The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 549 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
HOTELTIME shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Maxial shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 549 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 549 | 0 |
After analyzing 549 verified reviews, HOTELTIME users most value its user interface and learning curve, technical support, reporting and analytics, while Maxial users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Maxial |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Technical Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Optimization
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #5 219 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #3 238 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #2 46 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #8 7 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #3 241 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 143 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 49 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| North America | #52 4 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #5 111 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #1 21 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is pivotal for your hotel's operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. HOTELTIME PMS by HOTELTIME and Maxial both aim to streamline hotel management, but their reach, features, and support levels differ significantly. HOTELTIME’s extensive review base, recent feedback, and feature-rich platform position it as the more proven choice for hoteliers aiming for a reliable, scalable PMS.
While Maxial offers a comprehensive management approach, its current lack of reviews and regional presence makes HOTELTIME the clearer choice for most hotels. Are you ready to choose a PMS backed by proven customer satisfaction and extensive capabilities?
HOTELTIME stands out as a mature, globally recognized PMS with over 433 recent reviews, a 4.83/5 rating, and a 93% likelihood of recommendation. Its cloud-based platform covers a broad spectrum of hotel needs, integrating seamlessly with POS, CRS, and revenue management modules, supporting operations from independent boutique hotels to resorts across 32 countries.
Maxial, on the other hand, lacks recent reviews, detailed user feedback, and a visible market presence. Its platform claims a comprehensive approach but offers no verified integrations or regional deployment data. With no recent customer insights or reviews, Maxial's market credibility remains uncertain.
Given the clear gap in recent user feedback and global presence, HOTELTIME’s extensive review history and proven track record make it the better choice for hotels seeking a dependable PMS. Do you want to invest in a system with demonstrated user satisfaction and ongoing innovation?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich PMS with proven customer support, go with HOTELTIME. Its extensive modules—including integrated CRS, guest CRM, automation, and payment processing—serve properties of all sizes across multiple regions, making it ideal for hotels aiming for operational excellence.
If, however, your hotel prefers a newer, less tested platform that promises comprehensive management but lacks proven customer feedback, Maxial might be worth exploring. But without recent reviews or regional deployment data, its reliability and support efficacy remain unverified.
For most hoteliers wanting a dependable, globally tested solution, HOTELTIME’s extensive reviews and proven features make it the clear leader. Are you ready to prioritize a system backed by hundreds of recent, positive experiences?
HOTELTIME’s user interface scores 4.66/5, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive layout, quick onboarding, and seamless day-to-day management. Many users highlight its easy learning curve, with support staff praised for helping new staff adapt quickly.
Maxial offers no available ratings or detailed feedback on ease of use, which raises concerns about onboarding and staff adoption. The absence of review data makes it difficult to assess how straightforward the platform is for new users.
Edge: HOTELTIME. Its high ease-of-use score, extensive positive reviews, and clear onboarding process make it the more accessible system for your team.
HOTELTIME boasts 51 unique features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, automated night audit, channel management, online check-in, and more. These functionalities support end-to-end hotel operations and are frequently cited as a major strength.
Maxial provides a broad scope of modules like reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and billing but lacks specifics on unique features or integrations. Without detailed feature differentiation or verified modules, hotel managers lack confidence in its comprehensive capabilities.
Edge: HOTELTIME. Its extensive feature set, including many modules exclusive to HOTELTIME, offers more operational tools for your hotel.
HOTELTIME’s support scores 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and dedicated onboarding assistance. Customers appreciate their ongoing support and the responsiveness that minimizes operational downtime.
Maxial provides no customer support ratings or recent reviews, making it difficult to assess its service quality. The lack of verified user feedback leaves hotel managers uncertain about post-sale support and issue resolution.
Edge: HOTELTIME. With high support ratings and positive recent reviews, it is more reliable for hotel teams needing ongoing assistance.
HOTELTIME integrates with 58 verified partners, including Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, covering a broad range of distribution, revenue, and operational tools. Its open architecture supports third-party integrations crucial for modern hotel management.
Maxial offers no listed integrations or verified partner connections, raising questions about its ability to connect with existing systems or adapt to evolving tech stacks.
Edge: HOTELTIME. Its extensive, verified integration network enables your hotel to build a flexible, interconnected management environment.
HOTELTIME’s user reviews consistently rate it 4.83/5, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability, ease of use, and strong support. Hotels across segments—including resorts, city center hotels, and boutique properties—report high satisfaction levels.
Maxial lacks recent reviews and publicly available ratings, preventing a meaningful comparison. The absence of feedback indicates limited market adoption or user experience data.
Edge: HOTELTIME. Its high, recent ratings and widespread positive feedback make it the preferred choice for hoteliers.
HOTELTIME’s pricing begins at $600 per month without a free trial or tiered options; no specific pricing info is available for Maxial. Given its extensive features and support, HOTELTIME’s cost aligns with its market position as a comprehensive PMS.
Maxial does not disclose pricing details, which complicates budgeting comparisons. Its lack of transparent pricing suggests it may be a bespoke or less mature offering.
Not ideal if:
Hotels that need a flexible, scalable, and fully integrated PMS should consider HOTELTIME. The platform’s breadth of features and robust support infrastructure make it suitable for diverse hotel types.
Not ideal if:
Given the limited publicly available data, Maxial might appeal to innovative hotels open to trying newer solutions but lacks the reassurance of proven performance.
HOTELTIME stands out as a proven, feature-rich PMS with over 430 recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and a strong support network. Its extensive integrations and global presence make it suitable for hotels of all sizes seeking a reliable management platform.
Maxial offers a broad management suite with AI-driven insights but lacks recent reviews, verified integrations, and regional deployment data, making it a less confident choice for most hotels.
For most hoteliers, HOTELTIME provides a safer, more established investment that can support their current needs and future growth. If your priority is stability, support, and proven performance, HOTELTIME is the clear winner.
This comparison reflects the latest data and customer insights, ensuring your decision is based on proven hotel management performance.
According to HTR's product database, HotelTime PMS and Maxial share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
While the support team's responsive and helpful nature is appreciated, some reviews suggest that extended hours for technical support would further en... While the support team's responsive and helpful nature is appreciated, some reviews suggest that extended hours for technical support would further enhance user experience, ensuring assistance at all times, especially for international users.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. HotelTime PMS and Maxial share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. HotelTime PMS offers 58 verified integration partners, while Maxial offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. HotelTime PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
HotelTime PMS: No. Maxial: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HOTELTIME has an HT Score of 92 and Maxial has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor