The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 185 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in Ease of Use and Customer Support — especially for hostel properties (4.7/5), with exclusive features like Mobile App.
Planet shines in functionality and features — especially for vacation rental properties (4.3/5), with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 185 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 128 |
After analyzing 185 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #27 28 reviews | #24 38 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #48 4 reviews | #14 62 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #34 2 reviews | #12 15 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #28 1 reviews | #37 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #33 16 reviews | #20 51 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #45 4 reviews | #20 37 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #44 4 reviews | #17 38 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | #19 11 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | #30 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | #10 100 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #17 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | #14 2 reviews |
Counter and protel PMS serve distinctly different hotel segments, diverging primarily on property type and operational scale. Counter targets hostels and small budget properties with an emphasis on simplicity and automation, boasting a 4.7/5 rating among hostels from 50 reviews. protel PMS, by contrast, supports a broader hotel spectrum including branded, boutique, and luxury hotels, as well as resorts, with significant multi-property and integration capabilities, but with a lower overall rating of 4/5 across 128 reviews.
Both products solve the core problem of property management by automating front desk workflows, managing reservations, and updating availability centrally. Counter simplifies these for smaller, staff-light environments with mobile access and channel management, while protel PMS offers a comprehensive suite aimed at scalable, complex hotel operations integrating payments, CRM, and revenue management.
If your property is a hostel or small budget hotel—particularly with a need for a mobile-friendly, easy-to-learn system and automated night audits—Counter fits best, supported by 83% of its users being hostels and a 4.7/5 rating in that segment. Counter’s limited feature set and integrations reflect its focus on smaller operations; review volume and ratings strongly support this niche fit.
If your hotel is a boutique, branded, or resort property with complex multi-property needs, extensive reporting, and deep integrations, protel PMS is the clear choice based on its 196 verified integrations and 128 reviews spanning multiple hotel types. protel’s 4.1/5 rating among luxury and branded hotels and case studies showing doubled reservations and upsell revenue reinforce its suitability. Reviewers note its complexity and longer onboarding but also its adaptability and extensive feature set.
For hotels operating across multiple regions or requiring multi-currency and multi-lingual support, protel’s capabilities are unmatched. For hostels or small properties prioritizing ease and rapid deployment, Counter is superior. The data is limited for very small independent hotels outside hostels for protel, so Counter’s strong hostel focus is a safer bet there.
Counter outperforms protel PMS on ease of use and onboarding, with respective ratings of 4.6/5 and 4.7/5 compared to protel’s 4.2/5 and 3.8/5. Reviewers of Counter emphasize its intuitive interface requiring minimal staff training; one notes “no teaching necessary” for front desk staff. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well to reduce workload, especially for smaller teams.
protel PMS users find the interface generally intuitive but complex, especially when configuring advanced features and multi-property operations. Several reviews mention that recent updates have made some functions less straightforward and that training resources could be improved. Long onboarding times and difficulty mastering customization are common themes.
Edge: Counter.
protel PMS has a significant feature advantage with 30 unique hotel-relevant features compared to Counter’s 3. protel offers on-premise deployment, integrated revenue management, multi-currency and multi-lingual support, guest CRM, digital registration, PCI and GDPR compliance, task management, and integrated payment terminals. These features support complex workflows, compliance, and broad operational needs for larger hotels and chains.
Counter’s unique features include a built-in channel manager, automated night audit, and a mobile app, which streamline core hostel operations and enable management on the go. These features reflect its focus on front desk efficiency and automation for smaller properties.
The breadth and depth of protel’s features enable more comprehensive revenue optimization, guest communication, and operational control. Counter’s limited but focused feature set suits smaller teams but lacks advanced capabilities like guest profiles or real-time reporting.
Edge: protel PMS.
Counter rates higher in customer support and onboarding with 4.9/5 and 4.7/5 compared to protel’s 4.0/5 and 3.8/5. Reviewers repeatedly praise Counter’s responsive, helpful support team, often naming staff like Evelyn and Max for quick replies and follow-ups. Even negative reviews commend support staff despite software issues.
protel PMS users report mixed experiences with support. Many mention slow response times, difficulty reaching phone support, and delays in issue resolution post-Planet acquisition. A few reviews describe support as competent but inaccessible, which can disrupt operations during critical moments.
Edge: Counter.
protel PMS leads integration counts with 196 verified partners, vastly outnumbering Counter’s 7. Both share key partners like SiteMinder and FLYR Hospitality, but protel includes integrations with major RMS, CRM, BI tools, and specialized revenue management systems such as Right Revenue and Profitroom. This extensive ecosystem enables hotels to connect protel to a wide array of third-party tools for distribution, guest engagement, and operational insights.
Counter’s integrations focus on core platforms relevant for hostels, such as Cloudbeds and Stripe, supporting payment processing and channel management but lacking the breadth for multi-property or multi-functional workflows.
Hotels with complex technology stacks or multi-property needs benefit from protel’s integration scale. Smaller hostels with simpler systems may find Counter’s integrations sufficient.
Edge: protel PMS.
Counter has a higher overall rating of 4.6/5 from 57 reviews, compared to protel’s 4.0/5 from 128 reviews. Counter’s recent reviews are unavailable, but protel’s last six months rating remains steady at 4.0/5 from 20 reviews, indicating stable current satisfaction.
By segment, Counter scores 4.7/5 in hostels (50 reviews) and 4.6/5 in limited service hotels (35 reviews). protel PMS rates highest among branded hotels (4.3/5, 39 reviews), resorts (4.1/5, 20 reviews), and luxury hotels (4.1/5, 37 reviews). protel’s boutique hotel rating is lower at 3.9/5 across 51 reviews, suggesting mixed satisfaction there.
Counter’s ratings reflect strong satisfaction in its core hostel niche, while protel’s ratings show broader but more varied appeal. The review volume and recency favor protel for enterprise and multi-property users, but Counter dominates the hostel segment.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publish pricing, has no implementation fee, no monthly per room or flat fees, and no trial offer. It is described as a free system tailored for hostels, which aligns with user comments on affordability.
protel PMS publishes a base price of $500, with no per-room monthly fees or implementation fees disclosed. No trial is offered. The $500 base price likely reflects a small property or entry-level license, with additional costs for modules, integrations, and customization.
The absence of transparent pricing from Counter limits direct cost comparison, but Counter’s free access model suggests a low barrier to entry versus protel PMS’s upfront cost.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter and protel PMS diverge fundamentally in their target hotel segments and feature depth. Counter serves hostels and small limited-service properties with a focus on ease of use, automation, and affordability, while protel PMS targets larger, branded, and multi-property hotels requiring extensive integrations, advanced revenue management, and multi-currency support.
Choose Counter if you operate a hostel or small property needing rapid deployment, mobile access, and a simple, reliable PMS with automated night audits and integrated channel management. Its top-rated support and high front desk usability reduce training time and operational overhead.
Choose protel PMS if your hotel demands a scalable, feature-rich PMS with robust multi-property management, extensive integrations (196 partners), and advanced guest services like digital registration and revenue management. Its cloud-native platform and comprehensive modules support complex workflows, international operations, and data-driven decision-making despite a steeper learning curve and less responsive support.
In sum, Counter excels in simplicity and support for hostels, while protel PMS provides versatility and depth for larger, multi-functional hotels. The choice hinges on property size, operational complexity, and feature priorities.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Accounting & Finance
|
|
|
| Direct billing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
|
▾
Marketing & Ecommerce
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration & Configuration
|
|
|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| On premise | ||
|
▾
Customer Management
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Front Office
|
|
|
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Groups Management
|
|
|
| Group functionality | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Guest Experience
|
|
|
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Housekeeping
|
|
|
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Payments
|
|
|
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Reservations Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Revenue Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes & Compliance
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Support & Training
|
|
|
| Online 24/7 support | ||
|
▾
Food & Beverage
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module |
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 196. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 4.2/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 14 and Planet has 74. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property