The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 362 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines in onboarding — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest profiles.
Shiji Group shines when it comes to ease of use , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 362 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 328 | 34 |
After analyzing 362 verified reviews, Clock users most value its feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates, while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 117 reviews | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 157 reviews | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 9 reviews | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 165 reviews | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 80 reviews | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 62 reviews | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 27 reviews | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 30 reviews | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #3 228 reviews | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #11 13 reviews | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #17 2 reviews | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing between Clock PMS by Clock and Shiji Daylight PMS by Shiji Group hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs, size, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in approach, feature depth, and user experience. Clock PMS offers a more mature, feature-rich platform with recent high user satisfaction, whereas Shiji Daylight provides a modern, scalable solution designed for multi-property groups. Which one aligns best with your future plans?
Both Clock PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS are cloud-based systems built to simplify hotel operations, but they solve slightly different problems. Clock’s system emphasizes operational efficiency with extensive features like booking engine, revenue management, and integrated channel management, supporting a wide range of hotel types. Shiji’s platform, meanwhile, centralizes guest data across properties with a robust Single Guest Profile, aiming to deliver personalized service and consistency.
The key difference lies in their focus: Clock PMS is an all-in-one solution that manages reservations, invoicing, housekeeping, and more within a single platform, making it ideal for hotels seeking comprehensive control. Shiji, however, leverages advanced automation and integration tools tailored for groups that need scalable, multi-property management with a focus on guest experience. Do you prioritize operational complexity or guest-centric automation?
If your hotel needs a full-featured, proven system with a high user rating, go with Clock PMS. Its more than 250 recent reviews, with an overall rating of 4.8/5 and a strong NPS score of 9.47/10, indicate high satisfaction across diverse property types, especially independents and boutique hotels.
For hotel groups or chains that require a scalable, cloud-native platform with a focus on centralized data and automation, Shiji Daylight PMS is the better fit. Despite fewer reviews, it maintains a solid 4.63/5 ease-of-use rating and emphasizes guest personalization through its Single Guest Profile. If your hotel is small or growing rapidly, Shiji’s flexible architecture may better serve your needs.
Clock PMS’s user interface receives a stellar 4.78/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive navigation and quick onboarding. Hoteliers emphasize that new staff can learn the system rapidly and that the platform simplifies daily operations significantly.
Shiji Daylight PMS scores slightly lower at 4.63/5 but is still considered very user-friendly, with many users appreciating its modern interface and accessible training materials. However, some report occasional sluggishness during peak periods, which could hinder efficiency.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts seven features unique to its platform, including a booking engine, revenue management module, guest profiles, gift vouchers, mobile app, and guest CRM. These tools combine to provide a comprehensive management experience tailored for busy hotels.
Shiji Daylight, on the other hand, offers 47 features exclusive to its system, such as task management, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, automated reminders, detailed reporting, and guest messaging. Its extensive automation and guest engagement tools support large portfolios with multiple properties.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s support ratings are notably higher, with a 4.75/5 score, and recent reviews describe their support as "responsive," "helpful," and "proactive." Users highlight that Clock’s team resolves issues swiftly and regularly updates the system, ensuring reliability.
Shiji Daylight PMS’s support scores at 4.53/5, with reviews praising the training materials and support team, but some mention occasional delays during system issues. While generally reliable, Clock’s support reputation is more established.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS integrates with 111 verified partners, including popular systems like SiteMinder, SALTO, and Profitroom, with 28 shared integrations. Its extensive API documentation simplifies third-party connections, making it flexible for complex tech stacks.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64 verified integrations, including Oaky, Duetto, Amadeus, and Onyx CenterSource. While its integration count is impressive, some users report occasional reliability issues, particularly with slower response times.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS consistently scores higher across all hotel segments, with an overall rating of 4.8/5 and 251 reviews, most recent in the last six months. Independent hotels and boutique properties favor Clock’s ease of use and comprehensive features.
Shiji Daylight PMS has fewer reviews (32) and a slightly lower overall rating, mostly from larger, multi-property hotels. Its modern interface and automation appeal to hotel groups but are less validated in smaller properties.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no implementation costs or hidden charges, making it transparent and predictable. Shiji’s pricing starts at $1,200 per month, also with no setup fees, reflecting its enterprise-grade capabilities.
While Clock’s more affordable price point appeals to smaller hotels and independents, Shiji’s higher cost aligns with larger, multi-property management needs and more extensive automation features.
Not ideal if you’re a small property with minimal tech needs or prefer a lightweight, niche system.
Not ideal if you operate a small hotel or boutique property that doesn’t need extensive multi-property features.
Clock PMS stands out with its high user ratings, broad feature set, and extensive integrations, making it a robust choice for hotels seeking operational excellence. Its recent reviews underscore its ease of use, support quality, and overall value, especially for boutique and city hotels.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers a modern, scalable platform designed for hotel groups that want centralized guest data and automation. It’s best suited for large portfolios or chains aiming for consistency and personalization across multiple properties.
If your hotel’s priority is a proven, feature-rich, highly-rated system, Clock PMS is the clear choice. For multi-property operators seeking a flexible, cloud-native platform with automation focus, Shiji Daylight PMS is a compelling option.
In conclusion, Clock PMS’s extensive recent positive feedback and higher ratings make it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers today. However, if your hotel or group is growing rapidly and needs a flexible, scalable solution, Shiji Daylight warrants consideration.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Clock PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS share 51 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Gift Vouchers & Prepaid Experiences | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 42 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 10 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Clock PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock PMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock PMS: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 86 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor