The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,242 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Softstar shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,242 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,242 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,242 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its user-friendly interface, implementation and support, all-in-one ecosystem, while Softstar users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Softstar |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-One Ecosystem
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 592 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 212 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 473 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 228 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 116 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 93 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 435 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 163 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #3 226 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 11 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Cloudbeds PMS by Cloudbeds and Softstar serve different hospitality sectors, with Cloudbeds primarily designed for hotels, hostels, and vacation rentals, while Softstar caters more to rental property managers. Both aim to streamline operations, but their core features and user experiences differ significantly—how do you decide which is better suited for your needs?
Cloudbeds has a sizable user base and a proven track record, with over 1,000 recent reviews and a 4.63/5 overall rating, making it the more credible choice. Conversely, Softstar, with zero reviews and no recent customer feedback, lacks the community validation that Cloudbeds benefits from.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, all-in-one platform for hospitality properties, integrating PMS, channel management, booking engines, and revenue tools within a single system. It is built to serve a broad range of accommodations, from boutique hotels and hostels to resorts, with over 190 verified integrations and a presence in 101 countries, making it highly scalable.
Softstar, on the other hand, appears tailored for rental property management, focusing on automating tenant tracking, maintenance, and financial reporting. It lacks a broad integration ecosystem and international market presence, which limits its appeal for multi-property hotel operations seeking a unified solution.
Given Cloudbeds' extensive feature set, global reach, and recent high customer ratings, it’s clear that Cloudbeds is more suited for hotels needing operational integration and growth support. Does your hotel prioritize a broad, proven platform over specialized rental management tools?
If your hotel requires a flexible, easy-to-use system that consolidates reservations, channel management, revenue, and guest communication, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its user-friendly interface, rated 4.61/5 for ease of use based on recent reviews, makes onboarding and staff adoption straightforward—crucial for busy teams.
Softstar might be suitable if your property focuses exclusively on long-term rentals or tenant management, with a need for detailed financial analytics and maintenance automation. However, with no recent reviews or user feedback, it’s hard to verify its effectiveness for hotel operations.
For most hotels aiming to streamline daily tasks, increase direct bookings, and scale efficiently, Cloudbeds’s proven capabilities and recent customer satisfaction make it the more reliable option.
Cloudbeds’s intuitive, visually clean interface receives a 4.61/5 rating from recent users, who praise its straightforward navigation and minimal training requirements. Its onboarding process, rated 4.45/5, ensures new staff can quickly become proficient, and the platform’s mobile accessibility supports remote management.
Softstar offers automation tailored for property managers but lacks recent reviews or detailed user feedback, making it difficult to assess its usability. Its design and onboarding process are unverified, raising questions about how easily staff can adapt.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 64 exclusive features, including a channel manager connecting to 190 verified partners, a customizable booking engine, revenue management, integrated payment processing, and guest communication tools. It supports multi-lingual, multi-currency operations and offers modules for housekeeping, task management, and digital check-ins.
Softstar’s feature set is focused on tenant tracking, maintenance, and financial reporting, with AI-driven insights for property performance. It does not offer the extensive operational tools or integrations relevant to hotel management.
With a broader and deeper feature set, Cloudbeds provides a one-stop platform for hotels looking to manage their entire operation efficiently.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support team is consistently rated 4.41/5, with recent reviews highlighting quick, attentive assistance and a responsive support staff. Users appreciate the ongoing onboarding help and the ease of resolving issues, often describing their support experience as empathetic and reliable.
Softstar, lacking recent reviews or community feedback, cannot be confidently evaluated on support quality. Its smaller size suggests limited availability of dedicated support, especially for complex hotel needs.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds excels with 190 verified partner integrations, including popular booking channels, payment systems, and property management tools, supporting seamless data flow and operational efficiency. Its marketplace includes integrations with KASAccess, Atomize, and many other third-party apps, facilitating scalability.
Softstar offers no publicly available verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options. This restricts the ability to connect with external systems, a critical drawback for hotels needing a unified tech stack.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s recent reviews consistently rate it above 4.5/5, with hotel segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties providing positive feedback on ease of use, feature richness, and support. Hotels like The Brannan Cottage Inn and South Wind Motel praise its reliability and operational impact.
Softstar, with no recent reviews or ratings, cannot be benchmarked. Its lack of community validation suggests it isn’t favored or widely adopted among hoteliers.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no free trial or freemium options. Its transparent pricing model reflects its extensive feature offering and global support.
Softstar’s pricing details are unavailable, and without a free trial or clear fee structure, assessing its value is challenging. Its limited market presence and absence of recent customer feedback imply a less competitive pricing approach.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if your hotel operates solely with long-term rentals or is a large enterprise requiring bespoke, highly specialized solutions.
Not ideal if your hotel needs multi-property management, comprehensive guest engagement, or extensive integrations.
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, reliable platform built for the needs of hotels, hostels, and short-term rentals. Its extensive features, integrations, recent high reviews, and international presence make it a clear choice for properties aiming for operational excellence and growth.
Softstar remains unproven in recent customer satisfaction and lacks the breadth of integrations or global reach. Without recent validation, it’s best suited for rental managers rather than hotel operators.
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable, and feature-rich system, Cloudbeds is the definitive option. Softstar’s niche appeal and limited community support make it a less attractive choice for hospitality professionals.
In conclusion, Cloudbeds’s large, recent review base, high ratings, and extensive capabilities establish it as the more trusted, versatile PMS for hotels. Its proven track record and global presence make it a safe investment for hoteliers seeking to streamline operations, increase revenue, and enhance guest experiences.
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds PMS and Softstar share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 52 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training.... Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training. This ease of use is particularly beneficial for daily operations such as managing reservations and performing check-in/check-out processes.
Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsivenes... Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsiveness and assistance, complete feature parity on mobile and integration capabilities require more comprehensive support for a smoother transition.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multip... Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multiple systems, minimizing manual work and synchronizing operations in real time.
Where hoteliers push back
Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administra... Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administrative load, errors, and improves overall operational productivity. The system's drag-and-drop functionality is highlighted as particularly useful.
While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be va... While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be valuable for strategic decisions. This is a recurring theme among those seeking deeper analytics and visualization.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds PMS and Softstar share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds PMS offers 189 verified integration partners, while Softstar offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds PMS: No. Softstar: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 100 and Softstar has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor