but their core strengths differ. CiHMS tends to be favored for its extensive feature set and regional focus, while HotelRunner offers a more affordable, user-friendly platform with broader international reach. Which product aligns best with your specific needs?
Both products aim to simplify your daily operations, but they diverge in scope, features, and user feedback. CiHMS provides an all-encompassing management solution with advanced features like rate management and a dedicated mobile housekeeping app. HotelRunner, by contrast, emphasizes ease of use and integrations, including channel management and payment processing.
While CiHMS's interface and onboarding have high ratings, it has fewer recent reviews—zero in the last six months—making current user feedback less reliable. HotelRunner’s recent reviews, all from the last six months, rate it very highly, with a 5/5 overall, and 99% likelihood to recommend. This recent feedback indicates a more actively supported product with satisfied users.
In terms of product maturity, CiHMS has 101 reviews, whereas HotelRunner has only 16. The more recent reviews for HotelRunner reinforce its strong reputation, while CiHMS’s older reviews suggest stability but less current validation. If you prioritize recent user experiences, HotelRunner clearly leads.
If your hotel needs a flexible, easy-to-adopt system that covers fundamental PMS functions, HotelRunner is the better fit. Its competitive pricing ($100/month) and high user satisfaction, especially among boutique and B&B hotels, make it attractive. Its user-friendly interface scored a 4.81/5, and recent reviews praise its operational simplicity and ongoing support.
Conversely, if your hotel operates at a larger scale or requires advanced features like rate management, real-time reporting, and a dedicated housekeeping mobile app, CiHMS is preferable. Its more extensive feature set (22 shared features plus 11 exclusive ones) supports complex management needs, especially for resorts and chain hotels. The core advantage of CiHMS lies in its robust functionality, suited for more sophisticated operations.
In summary, for small-to-medium hotels that prioritize ease and affordability, HotelRunner is ideal. For larger or more complex properties seeking detailed control and customization, CiHMS offers a more comprehensive solution.
Both products excel in usability, but HotelRunner's recent review scores reflect a slightly higher ease-of-use rating at 4.81/5 compared to CiHMS’s 4.9/5. HotelRunner’s interface is praised as very user-friendly, with ongoing training and support helping staff adopt the system quickly. Its platform is optimized for quick reservations, guest management, and reporting, making daily tasks less burdensome.
CiHMS also boasts a very high usability score, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and stability. However, its onboarding process, rated at 4.84/5, can be somewhat complex due to its extensive features, and some users note the need for more mobile responsiveness.
Edge: HotelRunner.
CiHMS’s feature count surpasses HotelRunner with 22 shared features, plus 11 exclusive functionalities like a Spa & Wellness module, EPoS, task management, automated space optimization, and real-time reporting. These advanced tools support larger hotels needing detailed operational control and automation.
HotelRunner offers 7 unique features, including payment processing, guest CRM, native email marketing, and voice-to-text notes, which are valuable for smaller properties focused on direct communication and efficiency. Its integrations, with 17 verified partners, cover major OTAs like Expedia, Airbnb, and Agoda, facilitating wider distribution.
While CiHMS’s advanced modules are more suited for complex, multi-department management, HotelRunner’s core features are sufficient for straightforward operations.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s support ratings are slightly below HotelRunner’s, at 4.92/5 versus 5/5, but both are highly rated. Users praise CiHMS support for professionalism and timeliness, especially during onboarding, with comments like “Support team is professional and on-time.” However, some users find CiHMS’s support could be more responsive during peak times.
HotelRunner’s excellent reviews highlight ongoing training and support, with many users emphasizing their positive relationships and prompt assistance. The recent reviews for HotelRunner are more consistent, suggesting better ongoing support.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner offers 17 verified integrations, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and hotel tech solutions. Shared integrations include Easyway, but HotelRunner also connects with platform giants like Expedia, Airbnb, and Oracle Hospitality, providing broader distribution and operational options.
CiHMS’s integration count is smaller—only three verified partners, including SiteMinder and DerbySoft—limiting its ecosystem but emphasizing deep functionality within its core partners. If a broad, flexible integration network is essential, HotelRunner has a clear advantage.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s recent reviews are exclusively 5/5, with 16 hotels, mostly boutique and B&B properties, praising its ease of use, support, and operational improvements. Its high ratings and recent reviews suggest strong and current user satisfaction.
CiHMS, despite a higher overall score (81.25 on HTR Score), has a 0/5 overall rating from 101 reviews, with no recent feedback, indicating less current validation. Hoteliers in larger resorts and chains appreciate its advanced features, but recent user sentiment favors HotelRunner’s simplicity and support.
Edge: HotelRunner.
CiHMS is priced at a $900 flat monthly fee, with no free trial or freemium option, reflecting its enterprise-level positioning. This high upfront cost may suit larger hotels or chains seeking comprehensive management tools.
HotelRunner’s entry point is significantly lower at $100 per month, with no trial or implementation fees, making it accessible for small to medium-sized properties. Its affordable pricing combined with high satisfaction makes it a compelling choice for budget-conscious hoteliers.
CiHMS is a robust, feature-rich PMS designed for larger hotels and chains that need deep automation and control. Its extensive capabilities in rate management, real-time reporting, and modules like EPoS make it suitable for complex operations and regions like Asia Pacific and the Middle East.
HotelRunner offers a simple, affordable solution with excellent recent reviews, ideal for boutique and smaller hotels seeking straightforward management and strong distribution capabilities. Its high user satisfaction and broad integrations serve hotels eager to grow their online presence.
If your hotel values advanced features and regional focus, CiHMS is the better option. For hotels prioritizing ease of use, budget, and current positive feedback, HotelRunner is the recommended choice.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, CiHMS and HotelRunner PMS share 22 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines... The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines operations and enhances productivity across departments.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive... While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive training resources and detailed guides.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CiHMS and HotelRunner PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CiHMS offers 3 verified integration partners, while HotelRunner PMS offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. CiHMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CiHMS: No. HotelRunner PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CiHMS has an HT Score of 81 and HotelRunner has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor