The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 385 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines when it comes to feature richness — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest profiles.
Counter shines when it comes to user interface and usability .
Side-by-side ratings based on 385 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 328 | 57 |
After analyzing 385 verified reviews, Clock users most value its feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates, while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 117 reviews | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 157 reviews | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 9 reviews | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 165 reviews | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 80 reviews | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 62 reviews | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 27 reviews | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 30 reviews | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #3 228 reviews | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #11 13 reviews | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | #17 2 reviews | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing between Clock PMS by Clock and Counter by Counter hinges on your property’s size, complexity, and guest service needs. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but Clock PMS offers a broad, feature-rich platform geared toward hotels of various types, while Counter is tailored specifically for hostels seeking simplicity and mobility. How do these differences align with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Clock PMS tackles the challenge of managing a wide array of hotel operations—from reservations and rates to guest communication and analytics—within a single platform. Counter, on the other hand, simplifies hostel management with an intuitive, mobile-friendly interface focused on guest check-in, check-out, and reservations. Do you prioritize extensive features or ease of use?
Clock PMS and Counter aim to improve your hotel’s daily workflow, but they diverge significantly in scope and target market. Clock PMS is an extensive, multi-functional system suited to properties that need deep customization, automation, and integrations, especially in higher-end, multi-property, or complex environments. Counter is designed for hostels, emphasizing straightforward operations, quick onboarding, and mobility, ideal for small-scale, high-volume hostels with a preference for minimal manual work.
Clock PMS boasts a review count of 251 with recent reviews, reflecting a mature, well-supported system. Counter has only 54 reviews, with no reviews in the last six months, indicating a smaller, perhaps less tested platform. Given the more recent and numerous reviews, Clock PMS’s data should be considered more reliable for decision-making. Are you looking for a comprehensive hotel management solution or a lightweight system for a hostel?
If your property is a large, full-service hotel, chain, or resort that requires extensive automation, multi-channel distribution, and in-depth reporting, Clock PMS is the clear choice. It supports multiple currencies, languages, and integrations, making it suitable for properties with international guests or multiple locations. Its features like digital check-in, guest portals, and revenue management modules cater to complex operational environments.
Conversely, if your property is a hostel or small accommodation that values simplicity, mobility, and quick training, Counter is more appropriate. It’s free, easy to set up, and works seamlessly on mobile browsers, making it perfect for hostels with high guest turnover. If you need advanced revenue management or multi-property support, Counter’s capabilities are limited.
In summary, go with Clock PMS if your hotel needs robust features and customization. Choose Counter if you prioritize ease of use, speed, and affordability for a hostel environment.
Clock PMS scores a 4.78/5 for ease of use based on user reviews, praised for its intuitive interface and simple staff training. Its onboarding experience is rated 4.71/5, but some users note the extensive features can be overwhelming initially. The system’s complexity sometimes leads to longer setup times, and occasional cryptic error messages have been reported.
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its straightforward, mobile-friendly interface that staff find easy to learn. Its minimalist design and high responsiveness make daily operations smooth for small teams. Support responsiveness is excellent, with many users citing quick assistance from the Counter team.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 39 features exclusive to its platform, including integrated CRS, revenue management, guest profiles, multi-currency/language support, digital registration, integrated payment terminals, guest app, online check-in/out, and task management. These features support complex hotel operations and automation, providing a comprehensive management environment.
Counter provides 19 shared features, including reservations, POS integration, automatic payments, and basic reporting. However, it lacks the extensive automation, multi-language support, and advanced revenue tools Clock offers. Its features are sufficient for small hostels but not comparable in depth or breadth.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS is rated 4.75/5 for customer support, praised for its responsive, proactive team that frequently responds quickly to queries. Users appreciate the ongoing updates and support, though some mention occasional delays in resolving reporting or error issues.
Counter exceeds with a 4.96/5 rating, with reviews emphasizing the support team’s helpfulness, quick responses, and professionalism. Users like Evelyn and Max for their consistent assistance, though some users note support can be slower in certain time zones.
Edge: Counter.
Clock PMS boasts 111 verified integrations, including major partners like SiteMinder, Stripe, Goki, and RevControl, with four shared partners. Its extensive API and large partner network enable seamless connectivity with numerous booking engines, revenue tools, and channel managers.
Counter has only 7 verified integrations, including Stripe, GOKI, and WuBook, with some notable regional channel limitations. Its smaller ecosystem means fewer options for expanding connectivity but may suffice for basic needs.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS has an overall rating of 4.8/5 based on 251 reviews, with recent feedback confirming its reliability, extensive features, and excellent support. Independent hotels and boutique properties particularly rate Clock highly, with some giving it near-perfect scores for operational efficiency and user experience.
Counter’s rating is 4.73/5 from 54 reviews, primarily from hostel operators. While highly rated for simplicity and support, its limited feature set means it’s often seen as suitable only for basic hostel operations without complex requirements.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS costs $600 per month with no freemium or tiered plans, representing a significant investment but with no hidden fees. Its pricing reflects its enterprise-level feature set, integrations, and support.
Counter is free to use, making it an attractive choice for hostels with tight budgets. However, its limited features and scalability may necessitate upgrades or additional tools as your property grows.
Not ideal if your property is very small or only needs basic reservation management.
Not ideal if you require multi-property management, detailed revenue analytics, or extensive automation.
Clock PMS offers a robust, feature-packed platform suitable for larger, complex hotels and chains. Its high review count, recent positive feedback, and extensive integrations make it a reliable choice for properties seeking automation and customization.
Counter excels in simplicity, affordability, and mobility for small hostels, especially those with high guest turnover and limited operational complexity. Its high support ratings and ease of use make it ideal for small teams prioritizing quick setup and operations.
If your hotel needs a full-featured, scalable PMS, go with Clock PMS. If you operate a hostel or small property that values simplicity and mobility, Counter is the better fit.
According to HTR's product database, Clock PMS and Counter share 19 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 27 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
It depends on your requirements. Clock PMS and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock PMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock PMS: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 86 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor