The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 105 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CQR shines .
Sirvoy shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 105 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 105 |
After analyzing 105 verified reviews, CQR users most value its , while Sirvoy users highlight customer support, ease of use, reservation management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| CQR |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface and Design
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Functionality Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Adaptability
▾
|
|
|
−
Cost and Value for Money
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #22 36 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #48 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #27 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #29 21 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #37 7 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #42 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #35 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #23 16 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #16 31 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #13 6 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
Choosing between CQR PMS by CQR and Sirvoy hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and growth plans. While CQR offers a basic, no-frills approach with zero reviews and features, Sirvoy provides an extensive suite of tools backed by nearly 100 reviews and recent positive feedback. Your team must weigh ease of use, feature set, support, and cost to determine which system aligns with your operational priorities.
CQR’s lack of recent reviews and limited features suggest it may not meet modern hotel management demands. Conversely, Sirvoy’s well-established presence and high customer satisfaction position it as the more reliable choice today. So, which system is truly better suited to your hotel’s future?
CQR PMS aims to serve hotels with a straightforward property management approach, but its zero reviews and absence of features make it difficult to assess its capabilities. Sirvoy, on the other hand, is praised for its user-friendly interface, wide feature set, and recent reviews from nearly 100 users, making it a more dependable option.
Where CQR appears to be an untested solution with no publicly available customer feedback, Sirvoy’s current reviews highlight its ease of use, support quality, and functional breadth. Are you comfortable adopting a system without clear real-world validation, or do recent, detailed reviews give you more confidence?
If your hotel needs a simple, no-cost solution for basic management tasks, and you’re willing to accept an unreviewed platform, CQR might suffice. However, if you seek a comprehensive, reliable PMS with proven customer support and ongoing updates, Sirvoy is the clear winner.
For small to medium-sized hotels prioritizing ease of use, customer support, and flexible features, Sirvoy’s 95 reviews and recent 32 reviews in the last six months demonstrate its ongoing relevance and customer satisfaction. CQR’s lack of reviews makes it an uncertain choice for hotels valuing proven performance.
CQR’s ease of use cannot be evaluated due to no available user reviews or ratings, leaving its usability unknown. Sirvoy, rated 4.64 out of 5 from nearly 100 reviews, is widely recognized as intuitive, straightforward, and quick to onboard, even for users new to hotel management software.
Reviewers consistently praise Sirvoy’s simple interface and helpful onboarding process, which reduces training time and accelerates implementation. Edge: Sirvoy.
CQR offers zero features, providing no details on what it includes beyond basic property management. Sirvoy, with 43 features, covers booking management, channel management, guest communication, online check-in, payment processing, and more—features that are critical for modern hotel operations.
While CQR’s minimal offering might appeal to very small or niche properties, Sirvoy’s extensive feature set caters to hotels seeking automation, multi-channel distribution, and guest engagement tools. Edge: Sirvoy.
CQR’s customer support ratings and review details are nonexistent, making support quality impossible to evaluate. Sirvoy, rated 4.85 out of 5 from 95 reviews, consistently receives praise for quick, helpful, and responsive support, with many reviewers citing exceptional assistance during onboarding and day-to-day operations.
Support quality can be a decisive factor, especially when adopting a new system. With clear positive feedback, Sirvoy holds the advantage. Edge: Sirvoy.
CQR has no verified integration partners listed, limiting its ability to connect with other tools or channels. Sirvoy boasts 21 verified integrations, including major OTAs like Booking.com and Expedia, payment providers, and marketing tools like TrustYou and Revinate.
This extensive integration ecosystem allows your hotel to automate workflows, sync reservations, and enhance guest communication easily. Edge: Sirvoy.
CQR’s review count and recent feedback are absent, leaving its rating performance unknown. Sirvoy’s 83.9 out of 100 score and 94% likelihood to recommend from nearly 100 reviews establish its strong reputation among hoteliers.
Recent reviews highlight its user-friendliness and support as key strengths, making it the preferred choice among small to medium properties. Edge: Sirvoy.
CQR’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may not have a transparent or established fee structure. Sirvoy charges a $200 monthly base fee, with no implementation or additional room fees, and offers a 30-day trial.
While the monthly fee may be seen as an investment, Sirvoy’s comprehensive feature set and support justify the cost for most hotels. CQR’s unclear pricing makes it difficult to compare value directly.
Not ideal if:
Given the lack of reviews and features, CQR is best suited only for very small or experimental properties.
Not ideal if:
Sirvoy is ideal for properties focused on guest experience, operational simplicity, and online distribution.
CQR offers a bare-bones approach with no available features, reviews, or recent customer feedback, so it’s difficult to endorse for modern hotel management. Its lack of validation makes it unsuitable for hotels seeking reliable, proven tools.
Sirvoy, with a high customer rating, extensive feature set, and recent, positive reviews, clearly demonstrates its value for small to medium hotels looking for an intuitive, well-supported PMS. Its integrations, online booking, and support infrastructure make it the more dependable choice.
If your hotel values proven performance, consistent support, and a rich set of features, Sirvoy should be your pick. However, if your needs are extremely limited and cost is a primary concern, and you're comfortable with an unreviewed solution, CQR could be considered—but with significant risk.
In conclusion, for most hotels making a decision today, Sirvoy’s recent reviews and established reputation strongly favor it over CQR.
According to HTR's product database, CQR PMS and Sirvoy share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 31 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suite... Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suites or offering package deals are noted as areas that require enhancement.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved fin... Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved financial and invoicing features. There's also feedback on the lack of advanced CRM options and difficulties in integrating upselling features.
Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wis... Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wish for more flexibility in invoice customization and dynamic billing options.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CQR PMS and Sirvoy share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CQR PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Sirvoy offers 21. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Sirvoy leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CQR PMS: No. Sirvoy: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CQR has an HT Score of 0 and Sirvoy has 85. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor