The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 328 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Maxial shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 328 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 328 | 0 |
After analyzing 328 verified reviews, Clock users most value its feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates, while Maxial users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Maxial |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 117 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 157 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 165 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 80 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 62 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 27 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 30 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 228 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #11 13 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #17 2 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel involves weighing factors like features, usability, support, and overall value. Clock PMS leads in reviews and recent user feedback, providing a comprehensive and trusted solution, while Maxial remains unreviewed and unranked in current data. Your decision hinges on which platform's strengths align best with your hotel’s needs, so let's explore how they compare.
Both Clock PMS and Maxial aim to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly. Clock offers an extensive suite of features—reservation management, booking engine, housekeeping, CRM, online check-in, and more—delivered through a single cloud-based platform. Maxial, on the other hand, presents a unified management system with AI-driven review summaries but lacks detailed feature disclosures and active user reviews to verify its capabilities.
Clock’s current review count (251 reviews in the last six months) and high ratings (4.8/5 overall) establish it as a trusted choice. Maxial has no recent reviews or rating data, making it difficult to assess its performance or industry standing. Do you want a proven, highly-rated system or a less transparent alternative?
If your hotel needs a versatile, well-supported PMS with extensive integrations, choose Clock. It’s suitable for hotels of all sizes, especially those seeking automation, online check-in, and integrated revenue management, evidenced by its 111 verified partners and broad regional presence. Maxial might appeal if your hotel values AI insights from guest reviews, but without user feedback or proven adoption, its practical benefits remain uncertain.
For hotels prioritizing comprehensive operational control, Clock’s feature set and proven reliability make it the clear leader. If you’re more interested in AI-driven insights and are comfortable with an untested platform, Maxial could be considered, but the lack of reviews diminishes confidence.
Clock’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.78/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users highlight that new staff can learn the system quickly, helping operational ramp-up during busy periods.
Maxial’s usability remains unverified due to the absence of recent user feedback. Without confirmed ratings or reviews, it’s impossible to definitively compare the user experience.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock’s feature list exceeds 58 unique functionalities, including payment processing, booking engine, channel management, revenue modules, guest profiles, online check-in, mobile app, and extensive automation tools. These are well documented and backed by user reviews.
Maxial offers AI-driven review summaries and possibly other modules, but specifics are not publicly available or user-verified. The lack of detailed feature disclosure and no recent reviews mean Clock’s feature richness is more tangible and reliable.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock’s support team garners a 4.75/5 rating, with users emphasizing prompt responses, helpfulness, and ongoing updates. Recent reviews cite the support team’s efficiency as a key factor in their positive experience.
Maxial provides no publicly available review data or feedback, so support quality and responsiveness cannot be confidently evaluated.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock boasts 111 verified integrations, including popular partners like Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, and Profitroom. This extensive network enables seamless connectivity with third-party tools, enhancing operational flexibility.
Maxial has no publicly verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems. For hotels that rely on a broad ecosystem of partners, Clock’s integrations are a major advantage.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock’s recent reviews (251 in the last 6 months) show a 4.8/5 overall rating and a 95% likelihood to recommend, indicating strong satisfaction across diverse hotel segments. Independent hotels and boutique properties, in particular, rate Clock highly, often praising its ease of use and support.
Maxial has no recent reviews or ratings, so comparative hotel feedback is unavailable. Without recent data, Clock’s proven popularity and high ratings make it the more trusted choice.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no trial, freemium, or implementation fees disclosed. Its transparent pricing model aligns with its broad feature set.
Maxial’s pricing details are not publicly available, making direct comparison impossible. Given the lack of transparency and reviews, cost certainty favors Clock.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small and only needs basic reservations or manual management, or if you prefer a niche platform with AI review insights over operational features.
Not ideal if you need proven integrations, extensive feature sets, or require high support and reliability backed by recent user reviews.
Clock PMS’s core advantage is its extensive feature set, proven reliability, and high user satisfaction. It excels in delivering operational control, seamless integrations, and strong support, making it suitable for a wide range of hotel types.
When to choose Clock: If you seek a comprehensive, well-supported PMS with proven track record, broad integrations, and recent positive user feedback, it’s the clear choice. Its modern features like online check-in, payment automation, and mobile management support busy hotel environments.
When to choose Maxial: If your hotel specifically values AI review insights and prefers a platform with a focus on guest feedback analysis, Maxial might be appealing—but the absence of recent reviews and detailed info limits confidence. It’s a riskier choice without verifiable industry proof.
In summary, Clock PMS remains the recommended solution for hotels that need a trusted, feature-rich PMS with ongoing support and proven industry presence. Maxial’s appeal is theoretical at this stage, lacking the validation that comes from active user feedback and established integrations.
According to HTR's product database, Clock PMS and Maxial share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 46 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Clock PMS and Maxial share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock PMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while Maxial offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock PMS: No. Maxial: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 84 and Maxial has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor