The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support .
Octorate shines , with exclusive features like Performance Reporting and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Octorate users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | #78 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | #72 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | #41 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | #66 0 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | #71 0 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | #44 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | #51 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Octorate hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational scale. Both aim to streamline property management, but Counter is aimed squarely at hostels with a focus on ease and affordability, whereas Octorate offers a broader suite of features suited for various property types. Which platform aligns better with your current priorities and future growth plans?
Counter excels at providing a free, straightforward PMS tailored for hostels, while Octorate’s extensive feature set and integrations cater to hotels seeking an all-in-one cloud management solution. Are you prioritizing simplicity and cost-effectiveness or comprehensive control and scalability?
Counter, with its 54 reviews and recent feedback, clearly dominates in overall ratings, boasting a 4.73/5 score and a 91% likelihood to recommend, reflecting high user satisfaction. In contrast, Octorate has no reviews or ratings available, making it difficult to gauge its real-world performance.
Counter is praised for its ease of use, quick onboarding, and customer support, specifically tailored for hostels, which make it a compelling choice if your property operates in this segment. Octorate, meanwhile, markets itself as an all-encompassing PMS with a wide array of features, but without recent reviews, its real-world reliability remains unverified.
Are you comfortable choosing a product with proven user feedback, or are you willing to risk less information for potentially broader features?
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel, especially one that values affordability and quick setup, Counter is the better choice. Its dedicated focus on hostels and simplicity make it ideal for small teams seeking an easy-to-manage system.
If you’re running a hotel or property portfolio that requires extensive features like advanced reporting, multi-property management, dynamic pricing, and integrations with OTAs, Octorate's platform is more suitable. It’s designed for scalable operations and larger properties needing integrated guest communication, invoicing, and automation tools.
For small hostels looking for a straightforward, cost-effective solution, go with Counter. For larger hotels or multi-property managers needing a comprehensive, customizable system, Octorate fits better.
Counter scores a high 4.6/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface, and quick staff onboarding. Users appreciate its straightforward calendar and reservation management that minimize training time. Support from Counter’s team is frequently praised for responsiveness, especially for new users.
Octorate, however, does not list any usability ratings or recent reviews, leaving its user experience unconfirmed. Its extensive feature set suggests a steeper learning curve and more complex onboarding processes, which could require dedicated training and support.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 shared features primarily focused on hostel management, such as POS integration, online reservations, and automation. It lacks advanced features like multi-property management, analytics dashboards, or rate intelligence.
Octorate provides 50 unique features, including an open API, advanced analytics, metasearch connectivity, multi-property management, rate comparison tools, guest messaging via WhatsApp, and more. These capabilities support larger, multi-property operations seeking detailed reporting and automation.
If you need a simple PMS with essential functions, Counter’s features suffice. For comprehensive control, automation, and analytics, Octorate’s extensive feature set is the clear edge.
Edge: Octorate.
Counter’s support is rated at 4.96/5, with reviews emphasizing its quick, helpful responses and dedicated support team, including mentions of Evelyn and Max. Users often highlight the responsiveness as critical during system issues or onboarding.
Octorate lacks recent review data or support ratings, leaving its customer support reputation unverified. Given the complexity of its platform, users would expect more extensive onboarding and support, but this cannot be confirmed.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder, focusing on essential payment and channel management integrations. Its partner list is narrower but covers common hospitality needs.
Octorate boasts 28 verified integrations, including major OTAs (Booking.com, Airbnb, Expedia), rate management tools (PriceLabs, Beyond), and other property tech solutions. Its open API and broader connectivity support larger, multi-channel operations.
If your property needs a straightforward setup with key integrations, Counter is sufficient. For extensive connectivity and multi-platform management, Octorate’s integrations give it a significant advantage.
Edge: Octorate.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews with a 4.73/5 score and a 91% recommendation rate indicate high user satisfaction, especially from hostel operators. Hotel segments such as hostels and independent properties rate Counter particularly well, with some reviews citing ease and support as standout features.
Octorate has no recent reviews or ratings, so hotelier feedback is unavailable. Without user experiences, it’s impossible to determine how the platform performs in real-world settings.
Based on available data, Counter is the clearly preferred choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s pricing isn’t explicitly listed, but its free plan and focus on small hostels suggest affordability. Octorate charges a base price of $1,100 per month, with a 30-day trial available, positioning it as a premium solution.
Counter’s free or low-cost approach makes it particularly attractive for small, budget-conscious hostels. Conversely, Octorate’s higher pricing reflects its broader feature set, suited for larger operations with more complex needs.
If budget is a primary concern, Counter offers a compelling entry point. For larger properties seeking extensive automation and integrations, the investment in Octorate may be justified.
Counter suits small to medium hostels seeking simplicity and reliability without significant upfront costs.
Octorate is best suited for established properties or growing hotel groups seeking a comprehensive, all-in-one platform.
Counter offers a streamlined, no-cost PMS designed primarily for hostels and budget accommodations. Its ease of use, strong support, and recent positive reviews make it an attractive choice for small properties and startups looking to keep things simple.
Octorate provides a detailed, feature-rich platform capable of managing complex operations across multiple properties. Its extensive integrations, automation, and reporting tools appeal to larger hotels and property managers aiming for full operational control.
If your hotel prioritizes cost, simplicity, and quick onboarding, Counter is the clear winner. If your focus is on scalability, automation, and detailed analytics, Octorate's comprehensive solution is the better fit.
In summary: For small hostels and properties seeking a proven, easy-to-use PMS, Counter is the optimal choice. For larger, multi-property operations with advanced needs, Octorate offers a broader set of functionalities that can support your growth.
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Octorate (Property Management System) share 19 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Custom dashboards | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| Multi-property Management | ||
| Open API | ||
| Vacation Rental Rate Intelligence |
Showing top differences. 38 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Octorate (Property Management System) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Octorate (Property Management System) offers 28. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Octorate (Property Management System): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Octorate has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor