The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 94 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in Customer Support and Value for Money — especially for hostel properties (4.7/5), with exclusive features like Mobile App and Guest CRM.
Shiji Group shines in project communication and follow-through — especially for bed & breakfast properties (4.9/5), with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 94 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 37 |
After analyzing 94 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Shiji Group users highlight project communication and follow-through, support availability and responsiveness, minimal issues during rollout. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
+
Project communication and follow-through
▾
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
+
Support availability and responsiveness
▾
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
+
Minimal issues during rollout
▾
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
+
Professionalism and helpfulness of staff
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #27 28 reviews | #59 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #48 4 reviews | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #34 2 reviews | #11 16 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #28 1 reviews | #18 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #33 16 reviews | #32 19 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #45 4 reviews | #26 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #44 4 reviews | #23 20 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | #36 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | #32 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | #31 10 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #17 4 reviews | #15 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #11 2 reviews | #3 15 reviews |
Counter and Shiji Daylight PMS address different hotel operational needs and scales. Counter is optimized for hostels, evidenced by 83% of its users being hostels and a 4.7/5 rating from 50 hostel reviews. It simplifies reservations and automates payments for smaller, high-turnover properties. Shiji Daylight serves a broader hotel spectrum, from boutique to luxury and multi-property groups, with 41% luxury hotels and 16% branded hotels in its user base, plus 4.5/5 ratings across major segments. Both systems solve the core PMS problem: managing reservations, guest data, and billing efficiently, but they diverge sharply in complexity and scale.
Counter’s focus is on intuitive, mobile-friendly operation that reduces admin time for hostels. Shiji Daylight centralizes guest profiles and operations for large or multi-property hotels requiring detailed analytics and integrations. While both have a 4.6/5 overall rating, Counter’s 57 reviews come primarily from small properties, whereas Shiji’s 37 reviews cover a wider hotel range. This makes Counter better for small hostels and Shiji better for larger, multi-property operations.
If you operate a 20-100 bed hostel or a small independent property focused on straightforward, mobile-friendly management, Counter is the better choice, supported by 83% hostel users rating it 4.7/5 across 50 reviews. Counter’s automation of check-in/out and integrated POS saves significant staff time, crucial for small teams. However, its reporting and revenue management features are less mature, so properties needing advanced revenue tools may miss out.
If your hotel is a boutique, branded, luxury, or multi-property group, Shiji Daylight PMS fits best. Its 41% luxury and 16% branded hotel user base, with 4.5/5 ratings from 25 luxury hotel reviews and 21 branded hotel reviews, reflect its strength in handling complex operations and group bookings. Shiji’s cloud-native platform centralizes guest data with a Single Guest Profile, supports multi-currency and multi-lingual workflows, and offers extensive integrations (72 verified partners). For properties that require detailed analytics, robust reporting, and API-driven automation, Shiji is the recommended choice. Data for limited service hotels is thin but leans toward Counter, while Shiji’s versatility covers most other hotel segments.
Both Counter and Shiji Daylight PMS have identical ease-of-use ratings at 4.6/5, with onboarding scores closely matched: 4.7/5 for Counter and 4.5/5 for Shiji. Counter users praise its clean, intuitive interface that requires minimal training—for example, one review notes no need to explain the system to staff, enabling quick adoption. Counter’s mobile and desktop usability supports managers handling tasks remotely, particularly valuable for hostels with lean staffing.
Shiji Daylight’s modern UI aligns with staff digital familiarity, making daily operations smoother, especially in multi-property contexts. Reviewers commend its user experience for reducing complexity despite the system’s enterprise depth. Some users note occasional slowness during peak operations but still find it intuitive.
Edge: Even.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers a much broader feature set with 83 unique features compared to Counter’s 4 unique features beyond their 15 shared capabilities. Shiji’s exclusive features include multi-lingual support, centralized user and role management, task management, tablet/kiosk check-in and checkout, multi-currency billing, integrated CRS, group booking engine, automated reminders, housekeeping modules, real-time reporting, rules-based room assignments, native email marketing, and PCI and GDPR compliance. These features significantly improve operational workflows for larger hotels and chains by automating labor-intensive tasks and enhancing guest personalization.
Counter’s unique features—channel manager, booking engine, mobile app, and guest CRM—focus on core hostel needs, streamlining reservations and guest communications through a straightforward interface. The mobile app and channel manager are particularly helpful for hostels managing high guest turnover and multiple OTAs.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Counter holds a customer support rating of 4.9/5 versus Shiji Daylight’s 4.6/5. Counter’s support team is frequently named in reviews—Evelyn and Max receive specific praise for responsiveness and professionalism. Users report quick resolution of issues and an openness to feature requests, especially valued by smaller properties needing prompt assistance. However, some mention slower responses in certain time zones.
Shiji Daylight’s support is also praised for availability and professionalism. Reviewers highlight clear communication and well-coordinated go-live support, which minimizes operational disruption and builds confidence during implementation. The larger scale and complexity of Shiji’s deployments make this level of support crucial, and its 24/7 availability aids hotels with international operations.
Edge: Counter.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers 72 verified integrations compared to Counter’s 7, sharing 4 integrations including SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Goki, and FLYR Hospitality. Shiji’s extensive integration ecosystem includes revenue management systems like IDeaS and Duetto, distribution partners such as Amadeus and Mews, and guest experience platforms like Revinate and Oaky by Plusgrade.
Counter’s integrations focus on core hostel operations with partners like WuBook, Channex, and Stripe for payments. These integrate essential functions but lack the depth and breadth required for large hotel groups needing sophisticated revenue or guest management tools.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Both products have a 4.6/5 overall rating, but the distribution varies by hotel segment and review volume. Counter has 57 reviews, mostly from hostels (50 reviews at 4.7/5) and limited service hotels (35 reviews at 4.6/5), indicating strong satisfaction in smaller, budget-conscious properties. Shiji Daylight has fewer reviews (37) but covers luxury (25 reviews at 4.5/5), branded hotels (21 reviews at 4.5/5), and boutique hotels (19 reviews at 4.6/5), showing solid ratings in higher-end and multi-property segments.
Recent review volume favors Shiji with 3 new reviews in the last six months versus none for Counter, indicating Shiji’s ratings reflect current product state better.
Edge: Even.
Counter does not publish pricing details, offers no trial, and has no implementation fee. Its freemium or per-room monthly pricing models are not available, suggesting pricing is likely customized or bundled.
Shiji Daylight PMS lists a base price of $1,200, with no freemium or monthly flat or per-room pricing published. There is no trial or implementation fee indicated. This base price likely suits medium to large hotel groups given the platform’s enterprise capabilities.
Without comparable published pricing models, a direct price comparison is not possible.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter and Shiji Daylight PMS address distinct market needs. Counter excels as a streamlined, mobile-friendly PMS tailored for hostels and small independents prioritizing simplicity, rapid onboarding, and responsive support. Shiji Daylight is a comprehensive, cloud-native platform designed for medium to large hotels and multi-property groups requiring advanced features, centralized guest management, and extensive integrations.
Choose Counter if your property is a hostel or small independent seeking an intuitive system with integrated POS and payment automation, backed by highly rated customer support (4.9/5). Its simplicity reduces staff workload and accelerates guest processing. Conversely, choose Shiji Daylight if your hotel demands multi-property scalability, sophisticated revenue management, and a broad ecosystem of integrations (72 verified partners), supported by a platform rated 4.5/5 in luxury and branded segments with proven enterprise deployments.
For hotel operators, the choice hinges on property scale and complexity. Counter offers operational ease and fast adoption for hostels, while Shiji Daylight delivers depth, centralized control, and advanced automation for larger, diversified hotel portfolios.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Accounting & Finance
|
|
|
| Direct billing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
|
▾
Marketing & Ecommerce
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration & Configuration
|
|
|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| On premise | ||
|
▾
Customer Management
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Front Office
|
|
|
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Groups Management
|
|
|
| Group functionality | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Guest Experience
|
|
|
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Housekeeping
|
|
|
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Payments
|
|
|
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Reservations Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Revenue Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes & Compliance
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Support & Training
|
|
|
| Online 24/7 support | ||
|
▾
Food & Beverage
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module |
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Customers emphasize that Shiji's team communicates clearly and keeps stakeholders informed throughout the process. This level of follow-through helps... Customers emphasize that Shiji's team communicates clearly and keeps stakeholders informed throughout the process. This level of follow-through helps hotels avoid confusion during implementation and supports a smoother transition.
Reviews note that Shiji support is readily available when needed and that representatives are helpful and responsive. This gives hotels confidence dur... Reviews note that Shiji support is readily available when needed and that representatives are helpful and responsive. This gives hotels confidence during setup and early use, especially when time-sensitive issues arise.
The feedback suggests very few problems with the installation itself, and any hiccups were attributed to the hotel's internal disorganization rather t... The feedback suggests very few problems with the installation itself, and any hiccups were attributed to the hotel's internal disorganization rather than Shiji. For buyers, this implies lower implementation risk and a more predictable deployment.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 72. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 14 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property