The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 83 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Enzo shines .
straiv shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
Side-by-side ratings based on 83 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 83 |
After analyzing 83 verified reviews, Enzo users most value its , while straiv users highlight digital check-in and check-out, guest communication and customization, ease of implementation and use. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Digital check-in and check-out
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest communication and customization
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of implementation and use
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous improvement and updates
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Payment process issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 27 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 41 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 8 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #5 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 28 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #4 18 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #16 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 79 reviews |
When evaluating contactless check-in solutions, your hotel aims for a system that's reliable, user-friendly, and well-supported. Enzo by Enzo offers a CRM-centric platform, but with no recent reviews or user feedback, it's difficult to gauge its current performance. Straiv by straiv, on the other hand, boasts over 80 recent reviews with an average rating of 4.81 out of 5, making it a more trustworthy choice for hoteliers seeking a proven track record. Given this, which product truly meets your needs?
Both products address the core challenge of minimizing contact during check-in, but their approaches differ. Enzo’s focus appears rooted in customer data management and AI-driven insights, though its lack of recent feedback raises questions about ongoing support and feature updates. Straiv emphasizes streamlining the guest journey with digital check-in, messaging, and integrations, backed by recent, positive reviews. Do you prioritize a platform with a proven, recent reputation or one that emphasizes data-driven customer relationship management?
If your hotel primarily needs a contactless check-in system integrated into a broader CRM for customer insights, Enzo might seem appealing. However, since Enzo has no current reviews or active user ratings, it’s hard to verify its performance or support quality today. Conversely, straiv, with 81 recent reviews and a 4.81/5 rating, provides a robust suite of features like online check-in, messaging, and PMS integration, making it a more reliable option. If your hotel values a tested, highly-rated platform, straiv is the clear choice.
For boutique hotels and properties emphasizing guest experience alongside operational efficiency, straiv’s features such as digital concierge and upselling modules are practical. On the other hand, if your hotel relies heavily on customer data analysis and targeted marketing, Enzo’s CRM capabilities could be attractive—though the absence of recent user feedback makes its current effectiveness uncertain. Given the recent review data, which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Straiv receives high marks for ease of use, with a 4.69 out of 5 rating and consistent praise for its intuitive interface, simple implementation, and user-friendly guest journey. Its onboarding process is rated 4.62 out of 5, and users report that staff and guests find the platform straightforward, with minimal training needed. Enzo, however, has no available recent reviews or usability scores, which makes assessing its user friendliness impossible.
Straiv’s comprehensive user feedback indicates that both staff and guests adapt quickly, and the platform’s design minimizes technical barriers. Since Enzo has no recent data or reviews, it’s impossible to confidently compare its ease of use. Therefore, edge: straiv.
Straiv offers 19 unique features centered on contactless check-in, including mobile check-in/out, guest messaging, digital concierge, room service, PMS integration, device agnosticism, and ID verification. These features directly enhance guest experience and operational efficiency. Enzo, by contrast, only offers a simple contactless check-in solution with no additional features listed, and no data suggests it provides advanced features like payments or room service.
Straiv’s extensive feature set is ideal if your hotel seeks a comprehensive digital guest journey. Enzo’s limited functionality makes it less suitable for properties aiming for a full-service digital solution. Given the feature count, which platform aligns with your operational ambitions?
Straiv’s support and onboarding ratings both sit above 4.7 out of 5, with numerous reviews praising its quick, professional responses and proactive development team. Hoteliers appreciate the ongoing updates and the dedicated support, which contributes to a smooth implementation process. Enzo’s ratings and reviews are unavailable, making it impossible to gauge its support quality today.
Based on recent feedback, straiv’s support team is responsive and effective, which is critical during onboarding and troubleshooting. Without evidence of Enzo’s current support quality, edge: straiv.
Straiv integrates with 36 verified partners, including popular PMS and access control systems like Oracle Hospitality, SALTO, and Cloudbeds. Its extensive partner network supports seamless data transfer and automation. Enzo, with only 3 verified partners including Mews and Duve, offers limited integration options, potentially restricting its ability to connect with existing hotel systems.
For hotels seeking a flexible, integrable platform that works well with existing technology stacks, straiv’s network is a significant advantage. Given the limited integrations available with Enzo, edge: straiv.
Straiv’s overall rating of 4.81/5 from 81 recent reviews indicates high user satisfaction, especially among boutique and city-center hotels. Its recent reviews emphasize ease of use, support quality, and feature richness. Enzo, with no current reviews or ratings, provides no recent user feedback to support its efficacy or support quality.
Since recent reviews are more reliable indicators of current performance, straiv is clearly favored. Its high ratings across multiple categories reinforce its position as the preferred choice. Edge: straiv.
Enzo’s pricing information is not publicly available, and it appears to operate on a bespoke or enterprise model, possibly with no trial options. Straiv charges a base price of $500 per month, with no mention of additional implementation fees or per-room charges, implying a straightforward subscription model.
This transparent pricing makes it easier to evaluate ROI with straiv. Without clear pricing details for Enzo, it’s difficult to compare cost-effectiveness directly. Given the available data, edge: straiv.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a ready-made, feature-rich contactless check-in system or seamless PMS integration without extensive customization.
Not ideal if your hotel does not require extensive digital engagement or if your property prefers a CRM-focused platform over contactless check-in features.
Straiv stands out due to its extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and feature-rich platform. Its strong support, proven integrations, and ease of use make it a dependable choice for most hotels seeking contactless check-in and digital guest engagement today.
Enzo, in contrast, lacks recent data, reviews, and detailed features, making it a risky choice unless your hotel specifically needs a CRM system and is prepared to evaluate its current performance independently. For hotels prioritizing proven, well-supported digital check-in solutions, straiv is the clear winner.
In conclusion, if you want a contactless check-in platform with recent proven performance, features, and support, straiv is the better choice. Enzo may appeal if your focus lies in customer data management, but the absence of recent validation makes it less suitable for now.
Note: This comparison is based on the latest available reviews and data. Always verify current platform features and support levels before making a final decision.
According to HTR's product database, Enzo and straiv share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Local Recommendations | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Mobile Checkout | ||
| Room Service Ordering | ||
| Web-app |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Digital check-in and check-out are praised for significantly reducing waiting times for guests and administrative burdens for staff. Reviews emphasize... Digital check-in and check-out are praised for significantly reducing waiting times for guests and administrative burdens for staff. Reviews emphasize the benefits of contactless processes, especially during the COVID-19 era, providing guests with seamless and flexible arrivals and departures, while ensuring compliance with health safety protocols.
Users appreciate the ability to communicate directly with guests through journey mailing and other customizable modules. This facilitates timely infor... Users appreciate the ability to communicate directly with guests through journey mailing and other customizable modules. This facilitates timely information exchange, promotional offers, and enhances overall guest satisfaction. Reviews laud the flexibility in designing guest interactions based on individual hotel needs.
Straiv receives high marks for the ease with which its system can be implemented, requiring no advanced IT skills. Reviews consistently mention the to... Straiv receives high marks for the ease with which its system can be implemented, requiring no advanced IT skills. Reviews consistently mention the tool's intuitive user interface, making it easy for both staff and guests to interact with the system.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users report issues with the payment processing feature, such as delays and incomplete data transfers. Improvements in integrating multiple payme... Some users report issues with the payment processing feature, such as delays and incomplete data transfers. Improvements in integrating multiple payment gateways are suggested to enhance efficiency and reliability.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Enzo and straiv share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. Enzo offers 3 verified integration partners, while straiv offers 37. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. straiv leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Enzo: No. straiv: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Enzo has an HT Score of 0 and straiv has 73. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor