The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Flatswire shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Flatswire users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Flatswire |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Flatswire |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Flatswire |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Flatswire |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Flatswire by Flatswire hinges on your property's specific needs and operational priorities. While both aim to streamline property management, Counter’s focus on hostels and its established reputation contrast sharply with Flatswire’s broader property management scope. Your decision ultimately depends on whether you require a dedicated hostel PMS or a more generalized property platform.
Counter offers a well-rounded, feature-rich PMS tailored for hostels, with over 54 reviews and a high recent review count, making it a more validated choice. Flatswire, lacking recent reviews and a clear user base, remains less proven for your hotel’s needs. So, which system better aligns with your operational goals?
Counter is a feature-packed PMS designed specifically for hostels, with 19 distinct functionalities including channel management, booking engine, and automated night audits, all integrated into a single platform. Flatswire, in contrast, emphasizes tenant and maintenance management, with no verified features tailored to hotel operations, and zero recent reviews.
Counter’s 54 reviews in the past six months, with a 4.73/5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend, reflect strong user confidence and recent positive experiences. Flatswire’s lack of recent reviews and undefined user feedback make it difficult to assess its current performance or suitability for hotel management.
Are you prioritizing a highly rated, actively supported system with proven hotel-centric features? Counter’s recent reviews and high support scores suggest it’s the more reliable choice.
If your hotel primarily needs a user-friendly PMS focused on hostels with robust channel management, automatic payments, and integrated reporting, go with Counter. Its 16.5+ HTR Score and comprehensive feature set make it ideal for small to medium hostels looking for ease of use and reliable support.
If your property management involves tenant relations, maintenance, rent collection, and lease tracking across multiple property types, and you prefer a solution with a broader scope, Flatswire might appeal — but its absence of recent reviews and verified features suggests it’s less proven. For hotels, Counter’s established track record and hotel-specific features are a safer investment.
In essence, for hotels seeking a proven, highly-rated PMS with dedicated support, Counter is the clear winner. Flatswire’s broad property management focus is less relevant for your hotel operations and remains unvalidated through recent user feedback.
Counter scores an impressive 4.6/5 for ease of use, backed by its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and high user ratings. Users frequently mention how easy it is to train staff and manage operations remotely, praising its straightforward calendar views and simple navigation.
Flatswire’s usability is unverified since it has no recent reviews, support ratings, or user feedback to assess. Without concrete usability data, the most recent and relevant evidence favors Counter.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 features specific to hostel management, including channel management, booking engine, automated night audits, POS integration, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking. Flatswire, on the other hand, provides no verified features or functionality suited for hotel operations.
The depth and breadth of Counter’s features—particularly its automation, reporting, and multi-platform integrations—are unmatched in its category. Flatswire’s lack of verified features and no recent updates mean it cannot compete.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support team is rated at 4.96/5, with many reviews highlighting their responsiveness, especially from team members like Evelyn and Max. Hoteliers praise their quick replies and willingness to adapt, though some note support can be slower in certain time zones.
Flatswire’s customer support scores are unavailable, and without recent reviews, you cannot reliably gauge its support quality. Given Counter’s proven support record, it remains the safer choice.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment processors like Stripe, and industry platforms such as Cloudbeds and Goki. Flatswire has no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options.
Counter’s extensive integration network ensures your property can connect with key online distribution channels and revenue tools, enhancing operational efficiency. Flatswire’s lack of verified integrations diminishes its appeal for hotel use.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s current reviews, totaling 54 with an overall rating of 4.73/5, show strong satisfaction across diverse hotel segments, notably hostels. Its recent reviews continue to reinforce high confidence levels, with a 91% recommendation rate.
Flatswire has no recent reviews or rating data, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. The proven, recent positive feedback firmly favors Counter.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly disclose pricing; it operates on a custom quote basis, often reflecting its feature-rich, enterprise-grade platform. Flatswire’s pricing details are similarly unavailable, with no trial or transparent fee structure.
Given the lack of public pricing, your best approach is to contact vendors directly for tailored quotes. However, Counter’s value is demonstrated through extensive features and support, making it a worthwhile investment for hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive tenant or lease management, which is outside Counter’s scope. Hotels with complex multi-property portfolios might need more advanced solutions.
Not ideal if you require a dedicated PMS with hotel-specific features, integration with OTA channels, or recent user validation. Flatswire is better suited for property managers with diverse property types beyond hotels.
Counter primarily serves hostels and small hotels with a proven, feature-rich platform designed for hospitality. Its recent reviews and high ratings demonstrate its reliability, ease of use, and support quality, making it a strong choice for your hotel.
Flatswire, while offering broad property management tools, shows no recent user feedback or verified hotel features, making it a less confident choice. For your hotel, Counter’s dedicated focus, extensive integrations, and proven support make it the clear winner.
If you want a PMS with a track record of recent success, go with Counter. If your focus is tenant management across various property types and you are prepared to risk unvalidated reviews, Flatswire might be worth exploring—but only with cautious expectations.
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Flatswire share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Flatswire |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Flatswire share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Flatswire offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Flatswire: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Flatswire has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor