The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,332 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
DOWHAT shines .
SiteMinder shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.3/5) , with exclusive features like Performance Reporting and Mobile optimized/responsive.
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,332 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 1,332 |
After analyzing 1,332 verified reviews, DOWHAT users most value its , while SiteMinder users highlight channel manager capabilities, real-time inventory & rate management, customer support challenges. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Channel Manager Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Inventory & Rate Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support Challenges
▾
|
|
|
+
Overbooking Issues
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Customer Support Challenges
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS and Other Systems
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #45 0 reviews | #1 470 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #45 0 reviews | #1 527 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #39 0 reviews | #1 96 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #30 0 reviews | #1 50 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #46 0 reviews | #1 564 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #42 0 reviews | #1 411 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #42 0 reviews | #1 230 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #36 0 reviews | #1 174 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #42 0 reviews | #2 157 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 266 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #32 0 reviews | #1 418 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #3 13 reviews |
Choosing between Booking Engine by DOWHAT and SiteMinder's Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and strategic priorities. Both aim to streamline reservations and increase direct bookings, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. DOWHAT’s booking engine is a newcomer with no reviews or recent data, while SiteMinder’s platform is well-established, with over 1,200 reviews and recent performance metrics. Given the stark contrast, the decision should lean heavily toward the product with current, robust user feedback.
DOWHAT’s booking engine is very new, with no reviews or recent user feedback to gauge real-world performance, reliability, or support quality. In contrast, SiteMinder’s platform boasts a 4.48/5 overall rating based on over 1,200 reviews, with recent feedback from 72 users in the last six months, reflecting ongoing updates and user satisfaction. SiteMinder’s extensive review base and recent positive feedback make it the more trustworthy choice for today’s hotelier.
Both products aim to optimize online reservations, but SiteMinder offers a comprehensive array of features, integrations, and a global presence that DOWHAT currently cannot match. If your hotel values proven reliability, a mature ecosystem, and extensive support, SiteMinder is the clear leader. Do you want to risk untested technology, or prefer a platform with recent, high-quality feedback confirming its effectiveness?
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich booking engine with proven support, go with SiteMinder. Its large user base and recent reviews underscore its stability, ease of use, and extensive integrations across multiple channels and PMS systems. For hotels looking to expand distribution and improve operational efficiency with a trusted platform, SiteMinder is the safer, more scalable choice.
Conversely, if your team is open to testing new technology and your primary concern is cutting-edge innovation without current user feedback, DOWHAT might be tempting. But given its lack of reviews, support data, or recent updates, it’s a high-risk option. For a decision rooted in confidence and proven performance, SiteMinder is the clear recommendation.
SiteMinder’s interface receives a 4.6/5 ease of use rating, with many users praising its intuitive setup, straightforward navigation, and quick onboarding process. Reviewers highlight its user-friendliness even for staff with limited tech experience, along with clear documentation and support.
DOWHAT’s booking engine, however, has no reviews or ratings available, leaving its usability and onboarding quality completely unverified. While AI descriptions suggest a simple interface, the absence of user feedback makes it impossible to gauge real-world user satisfaction. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s booking engine offers 39 features across various categories, including room & rate filtering, performance reporting, rate intelligence, multi-currency support, PMS connectivity, and automation tools like pre-stay and post-stay emails. These features cater to large and small hotels seeking detailed control and insights.
DOWHAT’s booking engine appears to lack any listed features beyond basic booking functionalities, with no public information on advanced tools or integrations. The feature gap is significant, especially for hotels aiming for sophisticated revenue management or multi-channel distribution. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s customer support scores 4.43/5, with many reviews praising its responsiveness, multilingual support, and helpful onboarding. Notably, clients like Hotel Amicizia and Hotel Graf Bentinck report improved efficiency and fewer manual errors thanks to reliable support.
DOWHAT’s support quality cannot be assessed, as it has no reviews or customer feedback available. The absence of data raises questions about its responsiveness, onboarding, and ongoing assistance. For dependable support, SiteMinder clearly leads. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder provides integrations with over 245 verified partners, including major PMS systems, channel managers, and booking platforms like Oracle Hospitality, Duve, and others. Its open API and extensive partner network enable hotels to connect seamlessly with existing systems and expand distribution.
DOWHAT’s platform has only 2 verified partners, with one shared integration (Oracle Hospitality). The limited connectivity suggests fewer options for expanding or customizing your hotel’s tech ecosystem. For scalability and flexibility, SiteMinder offers the superior integration capability. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s overall rating of 4.48/5 across 1,207 reviews makes it the most highly-rated choice. Recent reviews emphasize its stability, ease of use, and ability to increase direct bookings, especially among boutique, city center, and resort hotels.
DOWHAT has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Without recent, verified feedback, hoteliers should favor SiteMinder’s proven track record. Edge: SiteMinder.
DOWHAT’s pricing details are unavailable, indicating either a lack of transparent pricing or a nascent product. This obscurity complicates value assessment and budget planning.
SiteMinder charges a base fee of $500 monthly, with no additional implementation or per-room fees. This predictable structure allows hotels to budget effectively. Given the lack of transparent pricing for DOWHAT, SiteMinder offers clearer value for investment.
Hotels that are experimental, early adopters, or operating on very tight budgets might consider DOWHAT, especially if they want to test new technology without significant upfront costs. It could be suitable for small, independent hotels or vacation rentals looking for basic booking capabilities.
Not ideal if your hotel requires robust features, reliable support, or integration with multiple channels. Larger, revenue-focused hotels that depend on proven technology should avoid DOWHAT until it demonstrates stability and feature maturity through user feedback.
Hotels seeking a proven, scalable, and feature-rich booking engine should choose SiteMinder. It is ideal for independent boutique hotels, resorts, and city hotels that need extensive distribution control, detailed analytics, and seamless PMS integration.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very tight budget or requires a simple booking system without extensive features. Small properties with minimal distribution needs or those preferring a DIY approach might find SiteMinder’s cost and complexity overwhelming.
The core difference between the two products is maturity and proven performance. SiteMinder’s booking engine has a long track record, extensive features, and highly positive recent reviews, making it the more dependable choice today.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich system with global distribution, robust support, and proven scalability, choose SiteMinder. Its extensive integrations and customer satisfaction ratings make it a particularly strong candidate for most mid-sized and larger hotels.
However, if you are willing to take a risk on an untested platform, and your priorities are experimentation or niche use cases, DOWHAT’s offering might be worth exploring—though it’s important to note the current lack of evidence supporting its performance.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming for stability, growth, and confidence in their online booking operations, SiteMinder’s booking engine stands out as the smarter, more secure investment today.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Booking Engine by DOWHAT and SiteMinder Booking Engine share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Open API | ||
| Performance Reporting | ||
| Quick rate shopping filters | ||
| Rate Intelligence | ||
| Room & rate type filtering | ||
| Room Rate Comparison |
Showing top differences. 27 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As mentioned by Jacqueline, efficiency is key in the daily runnings of a property. The fast-paced nature of hospitality means that when guests have a problem, it needs to be solved..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The team understood our needs, and tweaked the interface to optimise performance accordingly."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We are a transformative business in the Southeast Asian market, in that guests can easily book stays of a varied length and be confident in the consistency of their experience. Thi..."
What hoteliers love
The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory syn... The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory synchronized. It is particularly recognized for its stability in providing real-time updates and minimizing manual interventions.
SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings a... SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings and ensures accuracy in distribution. Users appreciate the seamless and efficient synchronization with various OTAs, even during high demand periods.
While the platform is efficient, a few users expressed concerns about slow customer support response times, which can be particularly problematic duri... While the platform is efficient, a few users expressed concerns about slow customer support response times, which can be particularly problematic during peak periods. Faster and more responsive support is highlighted as an area for improvement.
Where hoteliers push back
Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individua... Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individual hotel branding. Including more flexible design elements could aid in differentiating a hotel's direct booking experience from OTAs.
While the platform is efficient, a few users expressed concerns about slow customer support response times, which can be particularly problematic duri... While the platform is efficient, a few users expressed concerns about slow customer support response times, which can be particularly problematic during peak periods. Faster and more responsive support is highlighted as an area for improvement.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Booking Engine by DOWHAT and SiteMinder Booking Engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Booking Engine by DOWHAT offers 2 verified integration partners, while SiteMinder Booking Engine offers 245. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SiteMinder Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Booking Engine by DOWHAT: No. SiteMinder Booking Engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. DOWHAT has an HT Score of 0 and SiteMinder has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor