The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Sigh Ulyses shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Sigh Ulyses users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Sigh Ulyses by Sigh Ulyses hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Counter is a property management system (PMS) built specifically for hostels, offering a suite of features designed to streamline daily operations, while Sigh Ulyses focuses primarily on customer review analysis and feedback management, with no concrete PMS functionality. Given this, your decision should consider whether you need a full PMS or a tool to enhance guest satisfaction insights.
Counter’s clear focus on hostel management, coupled with its extensive feature set and high user ratings, makes it a compelling choice if operational efficiency is your priority. Sigh Ulyses, on the other hand, offers no current reviews or proven hotel management features, making it less suitable if your goal is to manage reservations, housekeeping, and revenue effectively.
So, is your hotel seeking an all-in-one PMS or a review analysis tool? The answer will guide your choice.
Counter is a PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, with 54 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.73/5, emphasizing its usability, support, and feature depth. Sigh Ulyses, lacking any reviews and not identified as a PMS, offers no direct management features or recent hotel-specific feedback, making it difficult to evaluate its effectiveness for hotel operations.
Counter’s review highlights include its user-friendly interface, automation capabilities, and support responsiveness, with users claiming it’s “the best PMS for hostels.” Conversely, Sigh Ulyses provides an AI-driven review analysis platform, but without specific hotel management features or recent user feedback, it cannot be directly compared on operational grounds.
Ultimately, Counter’s proven hotel-specific functionality and recent reviews give it the edge for management needs. Are you looking for a proven PMS or a review analysis tool? Your answer clarifies the better fit.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive PMS with channel management, booking engine, guest CRM, and reporting, Counter is the clear choice. Its features cater directly to hostels, with 19 unique functionalities, a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating, and verified integrations with seven partners like Stripe and SiteMinder.
If, however, your goal is to analyze customer feedback, extract insights, and improve guest satisfaction through AI summaries and recommendations, Sigh Ulyses might be relevant. But with no recent reviews, hotel segment-specific data, or operational features, it’s unsuitable as your primary management system.
For operational efficiency and management control, Counter is the definitive pick. For feedback insights without management capabilities, Sigh Ulyses doesn’t currently stand out.
Counter’s user interface receives a 4.6/5 rating, with reviews praising its intuitive, clean design and quick staff onboarding. Users find it straightforward to learn and teach, with positive feedback on its mobile app and ease of calendar management.
Sigh Ulyses, lacking any user ratings or reviews, offers no data on usability or onboarding experience. Without evidence of its interface or ease of adoption, it’s impossible to compare usability.
Edge: Counter. Its high ease-of-use rating, recent positive reviews, and clear interface make it the better choice for immediate staff training and daily operations.
Counter offers 19 distinct features, including channel management, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and housekeepings modules. These features directly support daily hotel operations, revenue tracking, and guest management.
Sigh Ulyses provides no features explicitly tailored for hotel management. It is an AI review analysis platform, not a PMS, and offers no management functions or operational tools.
Given the feature counts and functionality, Counter’s comprehensive suite makes it the leader for hotel management. Sigh Ulyses lacks management features entirely; therefore, Counter has the advantage.
Counter’s support team is rated 4.96/5, with recent reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. Hoteliers appreciate its responsiveness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, though some mention slower support in certain time zones.
Sigh Ulyses has no published customer support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess support quality. Its lack of recent hotel-specific feedback further diminishes confidence.
Edge: Counter. Its high support ratings and recent positive reviews demonstrate a reliable, responsive support team essential for operational continuity.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including channel managers WuBook, SiteMinder, and Cloudbeds, plus Stripe for payments. These integrations facilitate multi-platform booking, payment processing, and access control, essential for modern property management.
Sigh Ulyses does not list any integrations or partnerships, focusing solely on AI review analysis. Its lack of operational integrations makes it less applicable for managing hotel systems.
Counter’s multiple integrations give it the clear advantage for streamlining management workflows. Sigh Ulyses is not comparable in this area.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews yield an overall rating of 4.73/5, with a 91% likelihood to recommend among hostel operators and small hotels. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, especially noting its suitability for hostel management.
Sigh Ulyses has no reviews or ratings from hoteliers, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or property-specific feedback.
Based on recent data, Counter is the higher-rated solution by a wide margin. Sigh Ulyses lacks enough hotel-specific feedback to compare meaningfully.
Counter does not publicly disclose pricing details but offers a free, easy-to-use platform tailored for hostels without mention of hidden fees or implementation costs. It appears accessible for small properties and startups.
Sigh Ulyses also offers no explicit pricing info, focusing on AI feedback analysis. Given its SaaS nature, it likely operates on a subscription model, but details are unavailable.
Both products lack transparent pricing, emphasizing the need for direct vendor contact. For management, Counter’s value is clearer given its feature set and recent reviews.
Not ideal if your property requires advanced revenue management, extensive reporting, or sophisticated group booking features. Larger hotel chains with complex operations should look elsewhere.
Not ideal if you need a PMS, reservation management, or operational tools. Sigh Ulyses is best suited for feedback-driven strategies rather than property management.
Counter is a full-featured PMS designed specifically for hostels and small hotels, with 19 management features, high user ratings, and proven integrations. Its focus on operational efficiency and ease of use makes it suitable for properties seeking to streamline daily tasks and increase occupancy.
Sigh Ulyses, lacking management features and recent hotel reviews, is primarily an AI review analysis tool. It does not currently support hotel operations or revenue management, limiting its utility for property managers.
If your goal is comprehensive management, Counter is the clear choice. If your focus is on extracting insights from customer reviews, Sigh Ulyses may be useful, but it’s not a management system.
This comparative review underscores Counter’s strong management capabilities backed by recent high ratings and a broad feature set, making it the better option for hoteliers seeking operational control. Sigh Ulyses is not positioned as a PMS and lacks hotel-specific data; for management purposes, it falls short. Your decision should align with whether you prioritize operational efficiency or guest feedback analysis, with Counter clearly leading for management needs.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Sigh Ulyses share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Sigh Ulyses share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Sigh Ulyses offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Sigh Ulyses: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Sigh Ulyses has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor