The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Xi Ruan Westsoft shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Xi Ruan Westsoft users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Both Counter by Counter and FoxHis by Xi Ruan Westsoft aim to streamline hotel management, but their approaches and market presence differ notably. Counter is a dedicated PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, with a broader feature set and more recent user feedback. FoxHis, however, is focused on providing AI-driven insights with limited publicly available user data. Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize proven usability and extensive features or advanced analytics.
Counter boasts an impressive review count and recent feedback, making it a more reliable indicator of performance. FoxHis, with no recent reviews or public ratings, remains a less tested option. So, which platform better fits your hotel’s specific needs?
Counter offers a comprehensive property management system designed for small-scale accommodations like hostels, inns, and boutique hotels. It covers essential areas such as channel management, payment processing, booking engine, and housekeeping, all built into an intuitive interface. FoxHis, in contrast, emphasizes AI-driven insights that aggregate guest feedback and provide actionable recommendations, but it lacks detailed info on core features or real-world usability.
Counter’s real-world reviews highlight its ease of use, broad feature set, and active support, whereas FoxHis has no recent user feedback to assess its effectiveness. Both products seek to enhance operational efficiency, but Counter’s tangible, proven tools make it the safer bet for day-to-day hotel management. Are AI insights enough if your hotel needs a full PMS?
If your hotel needs a proven, user-friendly PMS with essential operational features, go with Counter. Its large review base—54 recent reviews in the last six months—confirms consistent performance and satisfaction, especially among hostels (83% of users). FoxHis might appeal if you’re seeking AI-driven guest feedback analysis and operational recommendations, but with no recent reviews or ratings, its reliability remains unverified.
For small hotels or hostels prioritizing straightforward management, Counter’s comprehensive suite supports daily operations, reporting, and integrations with partners like Stripe and SiteMinder. Conversely, if your team wants to leverage advanced analytics to improve guest satisfaction and operational insights, FoxHis could be worth exploring, albeit without proven track records. Which approach aligns better with your current hotel management needs?
Counter’s interface scores a solid 4.6/5 for ease of use and a 4.7/5 for onboarding, with many users praising its simplicity and quick staff adoption. Reviews highlight that users find the system intuitive, with fast, helpful support from Evelyn and Max, making staff training straightforward. FoxHis, lacking available reviews or user ratings, makes it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience.
Counter’s mobile-friendly design and clear workflows facilitate remote management, a key advantage for busy hoteliers. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, calendar view, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and automated night audit—features critical for small hotel operations. FoxHis, with no detailed feature list or verified integrations, appears to focus on guest feedback analysis and AI summaries, which are valuable but less comprehensive for day-to-day hotel management.
Counter’s multi-functional suite addresses core operational needs, while FoxHis’s strength is in aggregated guest insights. Given the number of features and proven capabilities, Counter’s feature set is substantially more complete and applicable. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially from dedicated team members such as Evelyn and Max. Users describe support as “super efficient” and appreciate the quick resolution of issues, although some mention support can be slower in certain time zones.
With no available reviews or ratings for FoxHis, it’s impossible to gauge support quality. Support quality is critical for smooth daily operations, and Counter’s established reputation clearly favors it. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including key platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations facilitate online payments, channel management, and access control, streamlining operations across multiple platforms. FoxHis currently has no verified integrations publicly listed, limiting its connectivity options.
For hotels relying on third-party integrations to expand distribution and payment options, Counter’s partner network is a significant advantage. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s overall rating of 4.73/5, based on 54 recent reviews, indicates high user satisfaction, especially among hostel operators (average rating 4.75/5 across 52 reviews). Review sentiment emphasizes ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support.
FoxHis, lacking recent reviews, offers no data on user satisfaction or hotel ratings. Given the proven positive feedback for Counter, it is clearly the favored choice among hoteliers seeking reliable, well-rated software. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly list specific pricing but is described as a paid PMS with no free tier or trials. Its value is reflected in the high satisfaction scores and extensive feature set.
FoxHis’s pricing details are also unavailable, but as a platform focusing on AI insights rather than full PMS functionality, it may operate on a different, possibly subscription-based model. However, without transparent pricing or trial options, evaluating value is difficult. For a full PMS, Counter’s pricing structure aligns with its offering.
Not ideal if you require highly advanced revenue management, extensive multi-property capabilities, or complex group booking features.
Not ideal if you need a full PMS, channel management, or robust operational features without verified support or recent user feedback.
Counter provides a proven, comprehensive PMS with a strong track record, especially among hostels and small hotels. Its large, recent review base confirms its ease of use, support quality, and feature completeness, making it a safe choice for daily management.
FoxHis, while promising in AI-driven insights, currently lacks recent user reviews and detailed feature validation. It might appeal to hotels seeking to augment existing systems with guest sentiment analysis, but it’s untested in real-world hotel operations.
If your hotel needs a dependable, feature-rich PMS, Counter is the clear choice. If you’re exploring AI-driven guest insights and can accept a less proven platform, FoxHis could be considered, but with caution.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and FoxHis share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and FoxHis share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while FoxHis offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. FoxHis: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Xi Ruan Westsoft has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor