The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 328 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Comanche International shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 328 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 328 | 0 |
After analyzing 328 verified reviews, Clock users most value its feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates, while Comanche International users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 117 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 157 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 165 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 80 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 62 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 27 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 30 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 228 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #11 13 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #17 2 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for streamlining operations, enhancing guest experiences, and improving profitability. Both Clock PMS and Comanche PMS aim to serve this purpose, but their approaches differ significantly. Clock PMS offers a comprehensive, all-in-one cloud-based platform with a robust feature set and extensive user reviews. Comanche PMS, on the other hand, is a broader IT solution tailored for hospitality businesses but lacks recent review data.
Given the data, your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a well-reviewed, feature-rich PMS or a more general IT solution with limited recent feedback. Which system better aligns with your hotel’s operational needs?
Clock PMS and Comanche PMS both aim to simplify hotel operations, but their scope and user feedback diverge. Clock PMS is a dedicated hotel-centric PMS with over 250 reviews, a 4.8/5 overall rating, and recent positive feedback from hoteliers emphasizing ease of use and comprehensive features. Conversely, Comanche PMS, with no recent reviews or ratings, is a broad IT provider supporting various hospitality segments, but lacks specific user insights into its PMS capabilities.
Clock’s recent reviews highlight its simplicity, automation, and extensive integrations, making it a trusted choice for busy hotels. Comanche’s broader focus on IT solutions suggests versatility but leaves hoteliers questioning its suitability as a dedicated PMS. Are you better served by a platform with proven hotel-specific functionality and recent user feedback?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, easy-to-implement PMS with a strong user base and recent positive reviews, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its extensive features—booking engine, channel manager, guest messaging, revenue management, and more—are specifically designed for hoteliers seeking operational efficiency.
If your hotel primarily requires an IT solution with some hotel management capabilities, or if you operate in a region where Comanche’s support and integrations are advantageous, then Comanche might be suitable. However, given the lack of recent hotel-specific reviews, Clock’s proven track record makes it the safer, more reliable option.
Clock PMS is rated 4.78/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Hoteliers report that new staff can learn the system rapidly, and the platform’s simplicity enhances daily operations, especially during busy periods.
In contrast, Comanche PMS’s user experience data is unavailable, and the platform’s broader IT orientation suggests it may require more technical expertise. Without recent user feedback, it’s difficult to gauge how easily hoteliers adapt to Comanche’s interface.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts 58 exclusive features, including a booking engine, channel management, integrated CRS, revenue management, guest profiles, automated billing, and more—features tailored specifically for hotel operations. It also supports ancillary revenue, mobile check-in, housekeeper mobile apps, and automated workflows, making it a comprehensive end-to-end solution.
Comanche PMS’s feature set is less clearly outlined, with no specific features highlighted in recent reviews. Its broader IT focus suggests it may lack some hotel-specific functionalities or depth found in Clock PMS.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s support ratings are impressive, with a 4.75/5 score and reviews emphasizing prompt, helpful assistance. Hoteliers commonly mention that the support team responds quickly, often aiding with onboarding and troubleshooting.
Comanche’s support ratings are not available; with no recent reviews, it’s uncertain how responsive or effective their support truly is in a hotel setting.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS integrates with 111 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, RateGain, and D-Edge, offering extensive options for connecting third-party systems. This wide partner network ensures flexibility to customize and grow your tech stack.
Comanche PMS has only 12 verified partners, with shared integrations including Cendyn and LodgIQ, but fewer options overall. For hotels prioritizing seamless integration with widely used solutions, Clock’s extensive network is a clear advantage.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s recent reviews reflect a high level of satisfaction, especially among boutique and independent hotels, with an average rating of 4.83/5 and 95% likelihood to recommend. Hotels praise its ease of use, automation, and support, which are critical for busy operations.
Comanche PMS’s user ratings are unavailable, making it difficult to assess hotel satisfaction. Based on available data, Clock has a proven, highly-rated reputation among hoteliers.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS is priced at a flat $600 per month, with no implementation or setup fees, providing transparent pricing. Comanche PMS’s pricing details are not publicly available, which is common among broader IT solutions.
For hotels seeking predictable costs, Clock offers a clear, upfront fee, while Comanche’s pricing likely varies based on scope and support needs.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very small scale with minimal tech needs or if you rely heavily on a local, region-specific PMS with less cloud infrastructure.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a dedicated, hotel-specific PMS with recent user reviews or if you prioritize a highly intuitive, easy-to-learn interface.
Clock PMS and Comanche PMS serve different needs within the hospitality industry. Clock PMS is a dedicated, well-reviewed hotel PMS offering extensive features, proven support, and recent positive feedback from users globally. Comanche PMS is a broader IT solution with a focus on multiple hospitality segments but lacks recent hotel-specific reviews, making its suitability less clear.
If your primary goal is to streamline hotel operations with a trusted, comprehensive PMS, Clock PMS is the stronger choice. Its high review count, recent feedback, and extensive integrations make it the safer, more reliable investment.
Choose Clock PMS if you want a trusted, feature-rich platform with a proven track record. Opt for Comanche if your operation benefits from a broad IT solution, especially if regional support and customization are priorities.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a proven, user-rated PMS today, Clock PMS stands out as the clear winner.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Clock PMS and Comanche PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 46 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Clock PMS and Comanche PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock PMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while Comanche PMS offers 12. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock PMS: No. Comanche PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 84 and Comanche International has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor