The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Selfie shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Selfie users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Selfie |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Selfie |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Selfie |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Selfie |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. Counter by Counter and Selfie by Selfie both aim to streamline property management but serve vastly different hotel types and needs. Counter is a mature, feature-rich PMS backed by over 50 reviews and recent feedback, while Selfie remains unreviewed and untested in the user community. So, which system truly meets your hotel's needs?
Counter is a comprehensive platform designed specifically for hostels, with a proven track record and a high customer satisfaction rating. Selfie, on the other hand, appears more like an AI review tool without actual hotel management features or user reviews. Given this, the choice is clear: Counter is the product with current, real-world user confidence, making it the better option for your hotel.
Both Counter and Selfie aim to improve hotel operations, yet they do so from dramatically different angles. Counter functions as a full PMS, offering operational tools like booking management, channel distribution, payments, and housekeeper modules. Selfie, however, is an AI-driven review analysis platform designed to provide insights into customer feedback rather than manage operations directly.
Counter has accumulated 54 reviews in the past six months, with a 4.73-star rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend, highlighting customer satisfaction. Selfie has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge reliability or effectiveness. Given the lack of user feedback, Selfie's role remains ambiguous, while Counter clearly meets the core needs of hotel management. Are you seeking a proven PMS or an untested review tool?
If your hotel primarily needs a reliable PMS tailored for hostels or small hotels, go with Counter. Its strong track record, with high ratings from users in Europe, North America, and Asia Pacific, makes it a safe choice. If your hotel’s focus is on harnessing customer reviews for marketing or service enhancement, Selfie might seem relevant—although, without reviews, it’s unverified.
Counter’s features like booking engine, channel manager, payment processing, and guest CRM make it indispensable for operational control. Selfie lacks any comparable features or presence in the hotel management space, so it’s better suited for companies focusing solely on review analysis, not day-to-day hotel management.
Counter earns a 4.6/5 for ease of use from user reviews, with many praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface and quick onboarding process. Hoteliers mention that new staff can learn it fast, and management can handle tasks remotely. Support responsiveness—rated at 4.96/5—also enhances usability, especially with dedicated staff like Evelyn and Max.
Selfie, lacking any user reviews or UI details, cannot be evaluated for ease of use or onboarding. Based on available data, Counter clearly leads here, with a proven, user-friendly interface and excellent onboarding support. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features that are essential for hotel operations: channel management, booking engine, automated night audits, guest profiles, multi-currency support, and more. These are designed specifically to streamline your daily tasks and revenue management.
Selfie, with zero features listed, does not provide operational tools or PMS functionalities. Its value lies solely in review analysis, which is unrelated to core hotel management. Therefore, Counter’s feature set makes it the clear winner. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support team has a 4.96/5 rating, with reviews highlighting responsiveness and helpfulness. Users mention quick replies from staff like Evelyn and Max, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Support is a strong selling point, even though some mention slightly slower responses in certain time zones.
Selfie offers no support ratings, reviews, or evidence of customer service. Without user feedback or a support infrastructure, it cannot match Counter’s proven support reputation. Edge: Counter.
Counter has 7 verified integrations, including channel managers like SiteMinder, Goki, and Stripe for payments. These integrations improve operational flow, revenue management, and online distribution.
Selfie has no listed integrations or verified partners, indicating a lack of connectivity with other systems. For a hotel looking to connect with external platforms, Counter’s integrations are a significant advantage. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s high review count and recent feedback give it a solid 4.73/5 rating, with 91% of users recommending it. Hotels across segments like hostels, inns, and boutique hotels rate it highly for usability, support, and features.
Selfie offers no ratings or reviews, so no hoteliers have expressed satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Based on current data, Counter holds the trust of actual users. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not specify pricing publicly but is known to operate on a paid model, with no free tier or trial mentioned. Its value is reflected in its broad feature set and support, which suggests a premium price point.
Selfie also lacks transparent pricing, and with no user reviews or case studies, its cost structure remains uncertain. For now, Counter’s established pricing model and known value justify its investment.
Given the lack of hotel management features or reviews, Selfie is not suitable for core operational needs but could complement existing systems for reputation management if it develops further.
Counter by Counter is a full-featured PMS already trusted by over 50 hotels, especially hostels, with recent reviews confirming high satisfaction levels. It offers essential tools like booking management, integrations, automation, and excellent support, making it a dependable choice for daily operations.
Selfie by Selfie remains an unverified, review-focused platform with no current user feedback or hotel management features. It’s unsuitable as a core PMS but could be relevant if your hotel prioritizes review analysis—though, with no user validation, that’s speculative.
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable PMS for operational excellence, Counter is the clear winner. Selfie, lacking in validation and features, should be approached cautiously unless your focus is solely on review insights in the future.
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Selfie share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Selfie |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Selfie share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Selfie offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Selfie: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Selfie has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor