The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is pivotal for your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) and Infor HMS aim to simplify your workflows, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and user experience. While CMS Hospitality’s platform is newer with limited recent reviews, Infor boasts a robust, well-supported product with a large user base and extensive integrations. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Both CMS Hospitality and Infor HMS are designed to streamline hotel operations, from reservations to reporting. CMS Hospitality, with nearly no recent reviews and a smaller footprint, claims to provide enterprise-level solutions with 30 years’ industry experience, focusing on reliability and support. Conversely, Infor offers a mature, cloud-based system with a strong global presence, boasting a comprehensive feature set including housekeeping, revenue management, and mobile support.
CMS Hospitality’s limited review data makes it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction, whereas Infor’s 46 recent reviews and a high 4.04/5 overall rating reveal consistent, positive feedback. Hoteliers often cite ease of use and support responsiveness with Infor; CMS Hospitality’s recent user experiences are less visible, raising questions about ongoing satisfaction. Do you prioritize a proven, data-backed platform, or are you open to emerging solutions with fewer recent reviews?
If your hotel needs a flexible, enterprise-level PMS with a long industry track record and active support, Infor is the clear choice. It is best suited for hotels seeking extensive features like housekeeping, revenue management, multi-lingual support, and integrations with over 100 partners, making it ideal for mid-sized to large properties.
If your hotel is smaller, or you value a more personalized, less complex solution, CMS Hospitality could fit—although the lack of recent reviews and limited feature info is a concern. It might serve properties that need core management tools without extensive customization, but be cautious if you require proven scalability or extensive integrations. Overall, Infor’s proven presence and broad feature set make it the more reliable option for most hotels.
Infor’s user interface scores close to 3.88/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive navigation and quick onboarding, especially for staff accustomed to modern, web-based platforms. Support ratings are strong at 4.04/5, with reviewers emphasizing prompt, helpful assistance, and onboarding typically takes about 3.64/5.
CMS Hospitality, on the other hand, scores 0/5 across all ease-of-use metrics, with no recent reviews to confirm current usability. Historically, it’s positioned as a reliable enterprise system, but with minimal recent user feedback, its ease of adoption remains unverified. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor boasts 20 unique features, including housekeeping modules, online support, guest profiles, calendar views, direct billing, multi-currency, revenue management, and automated night audits. These functionalities are designed to cover comprehensive hotel operations and offer customization through reports and user roles.
CMS Hospitality provides no additional features beyond core PMS functions, relying on its integrated enterprise-level solutions, which may lack some specialized modules that Infor offers. Its limited feature set indicates a focus on fundamental management functions rather than advanced operational tools. Edge: Infor HMS.
Based on available data, Infor’s customer support scores 4.04/5, with reviews praising their responsiveness and professionalism, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Support staff are known to guide users effectively through issues, which is critical for minimizing downtime.
CMS Hospitality’s support ratings are unreported, and with no recent reviews, it’s unclear whether their support meets current industry standards. Given Infor’s extensive support network and ongoing customer satisfaction, it’s the safer choice for reliable assistance. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor offers 113 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Revinate, Duetto, and Cendyn, covering booking engines, revenue tools, and guest analytics. These integrations enable a more connected, automated hotel operation.
CMS Hospitality supports just 12 verified partners, including some key players like Sage and STAAH, but with fewer options overall. The limited integrations may restrict your ability to connect all your operational tools efficiently. Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 recent reviews, Infor’s users rate it at 4.04/5, with many praising its comprehensive features and ease of use across hotel types, especially mid-sized and larger properties. Smaller and boutique hotels also appreciate its scalability.
CMS Hospitality’s review data is nonexistent, thus lacking recent feedback or ratings. Without current user experience data, it’s difficult to recommend it confidently. Given the strong recent ratings, Infor’s reputation is clearly more trusted. Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for both systems are not publicly disclosed. Typically, these platforms involve custom quotes based on hotel size, feature needs, and implementation scope. Expect to negotiate based on your hotel’s specific requirements.
Not ideal if your hotel demands advanced features like revenue management or extensive automation, as CMS Hospitality offers a more basic feature set.
Small boutique properties or those with limited IT support might find Infor’s comprehensive features overwhelming or unnecessary.
The core difference is that Infor offers a mature, feature-rich platform with a strong global presence, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction. CMS Hospitality, while promising, currently has limited recent data and feature info, making it less reliable for most hotels.
Choose Infor if your hotel needs a proven, scalable system that supports complex operations and extensive integrations. Its widespread support, recent positive reviews, and comprehensive features make it the safer, more dependable choice.
Opt for CMS Hospitality if your property is smaller, less complex, and you value a solution with a long industry history—though be cautious about the lack of recent reviews and limited features. Its future performance remains less certain without current user feedback.
This comprehensive comparison aims to help you make an informed decision aligned with your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational needs. Prioritize systems with recent, positive reviews and features that match your strategic goals.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) offers 12 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix): No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor