The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,242 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Flatswire shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,242 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,242 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,242 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its user-friendly interface, implementation and support, all-in-one ecosystem, while Flatswire users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Flatswire |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-One Ecosystem
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Flatswire |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 592 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 212 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Flatswire |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 473 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 228 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 116 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 93 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Flatswire |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 435 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 163 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #3 226 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 11 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational success and guest experience. Cloudbeds PMS and Flatswire serve different customer needs, but Cloudbeds’ extensive reviews, recent updates, and market presence make it a more compelling choice for hoteliers today. Are you ready to see which system aligns best with your hotel's goals?
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, all-in-one platform trusted by over 1,000 hotels and hostels, with a 4.63-star rating and more recent reviews, reflecting ongoing customer satisfaction. Flatswire, by contrast, has no recent reviews or ratings, providing limited evidence of its current performance or reliability.
While Cloudbeds covers everything from reservations to revenue management with over 64 unique features, Flatswire offers a broader range of property management tools, mainly suited for landlords and property managers rather than hotels. Given the lack of recent user feedback for Flatswire, Cloudbeds’ proven track record suggests it’s better suited for hotel operations needing integrated, reliable management.
If your hotel needs a scalable, user-friendly PMS with robust channel management, reporting, and guest engagement tools, Cloudbeds is the clear winner, especially given its high review volume and recent positive feedback. For properties that prioritize tenant or lease management, Flatswire might be relevant, but its lack of hotel-specific features and recent reviews make it less suitable for your segment.
For hoteliers with multiple properties seeking a solution that centralizes operations, improves revenue strategies, and reduces manual work, Cloudbeds offers proven capabilities with a strong support ecosystem. Conversely, Flatswire appears more targeted at property managers overseeing rentals and units rather than hotel-specific needs.
Cloudbeds scores a 4.61/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users highlight that staff across departments find it simple to adapt, which speeds up staff training and daily operations.
In contrast, Flatswire’s usability is less documented, and with no recent reviews, it’s difficult to assess how easily your team could adopt this system. Given Cloudbeds’ high usability ratings backed by over 1,000 recent reviews, it clearly offers a more accessible experience.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 64 unique features, including a channel manager, revenue management, online check-in, automated night audit, guest messaging, native email marketing, and extensive integrations with over 190 verified partners. These features support every aspect of hotel management, from reservations to guest engagement.
Flatswire, by comparison, lacks detailed feature counts or hotel-specific functionalities, focusing mainly on property management, tenant relations, and maintenance tools. Its offerings are more tailored for landlords and property managers, not hoteliers.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support scores a 4.41/5, with recent reviews describing their support team as responsive, attentive, and instrumental in onboarding. Customers highlight that support is quick and effective, especially during implementation and troubleshooting.
Flatswire provides no recent reviews or ratings, making support quality difficult to evaluate. Based on available data, Cloudbeds’ well-documented, responsive customer service is clearly more trusted by users.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds integrates with 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment providers, and property management tools, providing a seamless operational ecosystem. Over 300 booking channels are supported for real-time inventory synchronization.
Flatswire has no publicly available data on integrations, suggesting limited connectivity options or a narrower ecosystem. For a hotel relying on diverse distribution channels and third-party tools, Cloudbeds offers a significant advantage in connectivity.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ 4.63/5 rating and over 1,000 recent reviews indicate high satisfaction among hoteliers across different segments, from boutique hotels to hostels. Hotels frequently praise its ease of use, support, and revenue tools.
Flatswire has no recent ratings or reviews, so there is no current hoteliers’ feedback to gauge its performance. Given its lack of recent customer data, Cloudbeds clearly has higher hotelier approval.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ base price is $600/month, with no free trial or freemium model, reflecting its positioning as a premium, feature-rich solution. Pricing for Flatswire is not publicly available, but the lack of transparent pricing suggests it may be tailored or less competitive.
For hoteliers seeking predictable costs aligned with a proven platform, Cloudbeds offers transparent pricing, while Flatswire’s unclear pricing may be a barrier.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on niche tenant management or has minimal online distribution.
Not ideal if your hotel requires integrated booking, revenue management, or guest communication tools.
Cloudbeds stands out as a top-tier PMS with a proven track record, extensive features, and high user ratings, making it the most reliable choice for hotels. Its recent reviews and wide adoption across segments support its position as a trusted, scalable platform.
Choose Cloudbeds if your focus is on operational efficiency, revenue growth, and guest satisfaction through a unified, easy-to-use system. Flatswire may suit property managers with a focus on lease or tenant management, but its lack of recent hotel-specific reviews limits its appeal for hoteliers.
If you want a system that simplifies your management and drives measurable results, Cloudbeds is the clear choice.
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds PMS and Flatswire share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Flatswire |
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 52 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training.... Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training. This ease of use is particularly beneficial for daily operations such as managing reservations and performing check-in/check-out processes.
Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsivenes... Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsiveness and assistance, complete feature parity on mobile and integration capabilities require more comprehensive support for a smoother transition.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multip... Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multiple systems, minimizing manual work and synchronizing operations in real time.
Where hoteliers push back
Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administra... Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administrative load, errors, and improves overall operational productivity. The system's drag-and-drop functionality is highlighted as particularly useful.
While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be va... While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be valuable for strategic decisions. This is a recurring theme among those seeking deeper analytics and visualization.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds PMS and Flatswire share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds PMS offers 189 verified integration partners, while Flatswire offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds PMS: No. Flatswire: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 100 and Flatswire has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor