The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 46 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
DJUBO shines in ease of use and onboarding , with exclusive features like Guest Feedback Management and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Noovy shines when it comes to ease of use , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
Side-by-side ratings based on 46 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 19 | 27 |
After analyzing 46 verified reviews, DJUBO users most value its , while Noovy users highlight ease of use, channel connectivity, all-in-one functionality. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Connectivity
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-One Functionality
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Translation Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #31 3 reviews | #27 13 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #43 0 reviews | #19 11 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #25 0 reviews | #15 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 2 reviews | #21 17 reviews |
| Luxury | #31 2 reviews | #34 2 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #39 0 reviews | #33 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #31 0 reviews | #28 1 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #33 0 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #10 3 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #16 0 reviews | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing between DJUBO and Noovy boils down to your hotel’s specific needs for management, integration, and scale. Both solutions aim to streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. DJUBO offers a more extensive integration network and a broader feature set, while Noovy emphasizes simplicity and affordability.
Your team needs to decide whether comprehensive control or ease and value are more important. Which aligns better with your current priorities?
Both DJUBO and Noovy serve as all-in-one hotel management platforms designed to simplify operations and improve efficiency. DJUBO consolidates PMS, channel management, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and back-office functions under one roof, making it suitable for complex, multi-location operations. Noovy, on the other hand, offers a streamlined experience with core functionalities, focusing on user friendliness and automation.
In terms of recent reviews, DJUBO has more feedback—15 reviews in the last six months—making its data more current and reliable. Noovy has 21 reviews but none in the past six months, which slightly weakens the recency of its feedback. The more recent reviews favor DJUBO’s robustness, but Noovy maintains a high overall satisfaction rating.
Do you prefer a platform with a proven track record of recent updates and more extensive features? Or is a simpler, more affordable system appealing?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, feature-rich system capable of managing multiple locations and complex operations, DJUBO is the clear choice. Its 42 shared and unique features—including guest feedback management and ancillary revenue tracking—support growth and operational control. It’s especially suitable if your hotel values detailed reporting and integration with legacy systems.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes ease of use, quick onboarding, and cost-effective automation, Noovy is better. Its focus on connectivity, automated payments, and user-friendly interface makes it ideal for small to mid-sized hotels, especially those looking for a straightforward, all-in-one solution at €£$5 per room per month.
Which profile fits your hotel’s size, complexity, and budget?
DJUBO boasts a user satisfaction score of 4.95/5, with many reviews highlighting its straightforward interface and easy onboarding process. Users appreciate the consistency of updates and the support team’s availability, making staff adoption smoother. However, some mention that the platform’s aesthetics may seem slightly dated, although an update is underway.
Noovy scores 4.62/5, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive design, quick setup, and seamless operation. Users frequently mention how fast and friendly the support team is, which enhances overall usability. The simplified interface and automation features are especially praised by smaller hotels.
Edge: DJUBO, due to its higher recent ratings and more positive feedback on onboarding.
DJUBO offers 42 core features, with 2 exclusive functionalities like guest feedback management and ancillary revenue tracking. Its comprehensive suite supports complex operations, multi-channel distribution, and detailed reporting, making it suitable for larger or multi-property hotels.
Noovy provides 40 shared features plus 10 unique functionalities, including guest CRM, online checkout, integrated payment terminals, drag-and-drop tapechart, GDPR compliance, and native email marketing. Its features focus on automation, connectivity, and ease of use, benefiting hotels seeking a straightforward solution.
Edge: DJUBO, because of its broader feature set and specialized functionalities tailored for complex operations.
DJUBO’s support ratings stand at 4.76/5, with reviews praising its quick, knowledgeable response and helpful onboarding. Users consistently mention how the support team resolves issues efficiently, improving overall satisfaction.
Noovy’s support scores 4.71/5, with reviewers describing the support as “friendly,” “reliable,” and “very good.” Though fewer recent reviews are available, the consensus remains positive, especially regarding prompt assistance and onboarding.
Edge: DJUBO, which has slightly higher recent support ratings and more detailed reviews.
DJUBO integrates with 3 verified partner systems, including TripAdvisor, Simplotel, and its own booking engine. Its limited integrations may restrict connectivity with some external systems or OTAs.
Noovy’s system boasts 40 verified partners, including Omnibees, SiteMinder, GuestRevu, and others, offering extensive connectivity across multiple OTAs, revenue management, and guest communication platforms. Its wide integration network allows for greater flexibility and scalability.
Edge: Noovy, with 40 verified integrations and broader connectivity options.
DJUBO has a perfect 5/5 rating in the most recent review cycle, with 15 reviews in the last six months, mostly from independent hotels and resorts. Hoteliers appreciate its technical reliability, real-time control, and ongoing upgrades.
Noovy also enjoys a 5/5 rating, but with all reviews being positive and more than half from boutique hotels and city center properties. Its high satisfaction score of 9.38/10 reflects strong user confidence, especially among small to mid-sized hotels.
Considering the recency of reviews, DJUBO’s ratings are more current and thus more indicative of recent performance.
Edge: DJUBO, due to its higher number of recent reviews and superior ratings.
DJUBO does not publish specific pricing details, but traditionally, it operates on a customized quote basis, often suited for larger or multi-property hotels. Its pricing reflects its broad feature set and extensive integrations.
Noovy charges a flat rate of $600 per month, covering all core functionalities, including PMS, channel management, booking engine, and automation tools. Its transparent pricing and affordability make it appealing to budget-conscious hoteliers.
Are you prepared for a potentially variable quote, or do you prefer a fixed, predictable monthly fee?
Hotels that should consider DJUBO:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that should consider Noovy:
Not ideal if:
DJUBO offers a comprehensive management platform with extensive features, integrations, and a proven track record of recent, positive reviews. Its broad functionality makes it suitable for larger or multi-location hotels that need detailed control and operational visibility.
Noovy excels in simplicity, affordability, and connectivity, making it ideal for smaller hotels that want quick setup and automation at a predictable monthly cost. Its user-friendly design is favored by boutique and city-center properties.
Choose DJUBO if your hotel requires complex operations, multiple integrations, and advanced analytics. Opt for Noovy if you want an easy-to-use, cost-effective system with strong OTA connectivity.
If your hotel values recent, detailed reviews and a wider integration network, Noovy’s recent feedback and extensive partner list make it the stronger choice. For hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich platform with proven support, DJUBO delivers more comprehensive capabilities.
In conclusion, both platforms are excellent options depending on your hotel’s size, complexity, and budget. Prioritize what matters most—depth of features or ease of use—and your decision will be clearer.
According to HTR's product database, Djubo and Noovy share 40 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Feedback Management | ||
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Online Checkout |
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
The software's user-friendly interface and ease of training for new employees are frequently mentioned, making it suitable even for those with little... The software's user-friendly interface and ease of training for new employees are frequently mentioned, making it suitable even for those with little technical background.
HotelConnect's direct connectivity with OTAs like Booking.com and Expedia is seen as a major advantage, simplifying distribution and eliminating chann... HotelConnect's direct connectivity with OTAs like Booking.com and Expedia is seen as a major advantage, simplifying distribution and eliminating channel manager costs.
Users appreciate that HotelConnect combines PMS, Channel Manager, Booking Engine, Revenue Management, and Guest Communication into one platform, reduc... Users appreciate that HotelConnect combines PMS, Channel Manager, Booking Engine, Revenue Management, and Guest Communication into one platform, reducing the need for multiple systems and lowering costs.
Where hoteliers push back
Features related to revenue management, including detailed reporting tools and rate calendars, are appreciated for helping optimize hotel revenue.
There are some mentions of translation issues, particularly in languages other than English, causing minor inconveniences.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Djubo and Noovy share many core Hotel Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Djubo offers 3 verified integration partners, while Noovy offers 40. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Djubo leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Djubo: No. Noovy: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. DJUBO has an HT Score of 0 and Noovy has 64. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor