The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 174 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CWT shines .
Proposales shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.3/5) , with exclusive features like Online payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 174 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 174 |
After analyzing 174 verified reviews, CWT users most value its , while Proposales users highlight ease of use, aesthetics and presentation, customization and personalization. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| CWT |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Aesthetics and Presentation
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Personalization
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Follow-up and Communication
▾
|
|
|
−
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
Error Handling and Frustrations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among RFPs & Proposal Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | CWT |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 10 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 77 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 62 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #1 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | CWT |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 82 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #1 47 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #1 76 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | CWT |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #8 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 170 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #4 0 reviews |
Choosing between CWT Easy Meetings and Proposales depends on your hotel’s specific needs for proposal management and event planning. Both products aim to streamline hotel operations but serve different core functions—CWT Easy Meetings focuses on event booking, while Proposales specializes in proposal automation and sales efficiency. Your decision hinges on whether your team needs a meeting-centric platform or a proposal-focused solution.
Proposales currently holds a significant advantage with a higher review count, recent positive feedback, and a higher overall rating. CWT Easy Meetings, by contrast, has no recent reviews and a negligible user base, which makes it difficult to assess its current suitability. Is your hotel looking for proven, modern proposal management or an event planning tool?
CWT Easy Meetings offers a platform designed to simplify venue searches, booking, and event coordination, emphasizing centralized event management. However, it lacks recent reviews and a user community to validate its ongoing effectiveness. Conversely, Proposales is a proposal management platform with a robust user base, frequent recent reviews, and high ratings, making it a more reliable choice for sales acceleration.
While CWT Easy Meetings might appeal to hotels heavily involved in event organization, Proposales targets sales teams looking for faster, more engaging proposal workflows. Given the current review data, Proposales clearly demonstrates proven success in the hotel industry, whereas CWT’s offering remains unverified today.
If your hotel needs a dedicated proposal management system with automation, collaboration, and multimedia support, go with Proposales. Its 158 reviews and recent 4.72/5 rating underscore its reliability and user satisfaction.
If your team primarily requires an event booking platform for meetings and venue management, CWT Easy Meetings might seem suitable. But given the lack of recent reviews and no verifiable user feedback, it’s hard to recommend it over Proposales for sales tasks.
For hotels prioritizing proposal efficiency, customization, and integration, Proposales sets the standard. For those focused solely on event booking, further validation of CWT’s platform is necessary before making a commitment.
Proposales boasts a 4.81/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews from 12 hotel clients, indicating high user satisfaction. Reviewers praise its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and straightforward proposal creation process, making it accessible even for team members new to proposal management software.
CWT Easy Meetings has no recent reviews or user feedback available, so its usability is unverified presently. Without current data, it’s challenging to compare its user experience with Proposales.
Edge: Proposales.
Proposales offers 11 distinct features, including automated responses, team collaboration, online payments, digital signatures, templates library, real-time availability, and dynamic pricing—capabilities that significantly enhance proposal workflows. It supports multimedia inclusion, making proposals more engaging and adaptable.
CWT Easy Meetings does not list any features in the available data, suggesting either limited or unverified functionality. Given Proposales’ comprehensive feature set, it clearly provides more tools to streamline proposal management.
Edge: Proposales.
Proposales’s support and onboarding ratings are close to 4.8/5, with recent reviews emphasizing fast, helpful assistance and smooth onboarding processes. Clients describe the support team as solutions-oriented and responsive, reducing frustration and enhancing user confidence.
CWT Easy Meetings has no recent reviews or verified customer support data, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Based on current evidence, Proposales outperforms in support and user onboarding.
Edge: Proposales.
Proposales offers integrations with seven verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Stripe, and others, enabling better data flow and operational efficiency. These integrations support common hotel systems and facilitate faster proposal generation and management.
CWT Easy Meetings shows no verified integrations in the available data, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel software. For hotels seeking flexible integration options, Proposales is the clear choice.
Edge: Proposales.
Proposales has a 4.77/5 average rating from 149 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its speed, customization, and ease of use. Hotel users from various segments, especially city center and branded hotels, rate it highly for boosting sales efficiency.
CWT Easy Meetings has no recent reviews or average ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on current review volume and scores, Proposales is the more trusted option among hoteliers.
Edge: Proposales.
CWT Easy Meetings does not publish pricing details or offer a free trial, making its cost structure uncertain. This opacity complicates budgeting and comparison.
Proposales charges a base fee of $400 per month, with no additional implementation or setup fees. Its clear pricing model allows hotels to evaluate ROI more confidently.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on proposal generation or sales automation, as CWT’s proposal features are unverified and unreviewed.
Not ideal if your hotel is primarily concerned with event booking without needing proposal management or sales automation tools.
Proposales offers a modern, feature-rich proposal management system with proven user success and recent high ratings, making it an ideal choice for hotels seeking to boost sales efficiency. Its strong support, integrations, and customization set it apart as a reliable, scalable solution.
CWT Easy Meetings, while potentially useful for event planning, remains unverified with no recent reviews or confirmed features. If your hotel’s focus is on proposal automation and sales growth, Proposales is the clear, data-backed recommendation.
In conclusion, for hotels wanting tangible, recent validation and a tool proven to accelerate proposal workflows, Proposales is the stronger option. For event-centric hotels with established event management needs, further validation of CWT Easy Meetings is necessary before proceeding.
RFPs & Proposal Management Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| CWT |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
According to HTR's product database, CWT Easy Meetings and Proposales share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | CWT |
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Responses | ||
| Content & File Management | ||
| Digital Signatures | ||
| Online payments | ||
| Response Management | ||
| Team Collaboration |
What hoteliers love
The software is widely regarded as user-friendly, making it easy for hotel teams to navigate and leverage effectively. Its intuitive design allows qui... The software is widely regarded as user-friendly, making it easy for hotel teams to navigate and leverage effectively. Its intuitive design allows quick onboarding of new team members and simplifies proposal creation and management.
The visual appeal of Proposales is frequently praised, with users noting that its modern, professional presentation of proposals helps to make a stron... The visual appeal of Proposales is frequently praised, with users noting that its modern, professional presentation of proposals helps to make a strong impression on clients and supports the sales process effectively.
Many users praise Proposales for its ability to customize and personalize proposals according to specific client needs, allowing for the addition of i... Many users praise Proposales for its ability to customize and personalize proposals according to specific client needs, allowing for the addition of images, videos, and personal notes, which adds a personal touch and aids in standing out to clients.
Where hoteliers push back
The tool lacks robust features for managing follow-up reminders and internal communication, making it difficult to streamline communications with pros... The tool lacks robust features for managing follow-up reminders and internal communication, making it difficult to streamline communications with prospects and internal teams, which could improve the proposal management process.
Users appreciate the analytics features that allow for measuring and comparing statistics, helping them make data-driven decisions to improve proposal... Users appreciate the analytics features that allow for measuring and comparing statistics, helping them make data-driven decisions to improve proposal strategies. However, some indicate room for improvement in this area to maximize its potential.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CWT Easy Meetings and Proposales share many core RFPs & Proposal Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. CWT Easy Meetings offers 0 verified integration partners, while Proposales offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Proposales leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CWT Easy Meetings: No. Proposales: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most RFPs & Proposal Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CWT has an HT Score of 0 and Proposales has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor