The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,242 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Roombler shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,242 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,242 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,242 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its user-friendly interface, implementation and support, all-in-one ecosystem, while Roombler users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-One Ecosystem
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 592 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 212 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 473 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 228 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 116 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 93 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 435 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 163 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #3 226 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 11 reviews | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Roombler hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, multi-feature platform suited for ambitious hotels seeking scalability and integration, while Roombler targets small accommodation owners who prioritize mobile management and simplicity. Both solve core property management challenges but diverge sharply in scope and sophistication. Are you ready to invest in a robust, enterprise-ready system or prefer a lightweight, mobile-centric solution?
Cloudbeds and Roombler address the fundamental need for efficient property management but differ greatly in scale and feature set. Cloudbeds provides a full suite of tools—including channel management, revenue optimization, and extensive integrations—that serve complex operations and multiple properties. Roombler, however, is designed for individual or small-scale properties, offering streamlined booking and guest management via mobile. Which system aligns better with your current size and future growth plans?
Cloudbeds’s strengths lie in its broad feature set and global presence, supporting properties across 101 countries with over 1,071 reviews, 81 in the last six months. Roombler’s minimal review footprint indicates a niche, lightweight approach, but lacks publicly available recent user feedback or extensive features. Will your property benefit from Cloudbeds’ expansive capabilities or find Roombler’s simplicity more suitable?
If your hotel needs a full enterprise property management system with multi-channel distribution, revenue management, and extensive automation, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. It’s well-suited for boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains aiming for growth, as evidenced by its high ratings and recent positive reviews emphasizing ease of use, support, and revenue uplift.
Conversely, if your operation is small—perhaps a single property or a few guesthouses—and you prioritize managing bookings from your iPhone with minimal setup, Roombler fits this profile. It’s ideal for owners who want a straightforward, mobile app to oversee bookings and guest stays without the complexity of a full PMS. Can your operation justify Cloudbeds’ larger investment, or does Roombler’s simplicity meet your current needs?
Cloudbeds’s user-friendly interface boasts a 4.61/5 ease-of-use rating from over 1,000 reviews, with many praising its intuitive design and mobile access. Users highlight its straightforward reservation workflows and simple onboarding, though some note that initial setup can be complex.
Roombler’s interface is designed for simplicity and mobility, managed entirely through iPhone or iPad apps. While specific ratings aren’t available, user testimonials emphasize ease of use and managing bookings on the go. However, the lack of detailed review data makes it hard to compare directly.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive suite of 64 unique features, including channel management, revenue tools, online check-in, automated night audit, guest CRM, and integrated payment processing. It supports multi-lingual, multi-currency operations, and extensive integrations with over 190 verified partners.
Roombler provides essential guest and booking management tools within its app but lacks the depth of features seen in Cloudbeds. It does not support multi-channel distribution, revenue management, or complex automation, making it suitable for very small operations.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support team scores 4.41/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and comprehensive onboarding. Many users cite prompt technical assistance and ongoing support that helps streamline operations.
Roombler has no publicly available review data or support ratings, but given its small team size and niche market, support is likely more personalized but less extensive. The lack of recent, detailed feedback suggests Cloudbeds’s support is more established and reliable.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and property systems like HotelTime, Trevo, and HiJiffy. Its open API and extensive marketplace facilitate seamless connections—critical for broader distribution and operational automation.
Roombler, as a standalone mobile app, does not publicly list integrations or third-party connections. Its simplicity is designed for small-scale use without the need for extensive integrations.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s 4.63/5 overall rating from 1,071 reviews indicates strong, consistent satisfaction across many hotel segments. Hoteliers highlight its ease of use, support, and revenue growth, especially in boutique, hostel, and small hotel categories.
Roombler’s limited review data prevents a definitive comparison, but its niche appeal suggests high satisfaction among small property owners who value mobility and simplicity. However, without recent comprehensive reviews, Cloudbeds’s ratings are more reliable and representative.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a base price of $600/month, with no free trial or freemium version. It offers a full, integrated platform with a broad feature set suited for scaling operations.
Roombler’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, but it is positioned as an affordable, mobile app-based solution for individual operators. Its lower cost and simpler setup make it appealing for small properties with limited budgets.
Not ideal if your operation is very small, with minimal staff, or primarily relies on manual management without growth plans.
Not ideal if you need detailed reports, automated revenue management, or multi-property support.
Cloudbeds is a full-featured property management system designed for properties ready to grow and scale. Its extensive integrations, revenue tools, and support make it suitable for boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains aiming for operational and commercial expansion.
Roombler excels as a straightforward, mobile-centric app for small operators managing one or a few properties. Its simplicity benefits owners who prioritize ease of use over advanced automation.
Choose Cloudbeds if you need a scalable, feature-rich PMS that can handle complex operations and future growth. Opt for Roombler if your focus is on simple booking management and guest communication from mobile devices.
In conclusion, for most hotels with ambitions to expand and streamline, Cloudbeds’s recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive capabilities make it the superior choice. Roombler is best suited for small-scale, owner-managed properties prioritizing mobility and simplicity.
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds PMS and Roombler share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 52 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
Roombler
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
Roombler
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
Roombler
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training.... Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training. This ease of use is particularly beneficial for daily operations such as managing reservations and performing check-in/check-out processes.
Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsivenes... Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsiveness and assistance, complete feature parity on mobile and integration capabilities require more comprehensive support for a smoother transition.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multip... Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multiple systems, minimizing manual work and synchronizing operations in real time.
Where hoteliers push back
Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administra... Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administrative load, errors, and improves overall operational productivity. The system's drag-and-drop functionality is highlighted as particularly useful.
While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be va... While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be valuable for strategic decisions. This is a recurring theme among those seeking deeper analytics and visualization.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds PMS and Roombler share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds PMS offers 189 verified integration partners, while Roombler offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds PMS: No. Roombler: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 100 and Roombler has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor