The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 227 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in Value for Money — especially for hostel properties (4.7/5), with exclusive features like Multi-currency and Multi-lingual.
Preno shines in ease of use and staff adoption — especially for city-center properties (4.9/5), with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Native Email Marketing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 227 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 170 |
After analyzing 227 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Preno users highlight ease of use and staff adoption, housekeeping workflow management, billing and finance reporting. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
+
Ease of use and staff adoption
▾
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
+
Housekeeping workflow management
▾
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
+
Billing and finance reporting
▾
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
+
Integrations and API connectivity
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
−
Payment flexibility gaps
▾
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
−
Paperless check-in
▾
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
−
Seasonal training and onboarding support
▾
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #27 28 reviews | #14 87 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #48 4 reviews | #35 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #34 2 reviews | #48 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #28 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #33 16 reviews | #14 68 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #45 4 reviews | #14 54 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #44 4 reviews | #24 18 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | #9 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | #28 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | #29 14 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #17 4 reviews | #22 3 reviews |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | #17 2 reviews |
Counter by Counter and Preno by Preno both address property management, but they diverge sharply in target clientele and feature depth. Counter focuses on hostels, comprising 83% of its user base with a 4.7/5 rating from 50 hostel reviews. Preno, by contrast, serves independent boutique hotels, motels, B&Bs, and pubs, with strong adoption in boutique hotels (19%), motels (25%), and bed & breakfasts (9%), achieving 4.8/5 across 170 reviews.
Both systems solve the core problem of simplifying daily hotel operations—reservations, check-ins, payments, and channel management—through cloud-based interfaces that support remote access. Counter emphasizes ease and speed for hostels with a mobile-friendly design, while Preno integrates broader operational modules including revenue management and multi-property oversight.
If you operate a hostel primarily focused on bunk-style accommodations, Counter is the better choice based on 50 hostel reviews averaging 4.7/5 and a user base where hostels dominate 83%. Its interface and automation reduce manual workload for front desk teams managing complex shared rooms. However, if your property is a boutique hotel, motel, or B&B with fewer than 100 rooms, Preno’s 4.8/5 rating across 170 reviews, including 68 for boutique hotels and 55 for motels, makes it a superior fit. Preno’s integrated revenue management and channel manager suit properties needing dynamic pricing and multi-property visibility.
Data for luxury hotels, resorts, and branded hotels is too thin for Counter (fewer than 10 reviews each), while Preno has consistent ratings above 4.7/5 for these segments, supporting its suitability. Preno’s multi-property dashboard is also a key advantage for operators managing multiple sites, a feature missing in Counter.
Counter and Preno both receive high ease-of-use ratings: 4.6/5 for Counter and 4.8/5 for Preno, with onboarding both rated 4.7/5. Reviewers praise Counter’s intuitive interface that requires no teaching and is easy for any staff member to adopt quickly. Preno users highlight the clean layout and rapid training curve, even for new staff with limited tech skills.
Counter’s mobile browser interface supports operations on the go, which is crucial for hostel staff who often multitask remotely. Preno’s cloud access from any device, including phones and laptops, enables centralized control over multiple properties. Neither product shows significant ease-of-use weaknesses in reviews.
Edge: Even.
Preno offers 13 unique hotel-relevant features beyond the 17 shared with Counter, including integrated CRS, revenue management, native email marketing, EPoS, drag-n-drop tapechart, real-time status updates, GDPR and PCI compliance, and automated space optimization. These features enable boutique hotels and motels to optimize pricing, automate guest communication, and manage rooms dynamically, directly impacting revenue and operational workflows.
Counter’s unique features are limited to multi-currency and multi-lingual support, which benefit hostels serving international backpackers but lack the advanced revenue and booking tools Preno provides. Counter’s strength lies in simplified hostel workflow automation rather than complex revenue management or detailed reporting.
Edge: Preno.
Both products have strong customer support ratings with Counter at 4.9/5 and Preno at 4.8/5, and equal onboarding scores of 4.7/5. Counter reviewers frequently mention rapid, friendly, and knowledgeable support staff, specifically naming Evelyn, Max, and José as responsive. Preno users also commend its responsive support team and helpfulness through onboarding and issue resolution, though some note occasional delays during busy periods.
Given the close ratings and similar feedback about support quality and responsiveness, neither product has a clear advantage.
Edge: Even.
Preno has 17 verified integrations compared to Counter’s 7, a 143% difference exceeding the 25% threshold for edge calls. Both support key partners like SiteMinder and Goki. Counter integrates with payment processors like Stripe, channel managers like Cloudbeds and Channex, and hospitality platforms like WuBook and FLYR Hospitality.
Preno’s broader ecosystem includes Xero accounting, Bookboost marketing, RevControl revenue management, GuestTraction guest feedback, Zingle messaging, TrustYou reputation, STAAH channel manager, and Revinate CRM. This rich integration suite supports boutique hotels and motels requiring comprehensive financial, marketing, and guest engagement capabilities.
Edge: Preno.
Counter has an overall rating of 4.6/5 based on 57 reviews, primarily from hostels, with no reviews in the last six months. Preno holds a slightly higher overall rating of 4.8/5 from 170 reviews, including 3 recent reviews in the last six months. However, Preno’s review volume has dropped 87% recently (3 vs 23.3 average per 6 months over prior two years), suggesting its all-time ratings may not fully reflect current product quality or support.
Both products receive high segment ratings; Counter’s hostel rating is 4.7/5 (50 reviews), while Preno’s boutique hotel and motel ratings are 4.8/5 or above. Preno also scores consistently higher across luxury hotels, resorts, and branded hotels segments.
Edge: Even.
Counter does not publicly disclose pricing, offers no freemium or trial, and does not charge implementation fees or monthly flat or per-room fees. It is promoted as free and easy to use, with no published cost details.
Preno publishes a $500 base price with no freemium or monthly flat/room fees, no implementation fees, and offers a 30-day trial. This upfront pricing suits boutique and motel operators seeking transparency and a trial period before commitment.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter by Counter and Preno by Preno serve distinctly different hotel segments with some feature overlap but divergent depth and integrations. Counter excels for hostels with its free, mobile-friendly platform, multi-currency support, and streamlined workflows praised by 83% hostel users. Preno targets boutique hotels, motels, and B&Bs with richer features like revenue management, integrated CRS, and extensive third-party integrations supporting complex operations and multi-property management.
Choose Counter if you run a small to medium-sized hostel seeking a low-cost, easy-to-use PMS focused on bunk bed and shared accommodation management, emphasizing mobile access and responsive support. Two concrete advantages are its no-cost model and multi-lingual interface tailored to international backpackers.
Choose Preno if your property is a boutique hotel, motel, or B&B requiring integrated revenue management, multi-property dashboards, and native marketing tools. Advantages include its extensive verified integrations (17 vs 7), and advanced features like drag-and-drop tapecharts and GDPR compliance that improve operational control and revenue optimization.
Note that Preno’s review activity has dropped sharply in the last six months—3 reviews versus an average of 23.3 in prior periods—so its all-time stellar ratings (4.8/5) may not fully represent recent product or support experience. Counter’s review volume is smaller (57) but stable, though lacking recent feedback. This contrast in review recency and volume should weigh into your purchasing decision alongside your property type and feature priorities.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Accounting & Finance
|
|
|
| Direct billing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
|
▾
Marketing & Ecommerce
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration & Configuration
|
|
|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| On premise | ||
|
▾
Customer Management
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Front Office
|
|
|
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Groups Management
|
|
|
| Group functionality | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Guest Experience
|
|
|
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Housekeeping
|
|
|
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Payments
|
|
|
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Reservations Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Revenue Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes & Compliance
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Support & Training
|
|
|
| Online 24/7 support | ||
|
▾
Food & Beverage
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module |
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Reviewers consistently say Preno is easy for hotel teams to learn and operate, which reduces training time and day-to-day friction. This ease of use h... Reviewers consistently say Preno is easy for hotel teams to learn and operate, which reduces training time and day-to-day friction. This ease of use helps staff move faster across reservation, housekeeping, and billing tasks, supporting smoother operations with less manual effort.
Users highlight housekeeping as a strong operational fit, especially the ability to assign tasks and manage room-related workflows efficiently. Review... Users highlight housekeeping as a strong operational fit, especially the ability to assign tasks and manage room-related workflows efficiently. Reviewers say these functions are well designed and save time, helping hotels coordinate rooms more effectively and keep turnover moving.
Several reviews mention bills from different departments and the quality of reports for the finance team. This suggests Preno helps hotels consolidate... Several reviews mention bills from different departments and the quality of reports for the finance team. This suggests Preno helps hotels consolidate charges and improve financial visibility, reducing admin work and supporting better revenue tracking.
Where hoteliers push back
A reviewer notes that Preno could offer more payment options, such as handling early non-refundable payment differently from flexible pre-arrival paym... A reviewer notes that Preno could offer more payment options, such as handling early non-refundable payment differently from flexible pre-arrival payment. This points to a revenue and policy gap for hotels that need more nuanced payment rules to protect income and match booking conditions.
One review explicitly asks for paperless check-in support, showing this is a missing workflow for properties aiming to speed arrivals and reduce front... One review explicitly asks for paperless check-in support, showing this is a missing workflow for properties aiming to speed arrivals and reduce front-desk paperwork. Adding it could improve guest convenience and streamline check-in operations.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 14 and Preno has 83. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property