The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 395 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Comanche International shines .
ThinkReservations shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 395 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 395 |
After analyzing 395 verified reviews, Comanche International users most value its , while ThinkReservations users highlight customer support, operational efficiency, data and reporting. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Data and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with OTAs
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Pricing and Fees
▾
|
|
|
−
Security Features
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 145 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #9 25 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #6 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #5 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #7 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #7 70 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #7 24 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #11 8 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #1 386 reviews |
| Europe | — | #57 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #32 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #32 0 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations, guest satisfaction, and profitability. You’re evaluating Comanche PMS by Comanche International and ThinkReservations PMS by ThinkReservations, both designed to streamline hotel management. While Comanche offers a broad IT solution rooted in international markets, ThinkReservations provides a feature-rich platform with a strong North American presence. But which one truly supports your hotel’s specific needs?
Both products aim to simplify daily tasks, improve efficiency, and boost revenue, yet their approaches and strengths differ. Does your hotel prioritize extensive online integrations and modern usability, or do you need a comprehensive system tailored for small to mid-sized inns and B&Bs?
Comanche PMS is a longstanding IT solution based in Thailand, serving over 900 clients across 18 countries since 1996. It covers a wide range of hospitality operations, including hotels, restaurants, clubs, and resorts, emphasizing total operational control. ThinkReservations, on the other hand, is a cloud-based PMS focused primarily on North American small hotels, inns, and vacation rentals, boasting a modern interface and a large user base with over 356 recent reviews.
The key difference lies in their review volume and recency: ThinkReservations’ significantly higher review count (356 vs. none for Comanche) and recent ratings (4.88/5) make it the more tested and trusted option today. Comanche’s lack of recent reviews and absence of a visible user rating suggest limited current support or market presence. Are you comfortable adopting a less-reviewed platform, or do you prefer the stability of a product backed by recent user feedback?
If your hotel is a small property, inn, or bed & breakfast looking for an easy-to-use, highly supported platform with extensive online integrations, go with ThinkReservations. Its 4.88/5 rating from 356 reviews, recent customer praise, and features like channel management, online booking, and guest messaging make it ideal for properties aiming to increase revenue while reducing operational hassle.
If, however, your hotel operates in Asia, Europe, or the Middle East and requires a total IT solution capable of managing restaurant, club, and resort operations with a customizable system, Comanche might seem appealing. Yet, with no recent reviews or clear evidence of active support, it may not be the best choice unless your requirements are very specific to its legacy setup.
In summary: For most hotels seeking modern features and proven support, ThinkReservations is the definitive choice. Comanche’s lack of recent validation makes it less suitable for current needs.
ThinkReservations’ UI scores 4.82/5 and has a proven onboarding experience rated 4.73/5, with many users describing it as “easy to use” and “like adding another employee.” Customers highlight its intuitive booking engine, automated messaging, and straightforward setup as key strengths, supported by recent positive reviews.
Comanche PMS, with a 0/5 usability rating and no recent reviews, offers an unclear user experience. Its platform, rooted in traditional IT solutions, may require more training and potentially present a steeper learning curve for staff unfamiliar with legacy systems.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations offers a robust suite of 39 features, including a channel manager, booking engine, guest profiles, automated reminders, digital registration, and real-time reporting. It also provides integrations with major OTAs like Airbnb, Expedia, and TripAdvisor, along with payment processing, housekeeing modules, and multi-lingual support.
Comanche PMS lacks documented features, with no unique functionalities listed beyond its core IT solution. Its platform appears to focus more on basic reservation and operational functions without the extensive add-ons ThinkReservations provides.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations’ support ratings are one of its standout features, with a 4.82/5 score and many reviews praising its prompt, knowledgeable, and accessible team. Users often describe their experience as “like having another employee,” emphasizing its reliability and ongoing improvements.
In contrast, Comanche International has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving support quality and responsiveness unclear. Without current user feedback, it’s difficult to assess whether Comanche can match ThinkReservations’ level of customer service.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations connects with 16 verified partners, including top OTAs and channel managers like Expedia, Airbnb, and Triptease. Its integrations cover payment processing, guest messaging, and digital check-in, streamlining operations across multiple platforms.
Comanche International, with 12 verified partners, includes key players like SiteMinder, RateGain, and LodgIQ but misses some of the broader integrations that are standard today. Its fewer and less recent integrations suggest it’s less adaptable to modern hospitality tech stacks.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations boasts a 4.88/5 rating from 356 reviews, with many recent reviews highlighting its ease of use, support, and revenue-boosting features. Hotels of all sizes, especially inns and B&Bs, rate it highly, frequently mentioning its automation and intuitive interface.
Comanche International has no recent reviews or ratings and is not rated by users in the last six months. Its absence of current feedback indicates it’s not actively supporting or improving its platform, making it a less reliable choice.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Comanche International’s pricing details are unavailable, which might imply custom quotes or higher barriers to entry. ThinkReservations’ straightforward pricing is $500 monthly, with no mention of implementation fees or additional charges, providing clearer budgeting.
Since Comanche lacks transparent pricing info, your decision may depend on negotiating custom agreements, whereas ThinkReservations offers predictable costs with proven value for small to mid-sized hotels.
The core difference is that ThinkReservations is a highly reviewed, actively supported cloud platform with a broad array of features designed for small to mid-sized hotels. Comanche, meanwhile, is a legacy solution with no recent validation, likely better suited for properties already familiar with its niche market.
If your hotel needs a modern, reliable, and well-supported PMS, go with ThinkReservations. It offers proven support, a feature-rich environment, and recent positive reviews that back up its claims.
Choose Comanche if your hotel operates across multiple regions with complex needs, and you are comfortable with legacy systems and less current support. However, for most hotels today, ThinkReservations is the safer, smarter choice.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Comanche PMS and ThinkReservations PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 27 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
What hoteliers love
Though already noted as excellent by many, a few reviews express the desire for additional support on weekends to better handle urgent inquiries.
ThinkReservations aids in streamlining operations through digital registration, night audits, and easy management of booking and check-in processes, a... ThinkReservations aids in streamlining operations through digital registration, night audits, and easy management of booking and check-in processes, allowing staff to focus more on guest interactions.
The system offers comprehensive data and reporting features, enabling hoteliers to make informed decisions on pricing, guest satisfaction, and strateg... The system offers comprehensive data and reporting features, enabling hoteliers to make informed decisions on pricing, guest satisfaction, and strategy planning.
Where hoteliers push back
Some reviews highlight issues with the pricing structure, including dissatisfaction with channel manager fees and the high price of features like Thin... Some reviews highlight issues with the pricing structure, including dissatisfaction with channel manager fees and the high price of features like ThinkMessenger.
Mandatory two-step authentication is a point of frustration for some users, who find it burdensome and wish for lower security settings.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Comanche PMS and ThinkReservations PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Comanche PMS offers 12 verified integration partners, while ThinkReservations PMS offers 16. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ThinkReservations PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Comanche PMS: No. ThinkReservations PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Comanche International has an HT Score of 0 and ThinkReservations has 89. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor