Sorry, this functionality is only available for verified hoteliers
The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Cloudbeds PMS vs. GRAND PMS:
Which Is Right for You?
TLDR
We analyzed 1,242 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
GRAND shines .
How Does Cloudbeds PMS Compare to GRAND PMS?
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,242 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1,242 | 0 |
What Are the Pros and Cons of Cloudbeds PMS vs GRAND PMS?
After analyzing 1,242 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its user-friendly interface, implementation and support, all-in-one ecosystem, while GRAND users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-One Ecosystem
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
Cloudbeds vs GRAND: Rankings by Hotel Segment
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 592 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 212 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 473 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 228 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 116 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 93 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 435 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 163 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #3 226 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 11 reviews | — |
The Decision
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and GRAND PMS hinges on your property’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to centralize operations and improve efficiency, but Cloudbeds stands out with its proven market presence and extensive review base. GRAND, meanwhile, is a newer offering with promising automation features, but lacks the user feedback volume and recent reviews that validate its performance. So, which platform is the right fit for your hotel?
Is Cloudbeds or GRAND Better for Hotels?
Cloudbeds has established itself as a leading PMS with over 1,071 recent reviews, a 4.63/5 rating, and a 91% likelihood to recommend. It offers a comprehensive, all-in-one platform that integrates property management, channel management, booking engine, and revenue tools, making it ideal for properties seeking a proven, mature system. GRAND, on the other hand, is a newer, less-reviewed platform with no available review data, focusing on a unified system that includes event management and AI-driven automation. Can a newer product with limited feedback truly match Cloudbeds’ reliability?
Cloudbeds vs GRAND: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable system with proven success across diverse property types, go with Cloudbeds. It’s especially suitable for independent hotels, boutique properties, hostels, and resorts looking to automate revenue, distribution, and operations with a trusted solution. But if your operation combines hotel and venue management and you prioritize innovative automation and event features, GRAND could appeal—though its limited review data makes this a risk for now.
Is Cloudbeds or GRAND Easier to Use?
Cloudbeds boasts a 4.61/5 ease-of-use rating backed by over 1,000 recent reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. It offers a mobile app, automation, and a well-organized dashboard that minimize staff training time. GRAND's interface is described as modern and collaborative, but with no user reviews available, it's difficult to gauge ease of use or onboarding experience. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Which Has Better Features: Cloudbeds or GRAND?
Cloudbeds offers over 50 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, revenue management, online check-in, integrated payment processing, and a housekeeping module. GRAND integrates bookings, housekeeping, billing, and event management but lacks detailed feature counts or unique modules listed publicly. Cloudbeds’ feature breadth and proven integrations give it a clear edge. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Which Has Better Customer Support: Cloudbeds or GRAND?
Cloudbeds has a customer support rating of 4.41/5, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness, helpfulness, and 24/7 support availability. Users frequently commend its prompt support, especially during onboarding and technical troubleshooting. GRAND, being a newer product, has no publicly available reviews or support ratings. Based on available data, Cloudbeds supports your team better during critical moments. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Which Has More Integrations: Cloudbeds or GRAND?
Cloudbeds connects with over 190 verified partners, including popular OTAs and property tools, allowing seamless real-time synchronization and third-party integrations. GRAND does not currently list verified integrations or a partner count, suggesting limited or unverified connectivity options. For properties relying on extensive integrations to streamline operations, Cloudbeds is clearly more capable. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cloudbeds or GRAND?
Cloudbeds’ recent reviews, totaling over 1,000 in the last six months, reflect high satisfaction across property types—average ratings of 4.63/5 and a 91% recommendation rate. No reviews are available for GRAND, making it impossible to compare hoteliers’ satisfaction or segment-specific ratings. Given current data, Cloudbeds is the more trusted choice. Edge: Cloudbeds.
How Much Do Cloudbeds and GRAND Cost?
Cloudbeds pricing starts at $600 monthly per property, with no free tier or trial mentioned. GRAND’s pricing is listed at $900, also without trial or freemium options. Since detailed feature-based or tiered pricing details aren’t available for GRAND, Cloudbeds offers a slightly lower starting point, which might influence budget-conscious properties.
What Type of Hotel Should Use Cloudbeds?
- Hotels that want a proven, all-in-one platform with extensive integrations.
- Properties seeking reliable, user-friendly tools for revenue, distribution, and operations.
- Teams that prioritize a mature platform with a large support community.
- Not ideal if you prefer a highly specialized or niche solution with minimal reviews.
What Type of Hotel Should Use GRAND?
- Hotels and venues combining accommodation and event spaces.
- Teams seeking a modern, AI-driven automation platform with cross-department collaboration.
- Properties interested in booking, billing, and event proposals within one system.
- Not ideal if you rely heavily on a mature, proven platform with extensive third-party integrations.
Cloudbeds vs GRAND: The Bottom Line for Hotels
Cloudbeds is the clear leader due to its extensive review history, proven track record, and broad feature set. It is well-suited for hotels that need a reliable, scalable, and easy-to-use platform for daily operations, revenue, and distribution. GRAND shows promise with its integrated event management and AI features but lacks the data and user feedback to confidently recommend it for now.
If your hotel values a trusted, tested system with recent, positive reviews, choose Cloudbeds. It has proven its ability to support diverse property types worldwide, making it the safer, more reliable choice.
However, if you have a unique venue or event-heavy operation eager for cutting-edge automation and are willing to accept the current limited feedback, GRAND could be worth exploring further—though its long-term reliability remains to be validated.
In summary, for most hotels seeking a mature, well-supported system that delivers on operational needs today, Cloudbeds is the definitive option. GRAND might be suitable for innovative venues with specific needs but comes with greater uncertainty at this stage.
Which Features Does Cloudbeds PMS Have That GRAND PMS Doesn't (and Vice Versa)?
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds PMS and GRAND PMS share 14 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 38 more features differ between these products.
Real-World Results: Cloudbeds vs GRAND by Business Goal
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
Cloudbeds vs GRAND: The Bottom Line
What hoteliers love
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training.... Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training. This ease of use is particularly beneficial for daily operations such as managing reservations and performing check-in/check-out processes.
Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsivenes... Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsiveness and assistance, complete feature parity on mobile and integration capabilities require more comprehensive support for a smoother transition.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multip... Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multiple systems, minimizing manual work and synchronizing operations in real time.
Where hoteliers push back
Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administra... Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administrative load, errors, and improves overall operational productivity. The system's drag-and-drop functionality is highlighted as particularly useful.
While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be va... While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be valuable for strategic decisions. This is a recurring theme among those seeking deeper analytics and visualization.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
Frequently Asked Questions About Cloudbeds PMS vs GRAND PMS
Can Cloudbeds PMS replace GRAND PMS?
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds PMS and GRAND PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds PMS offers 189 verified integration partners, while GRAND PMS offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Which is better for small or independent hotels?
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Do Cloudbeds PMS or GRAND PMS offer a free plan?
Cloudbeds PMS: No. GRAND PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
How Does HTR Evaluate and Rank Cloudbeds PMS and GRAND PMS?
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 100 and GRAND has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
What Other Property Management Systems Comparisons Are Hoteliers Reading?
Explore more head-to-head comparisons based on verified hotelier reviews.
Contents
Get personalized product recommendations
Product recommendations advisor
