The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Mobile App.
Jaras shines , with exclusive features like On premise and Guest Messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Jaras users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Jaras by Jaras hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Counter, with its proven track record, has a strong foothold in the hostel market, offering a user-friendly PMS with integrated channel management and automation features. Jaras, on the other hand, is a newer platform that promises a centralized, all-in-one cloud-native system suited for larger, multi-property operators seeking extensive automation and distribution.
Both products aim to streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature depth, and market presence. As a hoteliers, your decision should reflect your current operational complexity, budget, and growth plans. Are you looking for a stable, proven system or a modern platform with broad automation capabilities?
Counter boasts a rating of 4.73 out of 5 based on 54 recent reviews, with a high customer support score of 4.96. It’s especially favored by hostels and small hotels for its ease of use, robust integration options, and automation features, making it a reliable choice for properties prioritizing simplicity and support.
Jaras’s review count is zero, which indicates limited market presence and user feedback. Its pricing is higher at $1,000 per month, and it lacks verified integrations, making it less accessible for small or emerging hotels. Given current data and recent reviews, Counter is the stronger choice for most hoteliers today, especially those in the hostel segment.
Counter is designed specifically for hostel operations, emphasizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and mobile management, which resonates with small to mid-sized hostels. Its intuitive interface, rated 4.6/5, and dedicated features like Guest CRM, automated night audits, and multi-currency support make daily management smoother.
Jaras, however, targets larger properties or portfolios with its comprehensive automation, real-time status updates, and extensive distribution across over 150 channels. Its focus on financial workflows and operational automation suits scale but lacks the proven user experience and recent reviews Counter benefits from.
With Counter’s more recent and plentiful user feedback, it’s clear that it is better suited for small to medium hotels and hostels. Jaras’s lack of reviews and limited global presence also reduce its reliability for most hoteliers today.
Edge: Counter
Counter offers a suite of 10 features exclusive to its platform, including payment processing, booking engine, group functionality, automated night audits, a mobile app, guest CRM, and multi-currency support. It’s well-suited for hostels needing versatile tools to streamline operations and revenue.
Jaras provides 7 unique features, emphasizing real-time status updates, digital registration, guest messaging, revenue management, and automation of housekeeping and maintenance. It’s built for large-scale properties that require extensive automation and distribution.
Counter’s feature set is more comprehensive for small to mid-sized properties, especially with automation and POS integration highlighted in reviews. Jaras’s automation and distribution features are promising but lack the same proven depth and recent user validation.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s support team scores a near-perfect 4.96/5, with reviewers praising their responsiveness and professionalism. Hoteliers appreciate quick, helpful responses — especially from team members like Evelyn and Max — and see support as a key strength.
Jaras currently has no publicly available reviews on customer support, which makes assessing its service levels difficult. Without verified user feedback, Counter’s support edge is clear.
Edge: Counter
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including well-known systems like Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, Stripe, and Goki. These integrations facilitate smooth operations and revenue management across multiple platforms.
Jaras has no verified integrations, which limits its connectivity options for now. For hotels relying on existing channel managers and payment systems, Counter’s extensive integrations are a decisive advantage.
Edge: Counter
Counter enjoys a 4.73/5 overall rating from 54 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and automation features. Its core user base—mainly hostels—rates it highly for simplicity and reliability.
Jaras has no reviews, leaving its user satisfaction unverified. Without recent or substantial feedback, Counter’s higher rating indicates broader market acceptance and proven performance.
Edge: Counter
Counter does not publicly list a price, suggesting a flexible, possibly tiered or quote-based model suited to small and large properties. Its free PMS model, combined with integrated paid features like channel management, makes it attractive for budget-conscious hostels.
Jaras’s flat fee is $1,000/month, which may be prohibitive for small properties but offers an all-in-one solution for larger operators. The lack of transparent pricing for Counter makes direct comparison difficult, but its flexible model and proven value suggest better affordability for most.
Counter’s simplicity, automation, and support make it ideal for small, budget-conscious hostels and boutique properties. It’s less suited for large chains needing extensive revenue analytics or multi-property management.
Bullets:
Jaras’s comprehensive automation and distribution features suit scalable, multi-property operations aiming for digital transformation. Its higher price point and newer market presence are less attractive for small or budget-sensitive hotels.
Bullets:
Counter is a mature, well-reviewed PMS built for small to medium properties, especially hostels. Its ease of use, extensive integrations, and responsive support make it a reliable choice for hoteliers seeking quick deployment and operational simplicity.
Jaras promises a unified, cloud-native platform capable of automating extensive operations for larger properties. However, its lack of recent reviews, limited integrations, and higher price point make it a less proven choice today.
For most hotels and hostels, Counter offers a more tested, support-rich solution that aligns with current operational needs. Jaras may appeal to larger, tech-forward portfolios willing to invest in a future-proof but less validated platform.
Edge: Counter
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Jaras share 9 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated night audit | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Group functionality | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| On premise | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 5 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Jaras share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Jaras offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Jaras: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Jaras has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor