The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
InovGuest shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while InovGuest users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
InovGuest |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
InovGuest |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
InovGuest |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
InovGuest |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and InovGuest by InovGuest hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both products aim to streamline property management, but Counter’s focus is on ease of use for hostels, while InovGuest claims to offer broad operational automation. Given Counter’s strong recent reviews and extensive feature set, your decision should consider which product aligns best with your operational priorities.
Counter is a well-established PMS for hostels with a proven track record, boasting a high rating and large review base, making it a trusted choice. InovGuest, despite its promises, currently lacks recent reviews and user feedback, raising questions about its real-world effectiveness. So, which solution truly serves your property’s needs?
Counter’s key strength is its dedicated focus on hostels and small properties, offering a free, easy-to-use platform that simplifies daily operations. InovGuest claims to serve hotels broadly but has no recent reviews or measurable ratings, making it difficult to gauge its performance and user satisfaction. Counter’s 54 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.73/5 overall rating, reflect ongoing user satisfaction, while InovGuest remains an unreviewed entity.
Counter’s features include channel management, payment processing, booking engine, and housekeeping modules—many of which are absent or unconfirmed in InovGuest. Conversely, InovGuest’s lack of verified integrations and user feedback casts doubt on its current market presence. Which platform will reliably improve your hotel’s operational flow?
If your hotel is a hostel or small property seeking an intuitive, mobile-friendly PMS with strong onboarding and customer support, Counter is the clear choice. Its recent reviews underscore its simplicity, responsiveness, and extensive feature set, especially for hostels, with a 91% likelihood to recommend.
InovGuest might appeal if you’re a mid-sized or larger hotel looking for automation and integration, but the absence of recent reviews and verified integrations makes it a risky option right now. If you value proven support, detailed operational tools, and a product with a 4.73/5 rating from over 50 reviews, Counter is the safer, more reliable choice.
Counter’s interface is consistently praised for its clarity, with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating and positive reviews highlighting its intuitive design. Users report that onboarding is smooth, staff adopt the system quickly, and remote management via mobile is seamless.
InovGuest, however, has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability. With Counter’s proven track record and high user satisfaction, it clearly leads in ease of adoption. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, calendar view, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking—features that InovGuest does not currently list or verify. Its integrated modules support daily operations, revenue management, and guest communication in a comprehensive way.
InovGuest’s feature set remains unverified, with no listed functionalities or integrations. Given Counter’s detailed feature catalog and proven capabilities, it provides a more complete and reliable toolset for hotels. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and proactive assistance. Reviewers frequently mention staff like Evelyn and Max, emphasizing their professionalism and quick resolution of issues.
InovGuest’s support ratings are unavailable, and without recent reviews, it’s impossible to assess support quality. Given Counter’s stellar reputation and recent review volume, it clearly stands out. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki, providing a broad ecosystem of tools to extend functionality. InovGuest has no listed or verified integrations, limiting its immediate connectivity options.
With Counter’s established integrations, your hotel gains flexibility in managing online bookings, payments, and access control. The lack of verified partners for InovGuest suggests it is not yet ready for multi-platform environments. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews, with an overall rating of 4.73/5, reflect strong satisfaction across diverse hotel types, especially hostels. Reviewers highlight ease of use, customer support, and operational automation as key strengths.
InovGuest’s absence of recent reviews makes it impossible to gauge user sentiment or satisfaction. Until verified feedback emerges, Counter remains the preferred choice for hotelier-rated performance. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly listed, but no implementation fees or monthly charges are mentioned, suggesting potential flexibility or free access for certain features. InovGuest’s pricing is also unavailable, implying it might be a custom quote or still in development.
Without clear pricing data, your best bet is that Counter’s established presence and transparent feature offerings provide better value, especially considering its proven support and feature set. Edge: Counter.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter is a proven, highly-rated PMS with a broad feature set, dedicated focus on hostels, and a large review base demonstrating ongoing user satisfaction. InovGuest, despite its promising claims, currently lacks recent reviews, verified integrations, and measurable ratings, making it a less reliable option at this moment.
Choose Counter if you want a system that is easy to adopt, well-supported, and equipped with essential operational features. Its extensive integrations and positive recent reviews make it the safer, more effective choice for most hoteliers.
Opt for InovGuest only if your property can wait for further validation, and you’re interested in future automation and integration capabilities that are yet to be proven in the market. For now, Counter’s track record makes it the clear winner.
According to HTR's product database, Counter and InovGuest share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
InovGuest |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and InovGuest share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while InovGuest offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. InovGuest: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and InovGuest has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor