The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Citadel shines .
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 57 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Citadel users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Citadel |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system is crucial for streamlining your hotel's operations, enhancing guest experiences, and improving revenue management. Both Citadel by Citadel and Counter by Counter aim to address these needs, but they differ significantly in scope, user feedback, and market presence. Citadel’s lack of recent reviews and very low ratings raise questions about its viability, while Counter’s active, recent reviews, and high satisfaction scores suggest it’s a more reliable choice.
Are you looking for a fully integrated PMS with extensive features and proven support, or a lightweight, hostel-focused system that’s still evolving? Let's compare these two options to see which better fits your hotel.
Citadel, with its zero reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, appears to be an unproven and inactive product. It boasts a broad cybersecurity profile rather than hotel-specific functionalities, making it unsuitable for your property management needs. Counter, however, has accumulated 54 recent reviews in the past six months and holds a 4.73/5 rating, reflecting active development, user satisfaction, and ongoing support.
Given the lack of current data on Citadel, your team cannot rely on its performance or customer feedback. Counter’s recent reviews and high NPS score of 9.02/10 demonstrate consistent user trust and positive experiences.
Edge: Counter
If your hotel needs a dedicated property management platform with features like channel management, booking engine, and integrated payments, Counter is the clear choice. Its user base is predominantly hostels, but it also serves boutique and city hotels, making it versatile for small to medium-sized properties.
Conversely, Citadel’s focus on cybersecurity and absence of hotel-specific functionalities suggest it’s not intended as a PMS. If you were considering Citadel for property management, it’s better to look elsewhere — Counter offers purpose-built tools that streamline reservations, guest management, and operations.
Edge: Counter
Citadel offers no recent user reviews or ratings, so assessing its ease of use is impossible. Counter, with a 4.6/5 ease of use rating from 54 reviews, is widely praised for its intuitive interface, rapid onboarding, and user-friendly mobile app. Users highlight how quickly staff can learn the system and how it reduces manual tasks.
Counter’s interface is described as clean, simple, and accessible across devices, helping your team adopt it swiftly. Citadel’s usability remains uncertain, but based on available data, Counter clearly leads in user-friendliness.
Edge: Counter
Citadel provides no documented features tailored for hotel operations, indicating it lacks core PMS functionalities. Counter, on the other hand, offers 19 specific features, including channel management, booking engine, online support, POS integration, guest CRM, multi-currency, and group bookings.
Counter’s feature set is comprehensive for hostel and small hotel management, allowing central control of reservations, revenue, and guest data. Citadel’s features are not publicly outlined or proven to meet hotel operational needs.
Edge: Counter
Citadel’s support ratings are unavailable, making it impossible to evaluate their responsiveness or helpfulness. Counter, with a 4.96/5 customer support rating from 54 recent reviews, is highly praised for its quick, professional, and attentive service. Users share quotes like, “Support is always there to help,” and “Evelyn and Max are very responsive and professional.”
This consistency in high support ratings indicates your team will receive timely assistance with Counter. The lack of recent Citadel reviews leaves its support quality in question.
Edge: Counter
Citadel offers no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other platforms or tools. Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, Goki, and GDS systems, covering payments, channel management, and access control.
Counter’s integrations allow your property to streamline finances, distribution, and guest services, while Citadel’s absence of integrations suggests it’s not designed for operational connectivity.
Edge: Counter
Citadel’s ratings are nonexistent, so it cannot be rated by hoteliers. Counter, however, has a 4.73/5 rating based on 54 recent reviews, with users across hostel, boutique, and city hotel segments giving positive feedback.
Hoteliers highlight Counter’s ease of use, support, and feature set, with reviews like “This system simplifies our daily tasks” and “Responsive support makes a difference.”
Edge: Counter
Citadel’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears to be inactive or not publicly marketed as a PMS. Counter is also free, making it attractive for small hostels and budget-conscious properties, though some users mention that advanced features could benefit from clearer pricing options.
Since both lack transparent pricing, your team should inquire directly for customized quotes, but Counter’s free tier makes it easier to trial without upfront investment.
Edge: Counter (due to transparency and no-cost entry)
Citadel is not suitable for any hotel type, given its lack of hotel-specific features, recent reviews, or proven support. Its cybersecurity focus indicates it’s aimed at businesses needing digital asset protection, not property management.
Teams considering Citadel should be aware it’s not a PMS, making it a poor choice for any hotel looking for operational software.
Not ideal if…
Counter is designed for hostels, with 83% of users in that segment, but it also suits boutique and city hotels. It’s ideal if your property:
Not ideal if…
Counter stands out as a proven, actively supported PMS with a broad feature set tailored for small to medium properties, especially hostels. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive integrations make it a reliable choice for hoteliers seeking efficiency and support.
Citadel, on the other hand, offers no recent or verified hotel management features, with its focus seemingly on cybersecurity. Unless your hotel requires cybersecurity solutions for digital assets, Citadel isn’t a viable option.
If you need a modern, user-friendly, and well-supported PMS with ongoing development, go with Counter. For unfamiliar or specialized cybersecurity needs, consider Citadel—but not as your primary property management tool.
Final note: For practical hotel management, Counter’s recent active reviews and high user ratings make it the safer, more effective choice.
According to HTR's product database, Citadel and Counter share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Citadel and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Citadel offers 0 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Citadel: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Citadel has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor