The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 42 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
e-Guma shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.3/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile Friendly and Guest History.
Side-by-side ratings based on 42 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 42 |
After analyzing 42 verified reviews, e-Guma users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight user interface and usability, reporting and dashboard, aggregating feedback. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| e-Guma |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Dashboard
▾
|
|
|
+
Aggregating Feedback
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Software
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Response Time for Reviews
▾
|
|
|
−
Price vs. Value
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Reputation Management vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | e-Guma |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #19 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #9 16 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | e-Guma |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #7 13 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #7 18 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #7 12 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #13 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | e-Guma |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #9 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 15 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #5 6 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #3 9 reviews |
Choosing a reputation management platform for your hotel means evaluating how well the solution consolidates guest feedback, offers actionable insights, and integrates into your existing operations. e-Guma and Shiji Reviewpro Reputation aim to solve these challenges but diverge significantly in their offerings, customer feedback, and global reach. Given the available data, which product truly supports your hotel’s reputation strategy?
Both e-Guma and Shiji Reviewpro Reputation are designed to help you monitor and manage your online reputation. e-Guma, however, shows no reviews or recent customer feedback, making it impossible to gauge its current effectiveness. Meanwhile, Shiji Reviewpro Reputation boasts over 40 reviews in the last six months, with an overall rating of 3.83 out of 5 and a 81% likelihood to recommend, giving you stronger confidence in its performance.
While e-Guma claims to be a reputation management tool, the lack of reviews or demonstrated market presence suggests it is either new or lacks user traction. Conversely, Shiji Reviewpro Reputation’s extensive reviews and positive recent ratings indicate consistent performance and ongoing customer satisfaction. Are you willing to base your decision on an unverified platform, or do recent, detailed customer insights sway your choice?
If your hotel needs a mature, well-supported reputation management platform with extensive integrations, go with Shiji Reviewpro Reputation. Its 64 verified partners, including industry giants like TripAdvisor, Booking.com, and Google, offer seamless connectivity that can streamline your review collection and response workflows.
If your hotel is smaller or looking for a potentially less expensive or simpler alternative, you might consider e-Guma—though, without reviews or features data, this is a risky choice. For hotels prioritizing reliability and proven results, Shiji Reviewpro Reputation remains the safer, more established option.
Shiji Reviewpro Reputation scores 4.15 out of 5 for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive dashboard and straightforward setup. Users highlight that its user interface is accessible, requiring minimal onboarding effort, and that staff adoption is smooth.
In contrast, e-Guma has a 0/5 usability rating, with no available reviews to assess its interface or onboarding experience. The absence of user feedback suggests uncertainty around its usability and implementation. Edge: Shiji Reviewpro Reputation.
Shiji Reviewpro Reputation offers an impressive 43 features, including guest history, photo sharing, AI-generated reply automation, sentiment analysis, in-stay surveys, and competitive benchmarking. These functionalities support comprehensive review collection, analysis, and response, helping you act on guest feedback proactively.
e-Guma provides no feature data or unique capabilities, making it impossible to evaluate its offering. Given the extensive feature set of Reviewpro and the absence of comparable information from e-Guma, the clear edge goes to Shiji Reviewpro Reputation.
Shiji Reviewpro Reputation’s customer support scores 3.69 out of 5, with reviews revealing a mixed experience. Some users appreciate timely assistance and professional staff, while others report slow responses and inconsistent support quality.
e-Guma has no reviews or support ratings available. With no customer feedback to evaluate, it’s impossible to judge its support quality. Given the evidence, Reviewpro’s support, despite some flaws, appears more reliable. Edge: Shiji Reviewpro Reputation.
Shiji Reviewpro boasts 64 verified integrations, including popular PMS, RMS, and distribution platforms like SiteMinder, Revinate, and Amadeus. This extensive connectivity allows you to gather reviews from over 140 sites and streamline your reputation workflows.
e-Guma offers no verified integrations, greatly limiting its utility in a multi-platform environment. For hotels seeking a platform with broad connectivity, Reviewpro’s integration network is the clear winner. Edge: Shiji Reviewpro Reputation.
Since e-Guma has no reviews or scores, it cannot be rated by hoteliers. Shiji Reviewpro Reputation, with its 40 reviews, scores an overall 3.83 out of 5, and an 81% likelihood to recommend, indicating a generally positive reception.
Segment-specific ratings show that independent hotels rate it at 4.33/5, and branded hotels at 4.29/5, reflecting broad acceptance across property types. Given the current review data, Reviewpro’s user satisfaction is significantly higher than any unverified platform could claim. Edge: Shiji Reviewpro Reputation.
e-Guma’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears to lack a trial or clear billing structure. Conversely, Shiji Reviewpro Reputation costs $900 per month, with no mention of discounts or flexible pricing, which might be steep for some hotels but provides a clear ongoing cost.
If budget is a concern, the lack of transparent pricing from e-Guma complicates a cost comparison. For predictable, albeit higher, investment, Reviewpro’s pricing offers clarity and consistent value. Edge: Shiji Reviewpro Reputation.
Hotels that want to trial a new reputation management platform without committing upfront.
Smaller hotels or boutique properties seeking basic review tracking.
Hotels with limited technical resources or those in regions where e-Guma has a presence.
Teams that prefer a simple, no-frills solution and are willing to test unproven vendors.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a platform with extensive features, proven results, and global support.
Not suitable if your team relies on integrations with major third-party software.
Not recommended if you prioritize detailed analytics, sentiment analysis, or competitive benchmarking.
Hotels looking for a well-supported, established reputation platform should look elsewhere.
Hotels seeking a mature, feature-rich reputation management system with broad integrations.
Properties in regions covered by Shiji’s global presence, especially in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
Hotels that value detailed guest feedback analysis, sentiment insights, and operational benchmarking.
Teams aiming to improve guest satisfaction, Ratings, and revenue through proactive review responses.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in a region where Shiji’s support is limited.
Not suitable for hotels that prefer very low-cost or minimal solutions.
Not recommended if your hotel has very simple reputation needs or lacks the bandwidth to utilize advanced features.
Smaller properties or those new to reputation management might find the platform overly complex.
The core difference is that Shiji Reviewpro Reputation is an established, feature-rich platform backed by extensive reviews and global presence, making it a reliable choice for hotels looking to actively manage their online reputation. e-Guma, with no reviews, features, or recent customer feedback, is unproven and risky.
If your hotel needs a proven, comprehensive reputation management system with broad integrations, go with Reviewpro. Its extensive features, positive recent reviews, and global reach make it a clear winner for established hotels seeking operational improvements.
Choose e-Guma only if you are willing to take a chance on an unverified solution, perhaps for a trial phase or in a very specific local market where it might be emerging. For most hotels, especially those prioritizing reliability and support, Reviewpro remains the obvious choice.
This comparison aims to provide you with a clear, data-backed understanding of which platform best fits your hotel’s reputation management needs.
Reputation Management pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| e-Guma |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, e- Guma and Shiji Reviewpro Reputation share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | e-Guma |
|
|---|---|---|
| Facebook Messenger Integration | ||
| Guest History | ||
| Mobile Friendly | ||
| Photo Sharing | ||
| SMS text messaging | ||
| Secured Data Protection |
Showing top differences. 31 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Our Guest Experience Specialist no longer spends valuable time manually monitoring and responding to feedback across multiple platforms."
What hoteliers love
The tool’s user interface is generally lauded for its simplicity and intuitiveness. Users find it easy to navigate and appreciate that it requires min... The tool’s user interface is generally lauded for its simplicity and intuitiveness. Users find it easy to navigate and appreciate that it requires minimal configuration, making it accessible for various team members.
Many users highlight the user-friendly nature of ReviewPro's dashboard, praising its comprehensiveness and ease of use. The dashboards offer valuable... Many users highlight the user-friendly nature of ReviewPro's dashboard, praising its comprehensiveness and ease of use. The dashboards offer valuable insights and facilitate the tracking of key performance indicators (KPIs), which aids in better decision-making.
Users appreciate ReviewPro's ability to gather guest feedback from multiple platforms and social media channels. This aggregation helps them maintain... Users appreciate ReviewPro's ability to gather guest feedback from multiple platforms and social media channels. This aggregation helps them maintain an up-to-date understanding of their online reputation and facilitates effective operations management. The tool's integration and synchronization capabilities enhance its utility.
Where hoteliers push back
ReviewPro's customer support quality is a mixed bag. While some users appreciate the swift responses and proactive feature updates, others have noted... ReviewPro's customer support quality is a mixed bag. While some users appreciate the swift responses and proactive feature updates, others have noted rudeness and lack of timely support as significant issues.
Multiple reviews mention delays in the system's processing and displaying of responses to guest reviews. This lag can disrupt workflow and delay criti... Multiple reviews mention delays in the system's processing and displaying of responses to guest reviews. This lag can disrupt workflow and delay critical review management actions.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. e- Guma and Shiji Reviewpro Reputation share many core Reputation Management features, but each has unique capabilities. e- Guma offers 0 verified integration partners, while Shiji Reviewpro Reputation offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Reviewpro Reputation leads in ease of use at 4.2/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
e- Guma: No. Shiji Reviewpro Reputation: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Reputation Management vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. e-Guma has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 32. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor