The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 81 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines in customer support and onboarding — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Innsoft (Yanolja) shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 81 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 79 | 2 |
After analyzing 81 verified reviews, Clock users most value its ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, customer service and support, while Innsoft (Yanolja) users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Connectivity
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile and User Interface
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #21 19 reviews | #45 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #14 28 reviews | #42 1 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #17 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #18 30 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #18 14 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #15 15 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #16 8 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 11 reviews | #37 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #9 38 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #12 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #18 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Clock HMS by Clock and Innsoft HMS by Innsoft (Yanolja) demands an understanding of their core strengths. Both systems serve hotel management needs but differ significantly in features, user experience, and regional presence. Clock, with its broad feature set and recent positive reviews, appeals to hotels seeking an all-in-one solution that handles reservations, rates, and guest engagement. Innsoft, more limited in recent feedback and regional reach, offers basic property management capabilities with less integration and fewer modern features. Which platform suits your hotel’s needs best?
Clock HMS offers a comprehensive hotel management suite with over 49 unique features, including booking engine, channel management, POS, guest messaging, and online check-in. Innsoft’s platform is primarily a reservation and billing tool with only a few core functionalities, lacking the extensive features of Clock. Both aim to streamline daily operations, but Clock’s modular tools support complex workflows, while Innsoft’s simplicity caters to straightforward needs.
Recent reviews favor Clock, with 63 total reviews and a high rating of 4.88/5, including 5 recent reviews from the last six months. Innsoft has only 2 reviews, with no recent feedback, making its data less reliable. The newer reviews of Clock highlight its ease of use, robust support, and feature-rich environment, whereas Innsoft’s reviews mainly praise its straightforwardness but note its limited scope and outdated support experience. Do you prioritize comprehensive functionality or simplicity?
If your hotel needs an all-encompassing platform with extensive operational tools, Clock is the clear choice. It suits mid-sized to larger hotels and boutique properties that require integrated booking, point of sale, housekeeping, and revenue management tools. Innsoft, with its minimal feature set and regional focus, might appeal to small, independent hotels or motels seeking basic reservation and billing functions at a lower cost, but without the advanced features.
Hotels that want to optimize revenue through dynamic pricing, automate guest communications, and manage multiple channels should go with Clock. Those that prioritize simplicity, basic reservation management, and a straightforward interface may find Innsoft sufficient. However, consider the limited recent reviews and lack of recent updates for Innsoft before making a decision.
Clock HMS has a well-rated usability score of 4.73/5 based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive navigation and support. Its onboarding process, rated 4.71/5, focuses on helping users get familiar quickly, though some mention initial setup complexity. Innsoft scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use but suffers from a low onboarding rating of 2.75/5, indicating a steep learning curve and less support during implementation.
Reviewers of Clock highlight its straightforward interface and helpful support team, making daily use efficient. Innsoft’s simplicity makes it easy to learn initially, but the lack of support and features can lead to frustrations as needs grow. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s feature count is extensive, offering 49 unique functionalities including a booking engine, multi-currency support, channel manager, property management system, POS, guest feedback management, digital registration, online check-in/out, and integrated payment terminals. Innsoft, by comparison, lacks the same breadth, with no unique features listed beyond basic reservation and billing tools.
Clock’s advanced tools facilitate revenue optimization, guest engagement, and operational automation, making it suitable for hotels seeking to grow and innovate. Innsoft provides essential reservation management but does not include the extensive automation or integration capabilities of Clock. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s support ratings are high, with a score of 4.78/5 and recent reviewers praising its responsiveness and support team’s expertise. Comments include "excellent support" and "support staff listen and improve," indicating a positive support experience. Innsoft scores 3/5 for customer support, with reviews noting slow responses and limited assistance, which can be problematic during busy periods.
Clock’s support team appears more capable of resolving issues quickly and providing ongoing assistance, essential for hotels relying on technology for daily operations. Innsoft’s support, although functional, seems less responsive and less equipped for complex issues. Edge: Clock.
Clock boasts 111 verified partners, including Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, RevControl, and others, offering extensive integration options. Innsoft has only 3 verified partners, including Amadeus and SHR Group, with limited integration scope. Shared integrations are none, emphasizing Clock’s superior connectivity.
For hotels that depend on multiple third-party tools—like revenue management, booking engines, or payment processors—Clock’s broad partner network ensures smoother automation and data flow. Innsoft’s limited integrations restrict its adaptability to modern hotel ecosystems. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s recent reviews demonstrate a high property rating average of 4.83/5, with many independent and boutique hoteliers emphasizing its ease of use, support, and feature set. Innsoft’s user ratings are not recent or detailed, but the available reviews indicate a 2/5 rating from at least one user, with criticisms about functionality and support.
Clock’s reviews show strong satisfaction across various property types, especially boutique and branded hotels. Innsoft’s limited feedback and older reviews suggest it may not meet the needs of hotels aiming for modern, scalable management. Edge: Clock.
Clock charges a $600 one-time base fee, with no ongoing implementation, monthly, or per-room charges, making its pricing transparent and predictable. Innsoft does not publicly list its pricing, which could mean variable or custom quotes, potentially making budgeting more difficult.
Given Clock’s clear upfront pricing and comprehensive features, hoteliers can better assess ROI and plan expenses. Innsoft’s pricing model remains unclear, which might be a concern for budget-conscious hotels. Edge: Clock.
Clock is a comprehensive hotel management system designed to support growth, automation, and multi-channel distribution. Its extensive feature set, high recent review scores, and broad integration network make it the stronger choice for hotels looking to streamline operations and increase revenue. Innsoft offers a basic reservation solution suited for small properties with minimal automation, but its limited recent feedback and regional presence put it at a disadvantage.
Choose Clock if you want a future-proof, scalable platform with strong support and integrations. Opt for Innsoft if your needs are simple, and cost or ease of use are your primary concerns—just be aware of its limited features and support. For most hotels seeking modern, reliable management, Clock stands out as the clearer choice.
Hotel Management Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Clock HMS and Innsoft HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Point of Sale | ||
| Pricing Intelligence | ||
| Property Management System |
Showing top differences. 37 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ offers reliable customer support, noted for fast and responsive assistance. Although generally praised, there is feedback regarding occasio... Clock PMS+ offers reliable customer support, noted for fast and responsive assistance. Although generally praised, there is feedback regarding occasional incorrect guidance and the need for expert advice. Users suggest improvements in experiential guidance and support for complex functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Though Clock PMS+ covers core analytics needs, many users indicate a desire for improved, customizable reporting. This includes integrating with Excel... Though Clock PMS+ covers core analytics needs, many users indicate a desire for improved, customizable reporting. This includes integrating with Excel and providing more detailed financial analyses and operational metrics. Some users find the existing reports inadequate and cumbersome to compile comprehensive insights from.
Users have expressed interest in more customization options and flexible settings to meet specific hotel needs. While generally satisfied, some users... Users have expressed interest in more customization options and flexible settings to meet specific hotel needs. While generally satisfied, some users note the desire to modify reports and interface settings to better support dynamic operations and marketing strategies.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Clock HMS and Innsoft HMS share many core Hotel Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock HMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while Innsoft HMS offers 3. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Innsoft HMS leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock HMS: No. Innsoft HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 79 and Innsoft (Yanolja) has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor