The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 79 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Getabed Suite shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 79 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 79 | 0 |
After analyzing 79 verified reviews, Clock users most value its ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, customer service and support, while Getabed Suite users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Connectivity
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile and User Interface
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #21 19 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #14 28 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #17 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #18 30 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #18 14 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #15 15 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #16 8 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 11 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #9 38 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #12 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #18 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Clock HMS by Clock and Getabed Suite can significantly impact your hotel’s operations and revenue. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but Clock offers a broad, feature-rich platform with proven recent user engagement, while Getabed Suite emphasizes increasing direct bookings through a high-conversion booking engine. Your decision should hinge on your hotel’s specific needs—whether operational depth or reservation growth is your priority.
Clock’s extensive feature set and recent growth in user reviews make it a more reliable choice for hotels wanting a comprehensive management system. Conversely, Getabed Suite’s lack of recent reviews and limited market presence suggest it’s less tested in the field.
Both products aim to help your team manage reservations, guest data, and daily hotel operations. Clock provides a full-spectrum property management system (PMS) that includes booking engines, channel management, housekeeping, POS, and analytics, making it suitable for hotels seeking an all-in-one platform. Getabed Suite, on the other hand, centers primarily on increasing direct reservations via its booking engine, with fewer operational modules and no recent user reviews to confirm its broader effectiveness.
Where Clock’s strengths lie in its mature, feature-rich environment, Getabed Suite’s focus remains narrowly on reservation conversion. If your hotel needs a comprehensive PMS, Clock is the more proven choice. If your priority is boosting direct bookings without commission fees, Getabed Suite could be appealing—but its lack of recent reviews limits confidence.
Are you looking for a holistic management platform or just a high-conversion booking engine? This fundamental question guides whether Clock or Getabed Suite better suits your hotel.
If your hotel requires a full suite of management tools—reservations, rates, invoicing, housekeeping, POS, guest messaging, and analytics—Clock is the clear choice. With over 63 recent reviews and a 4.88/5 overall rating, it’s trusted by hotels across multiple segments, especially boutique, city-center, and independent hotels.
If your primary goal is to increase direct bookings via your website, and you’re comfortable with a less comprehensive system, Getabed Suite’s high-conversion booking engine might seem appealing. But with zero reviews and a much smaller presence, it’s difficult to verify its effectiveness or reliability.
For hotels seeking operational depth that’s been battle-tested recently, Clock is the safer, more established option. For those solely focused on reservation growth and willing to accept less proven tools, Getabed Suite might initially seem attractive—yet its absence of recent data makes that riskier.
Clock’s user interface scores a 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting its straightforward navigation and strong support team. Users praise its ease of onboarding and how quickly staff can adapt, even during busy periods, often noting that the system’s ongoing updates improve usability.
Getabed Suite offers no recent reviews or detailed user feedback, making it impossible to assess its ease of use. Its lack of visible user ratings and limited market presence suggest it may not have been tested thoroughly in real-world hotel environments.
Based on available data, Clock offers a proven, user-friendly experience that facilitates staff adoption. Edge: Clock.
Clock boasts an extensive library of 49 unique features, including booking engine, channel management, POS, guest feedback, digital registration, real-time reporting, and more. Its modules support multi-currency, multi-lingual operations, and advanced automation, covering nearly every aspect of hotel management.
Getabed Suite has no documented features beyond its core reservation engine and basic guest management, with no reported additional modules. The platform seems focused on increasing direct reservations, but lacks the broader operational tools Clock offers.
If comprehensive functionality is your goal, Clock’s 49 features provide a significant advantage. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s support ratings are high—4.78/5—with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, support team expertise, and helpful onboarding. Users frequently mention that support staff listen carefully and resolve issues quickly, which is vital for implementing complex systems.
Getabed Suite has no recent reviews or detailed feedback on support, making it impossible to compare. Its limited market exposure suggests support quality is uncertain.
For reliable, well-rated support, Clock stands out. Edge: Clock.
Clock offers integration with 111 verified partners, including OTAs, payment processors, revenue management tools, and other hotel tech solutions. Its open API and extensive partner network facilitate seamless operation and data flow across systems.
Getabed Suite has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with existing hotel systems. This could restrict your operational flexibility and data accuracy.
If integration breadth matters, Clock’s extensive partner network is a clear advantage. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s recent reviews—numbering 63—are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.88/5 rating and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers from boutique, independent, and city-center hotels praise its ease of use, features, and support.
Getabed Suite has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Its market presence is small, and lack of feedback diminishes confidence.
For proven hotelier satisfaction and high ratings, Clock is the clear leader. Edge: Clock.
Clock charges a flat $600/month fee, with no freemium, implementation costs, or additional charges for integrations. Its transparent pricing aligns well with mid-sized hotels needing a comprehensive system.
Getabed Suite’s pricing is not publicly listed, suggesting potential custom quotes and less transparency. This lack of clarity could lead to unexpected costs.
If clear, predictable pricing is critical, Clock offers that advantage. Edge: Clock.
Not ideal if you only need a simple booking engine or are operating at a very small scale without complex management needs.
Not ideal if you require comprehensive operational management or seek proven support and integrations.
Clock HMS by Clock offers a comprehensive, highly-rated system with recent positive reviews and a strong track record. Its extensive feature set, integrations, and support make it suitable for hotels seeking an all-in-one management platform capable of handling complex operations.
Getabed Suite, while focused on increasing direct reservations through its booking engine, lacks recent validation and a broad feature set. Its minimal market presence and absence of recent reviews make it a less reliable choice for hotels looking for proven operational tools.
For hotels prioritizing operational depth and recent user confidence, Clock is the clear winner. If your primary goal is reservation growth and you are willing to accept limited features and support, Getabed Suite might be worth exploring—but proceed cautiously given the limited recent data.
Hotel Management Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Clock HMS and Getabed Suite share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Point of Sale | ||
| Pricing Intelligence | ||
| Property Management System |
Showing top differences. 37 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ offers reliable customer support, noted for fast and responsive assistance. Although generally praised, there is feedback regarding occasio... Clock PMS+ offers reliable customer support, noted for fast and responsive assistance. Although generally praised, there is feedback regarding occasional incorrect guidance and the need for expert advice. Users suggest improvements in experiential guidance and support for complex functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Though Clock PMS+ covers core analytics needs, many users indicate a desire for improved, customizable reporting. This includes integrating with Excel... Though Clock PMS+ covers core analytics needs, many users indicate a desire for improved, customizable reporting. This includes integrating with Excel and providing more detailed financial analyses and operational metrics. Some users find the existing reports inadequate and cumbersome to compile comprehensive insights from.
Users have expressed interest in more customization options and flexible settings to meet specific hotel needs. While generally satisfied, some users... Users have expressed interest in more customization options and flexible settings to meet specific hotel needs. While generally satisfied, some users note the desire to modify reports and interface settings to better support dynamic operations and marketing strategies.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Clock HMS and Getabed Suite share many core Hotel Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock HMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while Getabed Suite offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock HMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock HMS: No. Getabed Suite: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 79 and Getabed Suite has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor