The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Passepartout shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Passepartout users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations and guest satisfaction. Counter by Counter is a PMS specifically designed for hostels, boasting a highly positive review profile, whereas Passepartout by Passepartout appears to lack recent review activity and user feedback. Both solutions aim to streamline property management, but the diverging levels of user confidence and feature sets make your decision clearer. Which system aligns better with your operational needs and growth plans?
While Counter has established a strong presence with over 50 recent reviews, Passepartout's limited feedback makes evaluation difficult. If recent, detailed reviews are essential for your decision, Counter offers a more reliable choice. Are you willing to settle for less proven software, or do you prioritize a solution with proven user satisfaction?
Counter stands out for its focus on hostels and small properties, offering a suite of features tailored to these needs. Its interface is praised for being intuitive, with a user rating of 4.6/5 and a support rating of 4.96/5, reflecting high usability and customer satisfaction. Passepartout, lacking recent reviews, offers no current data on usability or support, making it difficult to assess its suitability.
Counter's feature set includes a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audits, and a guest CRM, all integrated into its platform. Passepartout's broader description suggests it’s a comprehensive system but lacks explicit feature details or recent user feedback. Which platform provides the practical tools your hotel needs right now?
Counter’s long-standing market presence across multiple regions and its high review scores suggest a mature, stable product. Passepartout’s absence from recent reviews raises questions about ongoing support, feature updates, and regional availability. Do you prefer a proven system with established support and features, or are you open to trying newer, less documented options?
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or small boutique property, Counter is the clear choice. Its 54 recent reviews and 4.73/5 overall rating demonstrate strong user satisfaction, particularly among hostels, with 83% of users in this segment rating it highly. Passepartout’s lack of recent reviews means it offers no current validation for suitability or performance.
Counter is ideal if you value ease of use, quick onboarding, and a robust feature set that includes channel management, integrated payments, and automation. Passepartout might appeal if you manage a larger portfolio or seek AI-powered tenant insights, but the absence of recent feedback makes this uncertain.
For properties that prioritize reliable support and a proven track record, Counter offers peace of mind. Conversely, if you're exploring innovative features or tailored property management, Passepartout's lack of recent validation makes it a risky choice.
Counter’s 4.6/5 ease of use rating underscores its user-friendly interface, which is consistently praised for being simple, intuitive, and quick to learn. Users also highlight a smooth onboarding experience, with a 4.7/5 onboarding rating, and positive comments about staff responsiveness.
Passepartout offers no recent review data, so its usability and onboarding quality remain unverified. Without user feedback, you cannot confidently assess how easily your team could adopt it or how supportive its onboarding process might be.
Edge: Counter. Its current high ratings and positive reviews suggest that your staff will adapt quickly and efficiently to its platform.
Counter provides 19 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, housekeeping module, group functionality, automated night audit, and guest CRM, among others. These features are designed specifically for small properties, especially hostels, and are actively integrated into its platform.
Passepartout, on the other hand, offers no detailed list of features or unique capabilities, making it impossible to compare directly. The absence of verified features suggests it lacks Counter’s breadth of operational tools, or at least that this information is not publicly available or recent.
Edge: Counter. Its comprehensive feature set is clearly documented and tailored to streamline hostel operations.
Counter’s support team has a stellar reputation, with a 4.96/5 customer support rating and reviews praising their quick, professional, and helpful responses. Review quotes highlight staff like Evelyn and Max for their responsiveness and understanding.
Passepartout offers no recent review data or detailed support information, leaving its support quality uncertain. Without feedback, you cannot verify if its support meets the high standards set by Counter.
Edge: Counter. Its recent, high support ratings and positive user testimonials make it the safer choice for reliable assistance.
Counter boasts integrations with seven verified partners, including Channel Managers (WuBook, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds), payment providers (Stripe), and other tools like Goki and FLYR. These integrations help streamline operations and expand your distribution channels.
Passepartout has no verified integrations listed and no recent partnerships noted, raising concerns about its ability to connect with other tools in your tech stack.
Edge: Counter. Its verified, diverse integrations make it more adaptable and capable of supporting your existing systems.
Counter’s recent reviews (54 in the last 6 months) yield an overall rating of 4.73/5, with 91% of users likely to recommend it. Hoteliers in the hostel segment rate it highly at 4.75/5, praising its usability, support, and automation.
Passepartout’s lack of recent reviews means there is no current user rating or recommendation data. This absence diminishes confidence in its current performance and satisfaction levels.
Edge: Counter. Its recent, high ratings and strong recommendation scores make it the preferred choice among users.
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, but it does not offer a freemium or trial version. Its value proposition appears tied to its extensive feature set and support, suggesting a potentially higher price point.
Passepartout reports no available pricing information, implying it might be custom-quoted or less transparent. The lack of pricing transparency makes comparison difficult.
In summary, both platforms do not openly advertise their costs, but Counter’s established presence suggests a consistent pricing model aligned with features and support.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced revenue management or complex multi-property operations, as Counter’s focus is more on operational simplicity.
Not ideal if your hotel needs proven, recent support, or integration with multiple third-party platforms, given the current lack of recent reviews and detailed feature validation.
Counter emerges as the more reliable choice due to its extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and proven feature set. Its focus on hostels and small properties makes it well-suited for hotels in this segment seeking an all-in-one management platform.
Choose Counter if you prioritize ease of use, support, and proven performance. It offers the operational tools, integrations, and user confidence needed to run your property smoothly.
Passepartout might appeal to larger portfolios or those seeking AI-driven insights, but the current lack of recent feedback and verified features makes it a risky gamble without more validation. Its value remains uncertain until further user data becomes available.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers, especially those in the hostel or small hotel segment, Counter by Counter is the safer, more dependable choice that can support your day-to-day operations and future growth.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Passepartout |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Passepartout share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Passepartout share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Passepartout offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Passepartout: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Passepartout has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor