The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,465 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in calendar and reservation management — especially for bed & breakfast properties (4.6/5), with exclusive features like Centralized user & role management.
DJUBO shines in Customer Support and Value for Money — especially for resort properties (4.9/5), with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,465 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,443 | 22 |
After analyzing 1,465 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its calendar and reservation management, channel distribution and ota synchronization, reporting, analytics, and dashboards, while DJUBO users highlight channel management and ota synchronization, ease of use / intuitive interface, support and service responsiveness. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Calendar and reservation management
▾
|
+
Channel management and OTA synchronization
▾
|
|
+
Channel distribution and OTA synchronization
▾
|
+
Ease of use / intuitive interface
▾
|
|
+
Reporting, analytics, and dashboards
▾
|
+
Support and service responsiveness
▾
|
|
+
Direct booking engine and website/digital guest engagement
▾
|
+
Reliability / uptime / minimal errors
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support responsiveness and access to humans
▾
|
−
Customization and feature enhancement
▾
|
|
−
Payments, deposits, and billing/invoicing
▾
|
−
Booking engine performance and features
▾
|
|
−
Mobile app limitations
▾
|
−
Mobile app / mobile control
▾
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #2 675 reviews | #16 19 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 179 reviews | #35 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 48 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #11 4 reviews | #24 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 566 reviews | #24 8 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 230 reviews | #26 5 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 117 reviews | #32 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 99 reviews | #34 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 441 reviews | #34 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #4 188 reviews | #43 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #4 342 reviews | #8 19 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 15 reviews | #15 1 reviews |
Cloudbeds and Djubo both provide channel management solutions that synchronize room inventory and rates across OTAs to reduce overbookings and manual updates. They also centralize reservation data for front desk teams to manage bookings more efficiently. The primary divergence lies in scope and market reach: Cloudbeds is a mature all-in-one platform with 208 verified integrations and presence in 109 countries, supporting a broad range of hotel types and sizes. Djubo offers a more consolidated hospitality management suite with tightly integrated PMS, POS, revenue management, and booking engine modules but with only 3 verified integrations and a smaller footprint mainly in Asia Pacific, Africa, and the Middle East.
Cloudbeds excels in global scalability and integration variety, making it suited for properties aiming for multi-channel growth and operational expansion. Djubo’s strength is in unifying core hotel operations within a single platform, appealing to hotels wanting an end-to-end solution without assembling multiple vendors. Both products solve the critical problem of synchronizing channels in real time and improving booking accuracy, but Cloudbeds is stronger in multi-property and multi-market management while Djubo provides deeper operational modules in one system.
If you operate a small to medium property in North America, Europe, or South America, Cloudbeds is the clear choice given its strong presence in 109 countries and 1441 verified reviews averaging 4.6 overall with 188 recent reviews rating 4.8. Its extensive integrations, including advanced AI-driven pricing tools and a marketplace with over 200 partners, support growth and operational depth. Properties like boutiques, hostels, resorts, and B&Bs dominate Cloudbeds’ user base, with segment ratings consistently above 4.4.
If your hotel is in Asia Pacific, Africa, or the Middle East and prefers an integrated PMS, POS, and revenue management suite alongside channel management, Djubo’s all-in-one platform fits better. It has a 4.8 overall rating from 22 reviews but lacks recent review activity, so its current performance may be less clear. Djubo’s 23 unique features, including multilingual and multi-currency support, dynamic pricing, and guest feedback management, cater to properties that want a unified system simplifying operations without integrating multiple vendors.
For luxury or branded hotels, Cloudbeds offers the scalability and analytics needed, evidenced by 230 reviews rating 4.6 and 120 reviews at 4.4 respectively. Djubo’s segment data there is sparse but shows strong ratings from fewer reviews. The decision depends on whether you prioritize a broad global ecosystem or a consolidated operational platform.
Cloudbeds scores 4.6 for ease of use and 4.5 for onboarding across 1441 reviews, while Djubo rates 4.8 and 4.7 respectively from 22 reviews. Both platforms receive praise for intuitive interfaces and streamlined workflows, with Cloudbeds users highlighting drag-and-drop reservation management and fast calendar-based room assignments. Djubo reviewers emphasize a user-friendly design that reduces training time and errors.
Cloudbeds’ larger user base provides a more robust validation of usability across diverse property types and geographies. Some Cloudbeds users report mobile app limitations and occasional feature complexity, while Djubo users note room for improvement in speed and POS functionality. Both products enable front desk teams to manage reservations with minimal friction, though Cloudbeds offers a more mature, scalable dashboard.
Edge: Even.
Djubo leads in feature count with 23 unique hospitality-relevant features not present in Cloudbeds, including a full Property Management System, Point of Sale, Booking Engine, Group Booking Engine, Pricing Intelligence, Housekeeping module, Guest Feedback Management, Native Email Marketing, Revenue Management, Rate Shopping, Metasearch connectivity, and multi-property management. These integrated modules reduce the need for additional third-party systems and simplify workflows by consolidating front desk, revenue, and back-office functions.
Cloudbeds has one unique feature: Centralized user & role management, which supports scalable permission settings across multi-property portfolios. Its strength lies more in the breadth of integrations and AI-powered dynamic pricing embedded in its ecosystem rather than standalone modules.
Operationally, Djubo’s all-in-one suite benefits hotels requiring deep operational control without stitching together multiple systems. Cloudbeds excels where integration with diverse third-party tools and advanced analytics are priorities.
Edge: Djubo.
Cloudbeds has a customer support rating of 4.4 and onboarding at 4.5 from 1441 reviews, while Djubo scores 4.8 and 4.7 respectively from 22 reviews. Djubo reviewers frequently highlight responsive, available support teams who resolve issues promptly and assist with customization. Cloudbeds receives mixed feedback: many praise fast chat help and solid onboarding but some criticize delayed email responses and lack of immediate phone support for urgent issues.
Djubo’s smaller user base limits broad generalization, but its support reputation is strong relative to its scale. Cloudbeds’ large footprint inevitably yields more varied experiences, with support quality often depending on region and issue complexity.
Edge: Djubo.
Cloudbeds leads decisively with 208 verified partners compared to Djubo’s 3. Shared integrations include Tripadvisor and Simplotel, but Cloudbeds uniquely supports integrations with key hotel technologies such as FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access, AdsHotel, and various PMS and channel partners like Sirvoy and HOTELTIME.
Cloudbeds’ vast integration ecosystem enables hotels to customize their tech stack extensively, adding tools for revenue management, guest engagement, payment processing, and more. Djubo offers a tightly integrated suite with limited external connections, suitable for hotels wanting a single vendor solution without third-party integration complexity.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Overall ratings are close: Cloudbeds averages 4.6 across 1441 reviews with 188 recent reviews rating it 4.8, indicating stable or improving satisfaction. Djubo has a higher overall rating of 4.8 but only 22 reviews with no recent feedback, suggesting less current data for trend analysis.
Segment ratings favor Cloudbeds in volume and representativeness. For instance, Bed & Breakfast & Inns rate Cloudbeds 4.6 across 603 reviews versus Djubo’s 4.7 with 9 reviews. Boutique Hotels likewise favor Cloudbeds with 585 reviews at 4.6 compared to Djubo’s 4.7 from 8 reviews. Resorts show Djubo rated 4.9 from 11 reviews, higher than Cloudbeds’ 4.6 from 402 reviews, though Djubo’s sample is smaller.
Given the volume and recency, Cloudbeds’ ratings carry more weight for most hotel segments globally, while Djubo’s high ratings reflect a smaller, possibly regional, user group.
Edge: Even.
Cloudbeds publishes a base price of $200.00 but does not offer freemium, monthly flat, or per-room pricing, nor charges implementation fees or trials. Djubo does not publish pricing details publicly.
Without comparable pricing transparency, hotels must engage vendors directly to obtain tailored quotes. Cloudbeds’ known baseline provides some clarity for budgeting, whereas Djubo’s pricing remains undisclosed, potentially reflecting negotiation based on property size and module selection.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds and Djubo both address the fundamental hotel challenge of channel synchronization and reservation management but diverge sharply in breadth and depth of capabilities. Cloudbeds is a globally established platform with a vast integration ecosystem, AI-powered revenue tools, and a large, diverse user base reflecting consistent high satisfaction and ongoing updates. Djubo offers a tightly integrated all-in-one system combining PMS, POS, channel management, and revenue modules designed for properties seeking operational simplicity under one vendor.
Choose Cloudbeds if your hotel prioritizes global scalability, extensive third-party integrations, and advanced AI-driven pricing strategies. Its ability to support multi-property groups and 208 verified partners makes it ideal for properties targeting growth and operational flexibility. Cloudbeds’ extensive recent review volume and presence across hotel segments provide evidence-based confidence in long-term reliability.
Choose Djubo if you want a unified, end-to-end hospitality management platform with strong customer support and integrated modules including POS and guest feedback management. Djubo’s 23 unique features suit properties in Asia Pacific and adjacent regions looking to consolidate systems and reduce complexity. However, its limited integration ecosystem and lack of recent reviews suggest it fits best where operational consolidation outweighs extensibility.
The verdict hinges on your hotel’s operational complexity, market presence, and appetite for integration versus consolidation. Cloudbeds leads in integration depth, scale, and recent validated performance; Djubo leads in feature consolidation and support ratings within its regional focus.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Rate Management
|
|
|
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates | ||
| Yield Rules | ||
| Derived Rates | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
|
▾
Room Type Mapping
|
|
|
| Channel Self-Mapping | ||
|
▾
Automation & Syncing
|
|
|
| Bulk Updates & Multiple Restrictions | ||
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
|
▾
Administration & Settings
|
|
|
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-Currency Support | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
| Integrated Payment Processing | ||
|
▾
Analytics & Reporting
|
|
|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Booking Performance and Pace Reporting | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| Unlimited Channels (no additional cost) |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The calendar is repeatedly described as the core daily-work tool for front desk teams because it makes it easy to see room status, move bookings, adju... The calendar is repeatedly described as the core daily-work tool for front desk teams because it makes it easy to see room status, move bookings, adjust dates, and manage check-in/check-out. Users like that it simplifies reservation handling and room blocking, though some want split stays, room changes, notes, and editing to be smoother and less error-prone.
Reviewers most often praise Cloudbeds for keeping rates, availability, and reservations synced across OTAs from one place. This reduces manual updates... Reviewers most often praise Cloudbeds for keeping rates, availability, and reservations synced across OTAs from one place. This reduces manual updates, lowers overbooking risk, and saves staff time spent jumping between extranets. A few reviews note occasional sync delays or visibility issues when updates are pending.
Many reviewers value Cloudbeds’ reporting because it helps them track occupancy, revenue, KPIs, and performance across channels. However, users consis... Many reviewers value Cloudbeds’ reporting because it helps them track occupancy, revenue, KPIs, and performance across channels. However, users consistently ask for more customizable, interactive, and faster reports, especially for revenue management, financial analysis, and property-specific views. Several mention that the current reports are useful but can feel hard to search, slow to download, or too spreadsheet-like.
Where hoteliers push back
Support is a major concern in the reviews: some users praise fast chat help, onboarding, and knowledge resources, while others strongly criticize dela... Support is a major concern in the reviews: some users praise fast chat help, onboarding, and knowledge resources, while others strongly criticize delayed email responses and chatbot-first workflows. The most common complaint is the lack of immediate phone support for urgent operational issues, which hotels feel directly affects guest service and revenue when systems break. A smaller group appreciates responsive, knowledgeable agents and solid implementation help.
Cloudbeds is valued for integrated payments, deposit collection, and the ability to handle charges directly in the workflow. This helps hotels secure... Cloudbeds is valued for integrated payments, deposit collection, and the ability to handle charges directly in the workflow. This helps hotels secure bookings, speed up check-in, and keep payment data connected to reservations. But several reviewers want stronger local billing/tax support, better invoice handling, more payment processor options, and smoother payment setup.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
A core strength is keeping room availability and bookings synced across OTAs in real time. Reviewers say this simplifies distribution, reduces manual... A core strength is keeping room availability and bookings synced across OTAs in real time. Reviewers say this simplifies distribution, reduces manual work, and helps avoid operational mistakes across multiple properties and channels.
Users repeatedly say Djubo is simple to learn and operate, even for new staff. The clean layout reduces training time and makes day-to-day hotel opera... Users repeatedly say Djubo is simple to learn and operate, even for new staff. The clean layout reduces training time and makes day-to-day hotel operations easier for busy teams.
Hotels consistently mention quick, personal support when issues arise. Several reviewers say the service team is proactive and dependable enough that... Hotels consistently mention quick, personal support when issues arise. Several reviewers say the service team is proactive and dependable enough that they rarely need help because the system usually runs smoothly.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate that the vendor is willing to assist with customization, but they also want faster rollout of new features and property-specific chan... Users appreciate that the vendor is willing to assist with customization, but they also want faster rollout of new features and property-specific changes. The recurring ask is for a more flexible platform that can adapt quickly to evolving hotel needs.
The booking engine is seen as useful for generating direct bookings and supporting offers like discounts and packages. However, some users say it need... The booking engine is seen as useful for generating direct bookings and supporting offers like discounts and packages. However, some users say it needs speed, design, and usability improvements, suggesting this area still has room to better convert demand into revenue.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds Channel Manager and Djubo (Instaconnekt) share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds Channel Manager offers 208 verified integration partners, while Djubo (Instaconnekt) offers 3. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Djubo (Instaconnekt) leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds Channel Manager: No. Djubo (Instaconnekt): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 98 and DJUBO has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property