The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 889 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
e4jconnect shines in ease of use and customer support .
Mews shines when it comes to ease of use — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 889 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 2 | 887 |
After analyzing 889 verified reviews, e4jconnect users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #45 1 reviews | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #71 0 reviews | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #43 1 reviews | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing between e4jconnect (VikBooking) and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline property management; however, they diverge significantly in scale, user experience, features, and market presence. Mews, with its extensive reviews and recent positive feedback, clearly leads in data currency and user confidence. So, which system aligns best with your hotel’s growth trajectory?
e4jconnect offers a straightforward property management experience, particularly for small to mid-sized properties, with a focus on automation of bookings and channel management. Mews, on the other hand, provides a broad suite of features optimized for a range of hotel types, from boutique to large chains, and boasts a significantly larger user base and recent review activity. Do you need a simple, cost-effective solution or a comprehensive platform for expansion?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich system capable of supporting multi-property operations and advanced integrations, go with Mews. If your priority is a budget-friendly, easy-to-set-up PMS primarily for small properties or vacation rentals, e4jconnect might suffice. For most hoteliers, Mews' proven track record and recent reviews make it the stronger choice, especially for growth-oriented properties.
e4jconnect scores a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, with a very user-friendly backend praised for its simplicity and support. Mews, rated at 4.7/5, offers an intuitive, modern interface with consistent praise for onboarding and staff adoption. However, Mews’ advanced features can require a learning curve. Edge: e4jconnect.
Mews offers 31 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online checkout, and a mobile housekeeping app—functions e4jconnect does not provide. e4jconnect’s core features focus on booking synchronization and basic management. The edge goes to Mews for its vast feature set and adaptability.
Both products boast high support ratings, but e4jconnect’s reviews highlight unbeatable, personalized support with a 5/5 rating. Mews’ customer support, rated at 4.27/5, is responsive but occasionally criticized for bugs, though issues are quickly addressed. Edge: e4jconnect.
Mews offers 336 verified integrations, including popular channel managers, payment providers, and revenue tools, vastly outpacing e4jconnect’s single verified partner. This extensive ecosystem empowers hotels to customize their tech environment easily. Edge: Mews.
Mews enjoys a 4.64/5 rating from 679 reviews, predominantly from boutique and independent properties, with recent reviews praising its scalability and support. e4jconnect’s reviews are scarce, with only two reviews and a 0/5 rating, indicating limited recent confidence. The clear winner: Mews.
e4jconnect charges a flat $100 monthly fee with no additional implementation or trial costs. Mews, by comparison, starts at $900/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-level capabilities. Budget considerations favor e4jconnect, but value for features and scale leans toward Mews.
Mews offers a versatile, well-supported system with a rich feature set, large user base, and recent reviews confirming its ongoing innovation. It’s an excellent choice for hotels looking to grow, streamline operations, and enhance guest experiences through technology.
e4jconnect, with its straightforward setup and lower cost, remains suitable for small properties or those with very limited operational needs. However, its limited review presence and feature scope make it less appealing for expanding or multi-property hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes modern features, robust integrations, and proven scalability, Mews is the clear winner. For smaller, budget-conscious properties, e4jconnect can still deliver effective management, but it lacks the depth of Mews’ offerings.
In conclusion, for properties seeking a future-proof, comprehensive PMS with active support and recent positive feedback, Mews is the recommended choice.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System and Mews PMS share 28 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 19 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System offers 1 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. e4jconnect has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor