The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 59 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines when it comes to user interface and usability , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
e4jconnect shines in ease of use and onboarding , with exclusive features like Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Centralized Messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 59 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 2 |
After analyzing 59 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while e4jconnect users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | #45 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | #71 0 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | #43 1 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing the right PMS for your hotel or hostel is crucial for streamlining operations, improving guest satisfaction, and boosting revenue. You’re weighing Counter, a system acclaimed for its ease of use and flexible features, against e4jconnect, known for its advanced integrations and detailed reporting. Both aim to solve common hospitality management issues but diverge significantly in their strengths. Which platform aligns best with your property’s needs?
Counter excels in simplicity and user-friendliness, especially for hostels and small properties, while e4jconnect offers a more robust feature set suited for varied property types. Are you ready to make an informed choice based on the data?
Counter is designed specifically for hostels, with a focus on ease of use, quick onboarding, and simple management of bookings and guest data. Its user-friendly interface and mobile accessibility have earned it high praise, especially from hostel operators and smaller properties.
e4jconnect, by contrast, is a more comprehensive PMS that integrates tightly with WordPress and Joomla websites, offering advanced automation, detailed reporting, and extensive customization options. It’s often preferred by properties that need more granular control over operations or already have a website built on these CMS platforms.
Though Counter has more recent reviews—54 in the last six months—and a higher overall rating (4.73/5), e4jconnect’s review count remains low at just 2, limiting its current performance data. Which of these differences is more critical for your property’s growth?
If your hotel is a hostel or small property prioritizing ease of use, quick deployment, and cost-effective operations, Counter is the clear choice. Its intuitive interface, mobile-friendly design, and features tailored for hostels—like group booking and housekeeping modules—are ideal for fast-paced environments.
Conversely, if your property requires detailed analytics, automation, and integration with your WordPress or Joomla website, e4jconnect offers more features—17 exclusive ones, including guest messaging, online check-in, and payment requests. Its pricing at $100/month may be justified for properties seeking in-depth customization and control.
For properties with limited tech staff or a need for rapid onboarding, Counter’s simplicity wins. For those with technical capacity or seeking more extensive functionality, e4jconnect might be more suitable.
Counter’s ease of use is evident from its 4.6/5 rating and 54 recent reviews, with many users describing it as “simple,” “understandable,” and “easy to learn.” Its mobile browser interface allows on-the-go management, and onboarding ratings (4.7/5) reflect a smooth transition for staff, even those unfamiliar with PMS.
e4jconnect scores a perfect 5/5 for usability, with users highlighting its “user-friendly interface” and “seamless integration.” However, the limited review count (2 reviews) suggests less real-world testing.
Given the current review landscape, Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 11 shared features and 8 unique functions, including a housekeeping module, group booking, automated night audit, and multi-currency support. These features cater specifically to hostel operations and small properties.
e4jconnect provides 17 exclusive features such as guest communication via SMS, automated reminders, online check-in, shift planning, integrated payment terminals, and GDPR compliance—more than double Counter’s unique features. Its extensive automation and customization options make it more suitable for properties demanding detailed control.
For comprehensive functionality, especially automation and integrations, Edge: e4jconnect.
Counter’s support ratings are high at 4.96/5, with many reviews praising “fast,” “helpful,” and “responsive” service, particularly from staff like Evelyn and Max. Recent feedback indicates ongoing improvements, although some users mention slower support in certain zones.
e4jconnect also boasts a perfect 5/5 support rating, with users describing its “unbeatable” service and “excellent” responsiveness. However, with only 2 reviews, its support reputation is less proven in diverse situations.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Stripe, offering broad connectivity for OTAs and payment providers. Its integrations support platforms across Europe, North America, Asia Pacific, Africa, and more.
e4jconnect’s integration count is limited to just 1 verified partner—its own platform—meaning fewer connectivity options. This restricts its ability to link with third-party tools and channels compared to Counter.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews yield an impressive 4.73/5 rating, with hotel segments like hostels (83%) rating it particularly highly—average 4.75/5. Conversely, e4jconnect’s only 2 reviews do not provide enough data to gauge hotelier satisfaction, and it lacks recent feedback altogether.
The high volume and recency of Counter’s reviews make it the more reliable gauge of user satisfaction.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly available, which suggests it may be a free platform or custom-priced, especially geared toward hostel operators. Its value proposition emphasizes affordability and flexibility.
e4jconnect charges a flat $100/month fee, with no free tier or trial, positioning itself as a mid-range option for hotels seeking extensive features.
If budget is a primary concern, Counter’s unclear but potentially lower-cost model gives it an advantage. For those willing to pay for more automation and customization, e4jconnect is straightforward.
Not ideal if you require advanced automation, detailed analytics, or extensive third-party integrations.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, straightforward PMS or have limited budget for platform fees.
Counter’s core strength lies in its simplicity and tailored support for hostels and small hotels. Its high review count, recent positive feedback, and broad integrations make it a dependable choice for properties prioritizing ease and quick deployment.
e4jconnect offers a broader feature set, particularly for properties that need detailed automation, website integration, and advanced management tools. Its limited review data makes it less proven but potentially more powerful for tech-savvy teams.
If your priority is reliable, user-friendly property management with proven support and integrations, Counter is the recommended choice. For properties seeking in-depth control and automation, and comfortable with a higher price point, e4jconnect warrants consideration.
In conclusion, based on current reviews and feature breadth, Counter’s stronger recent performance and user satisfaction make it the better option for most small to mid-sized properties.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Counter and E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System share 11 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Group functionality | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in |
Showing top differences. 13 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and e4jconnect has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor