The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 120 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CiHMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Resorts properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Housekeeping module.
Softstar shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 120 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 120 | 0 |
After analyzing 120 verified reviews, CiHMS users most value its operational efficiency, advanced reporting, task and resource management, while Softstar users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Softstar |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Task and Resource Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud-Based Accessibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
User Training and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Functionality
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #45 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #20 31 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 43 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #4 31 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #15 65 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #10 83 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #15 40 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #17 15 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| North America | #65 0 reviews | — |
| Europe | #58 2 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #6 117 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #24 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between CiHMS by CiHMS and Softstar boils down to understanding which platform best addresses your hotel’s specific operational needs. Both aim to streamline property management, but CiHMS dominates in reviews, recent user feedback, and regional presence. Its extensive feature set and higher support responsiveness make it the more reliable option for hoteliers aiming for efficiency and growth. Are you ready to see which solution aligns best with your hotel’s strategy?
CiHMS by CiHMS has received over 100 recent reviews, maintaining a high rating of 4.92/5 for support and 4.9/5 for ease of use. In contrast, Softstar has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction. Based on the available data, CiHMS clearly offers a more proven, well-supported system, especially for hotels seeking a comprehensive management solution.
Both CiHMS and Softstar are designed to help hotels manage reservations, operations, and guest services more efficiently. However, CiHMS’s robust feature set and extensive integrations directly target medium to large hotels that require detailed reporting, automation, and multi-channel management. Softstar, without recent reviews or detailed feature data, appears less proven, which raises questions about its reliability and market presence. Do you prioritize a system with a proven track record?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich PMS with strong support, go with CiHMS. It’s ideal for properties seeking advanced room allocation, revenue management, and multi-channel integration, especially in regions like Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Africa. Conversely, if your hotel is a small operation or just starting out and values AI-driven insights, Softstar's promise of automation and property optimization could be appealing—though the lack of recent reviews makes this uncertain. Does your hotel require proven stability or emerging AI capabilities?
CiHMS boasts a 4.9/5 ease of use rating based on 101 recent reviews, with users describing its interface as intuitive and stable. Support and onboarding ratings are similarly high at 4.92/5 and 4.84/5, respectively, with many praising the system’s simplicity once learned. Softstar offers no recent review data, making it impossible to assess its usability or support quality. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers 33 unique features, including a channel manager, revenue management, integrated CRS, booking engine, automated night audit, and more. It covers essential hotel operations from online booking to guest profiles and multi-currency support. Softstar’s feature list is unavailable, and no unique features are documented. Based on current information, CiHMS’s extensive capabilities make it the clear leader. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s support ratings are outstanding at 4.92/5, with reviews highlighting professional, timely assistance and a smooth onboarding process. Customers frequently mention that support is responsive and dedicated, reinforcing confidence in system stability. Softstar has no recent support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess service quality. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS integrates with three verified partners, including SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway, allowing seamless connection with external booking channels and distribution systems. Softstar lacks documented integrations, suggesting limited or unverified connections. If integrations are critical for your operations, CiHMS’s established partner network provides a distinct advantage. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s recent reviews result in an impressive 9.8/10 NPS score, with 98% of users recommending it. Hoteliers across segments—resorts, city hotels, and branded properties—highlight its operational efficiency and support. Softstar has no recent feedback or ratings, so user sentiment remains unverified. Clearly, CiHMS’s recent review volume and high recommendation rate position it as the preferred choice. Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s pricing starts at $900 per month without trial options or tiered pricing details. Softstar’s pricing information is unavailable, making direct comparison impossible. Given CiHMS’s transparent pricing and proven value, it offers a clearer investment pathway.
CiHMS is a mature, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record, especially in the Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Africa regions. Its high review volume and recent customer feedback underscore its reliability and support quality, making it suitable for medium to large hotels seeking comprehensive management.
Softstar, lacking recent reviews and detailed feature data, remains an unverified option. Its AI-driven promises may appeal to hotels exploring future-oriented tech but come with uncertain support and market presence.
In summary, if stability, extensive features, and proven support are your priorities, CiHMS is the clear choice. For hotels willing to navigate untested waters and prioritize AI insights, Softstar might be worth a closer look—though caution is advised due to the lack of recent data.
According to HTR's product database, CiHMS and Softstar share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module |
Showing top differences. 21 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines... The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines operations and enhances productivity across departments.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive... While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive training resources and detailed guides.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CiHMS and Softstar share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CiHMS offers 3 verified integration partners, while Softstar offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. CiHMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CiHMS: No. Softstar: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CiHMS has an HT Score of 81 and Softstar has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor