The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
char desarrollo de sistemas slu shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while char desarrollo de sistemas slu users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and PMS Link by char desarrollo de sistemas slu hinges on your property's specific needs. Both aim to streamline property management but differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence.
Counter is a specialized PMS tailored for hostels, boasting a high user rating and a strong presence in multiple regions. PMS Link, meanwhile, offers a broader suite of management tools suited for various property types but has limited user feedback and regional reach. Which system aligns best with your operational priorities?
Counter excels at simplifying hostel operations with an intuitive interface, robust automation, and dedicated features like a channel manager, POS integration, and group booking tools. PMS Link provides a comprehensive set of management functions, including reservations, guest communication, and operational monitoring, but it lacks detailed user reviews and proven regional support.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews and a high NPS score of 9.02/10 suggest a satisfied user base, especially among hostel operators. PMS Link, with no recent reviews or user ratings, offers potential but lacks current user validation. Are you prioritizing proven user satisfaction or exploring broader management capabilities?
If your hotel primarily operates hostels or budget accommodations and needs a straightforward, easy-to-use platform, Counter is the clear choice. Its high ease-of-use rating (4.6/5) and focus on hostel-specific features make onboarding and daily management easier.
However, if you manage a diverse portfolio requiring advanced operational tools like detailed reports, guest communication, and extensive customization, PMS Link could appeal—provided it gains more user validation. For now, Counter’s proven track record makes it the safer, more reliable choice. Which features matter most to your operations?
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, driven by a clean, mobile-friendly interface that simplifies check-ins, bookings, and reporting. Its onboarding process is rated 4.7/5, with many users highlighting how quickly staff adapt to its straightforward design.
PMS Link’s user experience lacks published ratings or detailed reviews, making it difficult to assess its usability. Without recent user feedback, it’s uncertain how intuitive or accessible its interface truly is. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, CRM, and multi-currency support—features tailored for hostels and small hotels. PMS Link’s feature set isn’t detailed or compared directly, and it has no verified integrations or unique functionalities listed.
Counter’s dedicated features for revenue tracking, group management, and mobile operations set it apart. With more features proven in the field, Counter clearly leads in feature depth. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support team boasts a 4.96/5 rating, with reviewers praising their responsiveness, especially staff like Evelyn and Max. Hoteliers describe support as quick, helpful, and proactive, even during system bugs.
There is no available recent support data or reviews for PMS Link, making it impossible to assess support quality. Until more feedback emerges, Counter’s well-documented support leads the comparison. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major channel managers (SiteMinder, Cloudbeds), payment providers (Stripe), and access management (Goki). PMS Link offers no verified integrations or partner data, limiting its connectivity options.
Counter’s established ecosystem enables smoother operations across platforms, reducing manual work. Its integrations are a key advantage for hotels seeking a connected management system. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 54 reviews in the past six months, with an overall rating of 4.73/5, show consistent recent satisfaction—especially among hostel operators, who rate it at 4.75/5. The high likelihood to recommend (91%) underscores its positive reception.
PMS Link lacks recent reviews or ratings, meaning we cannot gauge user sentiment or satisfaction levels. Given Counter’s recent, high-volume feedback, it clearly holds stronger user approval. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly list pricing but is known to operate on a subscription model without implementation fees or freemium options. PMS Link’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may be tailored or not publicly disclosed.
Counter’s transparent approach and absence of hidden fees make it easier to budget. Without concrete pricing data for PMS Link, Counter’s value proposition appears more accessible. Edge: Counter.
Not ideal if you need highly customizable workflows or advanced revenue management. Larger hotels with complex operations may find Counter’s feature set insufficient.
Not ideal if you prefer a ready-to-use, hostel-focused PMS or need proven recent user feedback. Small hostels or properties aiming for simplicity might find PMS Link overly complex or untested.
Counter stands out as a well-rated, actively used PMS designed specifically for hostels and small hotels. Its high recent review count and positive feedback make it a reliable choice for properties that want ease of use and proven features.
PMS Link offers extensive management functions but lacks recent validation and publicly available reviews, making its suitability uncertain. For now, Counter’s strong user feedback and regional presence make it the safer, more trusted option.
If you need a straightforward, reliable PMS with a proven track record among hostel operators, Counter is the clear winner. Its focus on automation, integrations, and support addresses core operational needs efficiently.
However, if your property management needs extend beyond hostels into larger or more complex properties, and you can verify its capabilities further, PMS Link might be worth exploring. But with no recent reviews, risk remains.
In conclusion, for your hotel—especially if you prioritize usability, support, and proven performance—Counter offers a tangible advantage. Its large, recent review base and feature set make it the more dependable choice for today’s property management challenges.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and PMS Link share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and PMS Link share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while PMS Link offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. PMS Link: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and char desarrollo de sistemas slu has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor