The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 46 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Dataria shines in customer support and ROI , with exclusive features like Controlled Automation/Algorithm Customization and Market Insights Reporting.
Infor shines when it comes to customer support — especially for brand properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Contact Management/CRM and Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 46 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 6 | 40 |
After analyzing 46 verified reviews, Dataria users most value its , while Infor users highlight customer support, reporting capabilities, forecasting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Forecasting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Rate Recommendations
▾
|
|
|
−
Forecast Accuracy
▾
|
|
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Revenue Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #34 2 reviews | #43 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #43 2 reviews | #24 11 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 19 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #11 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #43 1 reviews | #24 19 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #18 23 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #43 1 reviews | #15 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #35 1 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #26 1 reviews | #22 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #30 3 reviews | #28 6 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #7 21 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #16 1 reviews |
Choosing between Dataria’s Automatic Pricing and Infor EzRMS hinges on your hotel’s specific revenue management needs and your team's capacity for system complexity. Both systems aim to enhance your pricing strategies, but they approach this goal differently: Dataria offers an automated, data-driven pricing engine, while Infor provides a comprehensive, customizable revenue management platform. Which solution aligns best with your operational style and strategic priorities?
Dataria’s platform boasts a limited but highly focused feature set, emphasizing automatic, algorithm-based pricing with minimal manual intervention. In contrast, Infor EzRMS offers a broader suite of tools, including detailed forecasting, reporting, and integration capabilities, suitable for larger or more complex hotel portfolios. So, do you want a straightforward, automated approach or a full-scale revenue management system?
Your decision should be guided by your hotel’s size, complexity, and level of revenue management sophistication. Dataria excels for smaller hotels or boutique properties seeking an easy-to-implement, automated pricing tool that reduces manual work and enhances revenue with minimal fuss. Since it has a very limited number of reviews—just 4—and no recent feedback, trust in its current performance is limited, but its high support score suggests solid service.
Conversely, Infor EzRMS, with 39 reviews and recent positive feedback, is better suited for larger properties or hotel chains managing multiple properties and seeking detailed forecasting, reporting, and customization. Its extensive feature set and broader market presence make it a more versatile choice, but it may require more training and management effort. Which profile more closely matches your hotel’s needs?
Both platforms are rated very similarly for ease of use, with Dataria scoring 4.5/5 and Infor EzRMS 4.49/5. Dataria’s streamlined interface is praised for its intuitiveness, and its onboarding process receives perfect scores from users, suggesting a gentle learning curve. Customer reviews highlight its straightforward setup, but limited documentation can slow new team members.
Infor EzRMS also scores high on usability, with a user-friendly, modular interface. Nonetheless, some users report that mastering its advanced features requires specific knowledge and training, especially for accurate forecast and rate recommendations. Given the current review counts, the edge goes to Dataria for simplicity.
Dataria offers 34 features unique to its system, including price explanation, scenario analysis, set boundaries, and multi-property dashboards. These tools support flexible, automated pricing adjustments, business mix optimization, and detailed market intelligence. Its features emphasize automation, customization, and control—key for hotels wanting to minimize manual input.
Infor EzRMS provides 13 exclusive features, such as contact management, task management, and mobile app support. While these enhance operational and communication workflows, they are less focused on pricing automation. Its core strength lies in detailed demand forecasting, extensive reporting, and integration capabilities. The clear edge in features favors Dataria for dedicated revenue management automation.
Dataria’s customer support scores a perfect 5/5, with reviewers praising their availability, understanding of the hotel business, and personalized onboarding. Users note that support is responsive and helps them adapt the system to their needs, making it particularly attractive for smaller hotels or those new to revenue management automation.
Infor EzRMS’s support, rated 4.04/5, is appreciated for responsiveness and problem-solving, but some users note that support can sometimes be delayed or less tailored. Feedback highlights that stability issues or broken functionalities following updates can challenge users, especially when support response times are longer. The edge here firmly goes to Dataria.
Infor EzRMS boasts 113 verified integrations, including major PMS and booking engine systems like Mews, Omnibees, and Fairmas. This extensive connectivity is ideal for hotels with complex systems or those seeking to unify various operational tools.
Dataria, with only 3 verified partners, including Neobookings and Mews, offers limited integration options. While sufficient for smaller properties, it may require manual data handling for larger, integrated systems. The clear winner for extensive connectivity is Infor EzRMS.
Despite its limited review count, Dataria’s reviews are highly positive, with a 10/5 NPS score and 100% likelihood to recommend. Users emphasize its support, simplicity, and the impact on revenue, though the lack of recent reviews limits confidence in current performance.
Infor EzRMS has a broader user base, with 28 reviews over the last six months, and an average rating of 4.44/5. Many praise its detailed reports and automation but cite forecast inaccuracies and occasional system issues. Given the recent, more extensive feedback, Infor’s rating is more reflective of current satisfaction.
Dataria charges a straightforward $400 per month, with no implementation or trial fees, making it accessible for small to mid-sized hotels. No pricing details are available for Infor EzRMS, which is typically tailored to larger properties or chains and often involves bespoke quotes based on scale and modules.
Your budget and size will influence your choice: if affordability and ease are priorities, Dataria offers a simple, predictable cost. For larger operations with complex needs, Infor’s pricing is likely more variable but potentially more comprehensive.
Not ideal if your hotel requires detailed forecasting, multi-system integrations, or extensive operational management tools. Larger or more complex properties may find Dataria’s limited feature set insufficient for their needs.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited staff or budget, and primarily needs a simple pricing tool. Infor’s complexity and cost may be overkill for boutique or independent properties seeking only basic automation.
The core difference lies in scope and complexity. Dataria focuses on automating room pricing with a highly tailored, easy-to-use approach, ideal for smaller properties seeking quick wins. Infor EzRMS offers a broader, more detailed platform, suitable for larger hotels or chains aiming for comprehensive revenue management.
Choose Dataria if your hotel prioritizes automation, simplicity, and support, especially at a manageable price point. Opt for Infor EzRMS if you need extensive forecasting, integration, and operational control, and have the resources to manage its complexity.
For hotels seeking a proven, easy-to-implement automated pricing system, Dataria is the clear winner—more recent reviews, higher support scores, and a focused feature set make it the better choice. Larger, multi-property hotels or those requiring advanced analytics and system integrations should lean toward Infor EzRMS, despite its steeper learning curve and higher costs.
In summary:
According to HTR's product database, Automatic Pricing (by Dataria) and Infor EzRMS share 19 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| "What-if" scenario analysis | ||
| Business Mix Optimization | ||
| Client Communication Portal | ||
| Contact Management/CRM | ||
| Content & File Management | ||
| Itinerary Printouts | ||
| Manage Exceptions | ||
| Manage Sell-Outs & Cancellations | ||
| Price Explanation | ||
| Seating Management | ||
| Set Boundaries | ||
| Task Management (Tasks & Reminders) |
Showing top differences. 35 more features differ between these products.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
EzRMS's customer support receives high praise for responsiveness and efficacy, particularly in terms of solving technical issues quickly. However, the... EzRMS's customer support receives high praise for responsiveness and efficacy, particularly in terms of solving technical issues quickly. However, there are suggestions for expanding support hours and having dedicated teams for specific markets.
EzRMS's reporting suite is praised for its flexibility and depth, allowing comprehensive data comparisons and trend analyses. It is effective for both... EzRMS's reporting suite is praised for its flexibility and depth, allowing comprehensive data comparisons and trend analyses. It is effective for both retrospective and predictive business monitoring, aiding in better strategic planning and decision-making.
The system offers extensive support for forecasting, reducing manual input for revenue managers and delivering actionable insights. However, some user... The system offers extensive support for forecasting, reducing manual input for revenue managers and delivering actionable insights. However, some users feel that the system's predictions are sometimes inaccurate and require further refinement to improve reliability.
Where hoteliers push back
EzRMS provides detailed rate recommendations, which users find helpful for optimizing revenue. However, some users report difficulties with the accura... EzRMS provides detailed rate recommendations, which users find helpful for optimizing revenue. However, some users report difficulties with the accuracy and automation of rate uploads, and there's room for improving synchronization with other systems to prevent issues like rate discrepancies.
Many users report issues with the forecast accuracy of EzRMS, although improvements have been noted with recent algorithm updates. There is a general... Many users report issues with the forecast accuracy of EzRMS, although improvements have been noted with recent algorithm updates. There is a general sentiment that while the tool is powerful, forecasts can sometimes diverge significantly from actual outcomes, especially amid dynamic conditions like the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Automatic Pricing (by Dataria) and Infor EzRMS share many core Revenue Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Automatic Pricing (by Dataria) offers 3 verified integration partners, while Infor EzRMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Automatic Pricing (by Dataria) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Automatic Pricing (by Dataria): No. Infor EzRMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Revenue Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Dataria has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 25. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor