The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 44 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Diamo shines when it comes to dynamic pricing and revenue maximization , with exclusive features like Dynamic Price Hierarchy Control and Yield Room Types Individually.
SHR Group shines , with exclusive features like Fully automated revenue management and Mobile Friendly Design.
Side-by-side ratings based on 44 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 27 | 17 |
After analyzing 44 verified reviews, Diamo users most value its dynamic pricing and revenue maximization, ease of use, customer support, while SHR Group users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Dynamic Pricing and Revenue Maximization
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Comp Set Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Automated and Customized Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
Issues with Data Syncing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Revenue Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #17 22 reviews | #33 3 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #44 2 reviews | #29 8 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #29 1 reviews | #20 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #14 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #22 19 reviews | #32 8 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #25 9 reviews | #30 7 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #31 2 reviews | #22 7 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #29 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #29 24 reviews | #17 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #43 1 reviews | #26 7 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #10 3 reviews |
Choosing the right revenue management system (RMS) is crucial for your hotel's profitability and operational efficiency. Both Diamo by Diamo and SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) by SHR Group aim to optimize revenue through automation and data insights but differ significantly in approach, features, and market presence. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize ease of use and specialized features or comprehensive automation and broader integration options.
Diamo offers a user-friendly, AI-driven platform with a focus on small to mid-sized hotels, while SHR Group provides a more extensive, fully automated system suited for larger or multi-property operations. Which product aligns better with your hotel's size, complexity, and strategic goals?
Both Diamo and SHR Group target hotels seeking to enhance revenue through data-backed pricing strategies. Diamo emphasizes simplicity, manual control, and real-time insights aimed at boutique and independent hotels, especially those with limited data or smaller teams. SHR Group, on the other hand, offers a highly automated, AI-powered platform capable of managing complex, multi-property portfolios with full control over revenue strategies.
Diamo’s focus on ease of use and customizable dashboards appeals to properties that prefer a more hands-on approach, whereas SHR’s broader feature set and automation suit hotels that want minimal manual intervention. Do you need a flexible, intuitive system or a fully automated solution that handles a larger portfolio efficiently?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-navigate system with some manual control, Diamo is the better choice. It’s ideal for boutique or independent properties that value user-friendly interfaces and real-time market insights, which are reflected in its high ease-of-use rating (4.83/5) and high customer support scores (4.96/5).
If your hotel requires full automation, detailed forecasting, group management, and extensive integrations, SHR Group is the superior option. It suits larger hotels or chains with complex revenue strategies, thanks to features like AI-driven forecasting, multi-property dashboards, and over 80 verified integrations, despite a slightly lower ease-of-use rating (4.87/5).
The choice depends on whether you prioritize control and customization (Diamo) or automation and scalability (SHR). Which approach aligns with your team’s current capabilities and growth plans?
Diamo’s interface scores a 4.83/5 and is praised for its clarity and simplicity, making onboarding quick and staff adoption straightforward. Users highlight its intuitive dashboards and ease of navigating complex data, especially for small teams or boutique hotels.
SHR Group also scores highly at 4.87/5, with many users noting its straightforward user experience despite its extensive features. Support for onboarding is consistent across both platforms, with SHR’s proven track record in helping larger teams get up to speed.
Edge: SHR Group.
Diamo boasts 4 unique features, including dynamic price hierarchy control, yield room type management, interactive dashboards, and real-time price optimization, tailored to small-scale operations. Its feature set is focused on manual adjustments and market trend tracking, suitable for properties that want some control but don’t need automation.
SHR Group offers 25 unique features, including fully automated revenue management, guided workflows, group pricing, open pricing, business intelligence, and advanced forecasting tools. Its expanded feature set supports multi-property management, complex strategies, and full automation, making it the more comprehensive choice.
Edge: SHR Group.
Both products excel in support, with Diamo earning a 4.96/5 rating and SHR Group a 4.93/5, reflecting high satisfaction among users. Diamo’s customers praise its responsive, human support team and strategic guidance, often mentioning the high quality of assistance during onboarding and ongoing use.
SHR Group’s support is also highly rated, with users appreciating the proactive service and clear reporting. Testimonials highlight their knowledgeable team and quick issue resolution, essential for larger or multi-property operations.
Edge: Diamo.
Diamo integrates with 7 verified partners, including Cloudbeds, Beds24, and Little Hotelier, primarily focusing on the most common PMS and booking engine integrations for smaller properties. Its partner list is growing but limited compared to SHR.
SHR Group boasts 81 verified integrations, including critical partners like Criton, MSI Solutions, and OpenHotel, supporting a wide range of PMS, channel managers, and revenue tools. Its extensive partner network makes it more flexible for larger hotels with complex tech stacks.
Edge: SHR Group.
Diamo has a review count of 24, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, user-friendly dashboards, and excellent customer support. Its average review scores highlight strong satisfaction among boutique and independent hoteliers, especially those seeking control and simplicity.
SHR Group, with 15 reviews, is rated equally highly for support and ease of use but is more often praised by larger hotel operators managing multiple properties. The platform’s automation capabilities and extensive features earn high marks from these users.
Edge: SHR Group.
Diamo charges a straightforward $600 monthly fee without a trial or freemium options. Pricing details for SHR Group are not publicly available, but it is typically tailored based on property count and feature needs, often suited for larger hotel groups.
Diamo’s transparent pricing appeals to small and mid-sized hotels, while SHR’s custom quotes indicate a focus on larger, multi-property operations with complex requirements. Are you comfortable with fixed pricing or expecting a more tailored quote based on your hotel’s size?
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Diamo and SHR Group both aim to improve your revenue but serve different hotel profiles. Diamo’s strength lies in its ease of use, manual control, and appealing interface for boutique or independent hotels. SHR Group excels in automation, extensive integrations, and managing complex, multi-property portfolios.
Choose Diamo if you want a straightforward, budget-friendly platform with strong support and manual controls. Opt for SHR Group if your hotel requires comprehensive automation, full-featured forecasting, and can leverage its extensive partner network.
For small to mid-sized hotels seeking control and simplicity, Diamo is the clear choice. Larger properties or hotel groups aiming for automation and scalability should select SHR Group.
According to HTR's product database, Diamo and SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) share 15 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Room-Type Pricing | ||
| Dynamic Price Hierarchy Control | ||
| Fully automated revenue management | ||
| Group pricing & evaluation | ||
| Guided workflows | ||
| Interactive Customizable Dashboards | ||
| Open Pricing | ||
| Real-time price optimization | ||
| Scheduled Reports | ||
| Yield Room Types Individually |
Showing top differences. 17 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Many users praised Diamo's dynamic pricing for its ability to align rates with market trends and competitor pricing, making it a game-changer for smal... Many users praised Diamo's dynamic pricing for its ability to align rates with market trends and competitor pricing, making it a game-changer for small businesses focused on maximizing revenue without manual intervention.
Reviewers appreciated the software's simplicity and ease of navigation, which facilitates a smooth user experience. This was particularly beneficial f... Reviewers appreciated the software's simplicity and ease of navigation, which facilitates a smooth user experience. This was particularly beneficial for small teams and independent hotel operators.
Diamo's customer service consistently receives high praise for its responsiveness and expertise. The support team effectively assists with strategy ad... Diamo's customer service consistently receives high praise for its responsiveness and expertise. The support team effectively assists with strategy adjustments and software guidance, ensuring a reliable fail-safe for users.
Where hoteliers push back
Users noted the value of automating pricing and generating reports. However, some expressed a desire for enhanced reporting features, such as automati... Users noted the value of automating pricing and generating reports. However, some expressed a desire for enhanced reporting features, such as automatic or configurable reports.
A few users noted inconsistencies or delays in OTA data syncing, leading to potential discrepancies in rate alignment with competitors.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. Diamo and SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) share many core Revenue Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Diamo offers 7 verified integration partners, while SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) offers 81. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Diamo: No. SHR Revenue Management System (RMS): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Revenue Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Diamo has an HT Score of 75 and SHR Group has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor