The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
REPAY shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, REPAY users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| REPAY |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | REPAY |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | REPAY |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | REPAY |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing the right payments processing software can dramatically impact your hotel's cash flow, operational efficiency, and guest experience. Both ePay by REPAY and Zil Money aim to streamline your payment operations, but their features, support, and market presence differ significantly. While REPAY has a minimal online footprint and no recent reviews, Zil Money offers a broader feature set, more recent feedback, and a stronger market presence. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
ePay by REPAY is designed as a straightforward electronic payment processing platform. It handles basic credit and ACH payments but lacks recent reviews, active user feedback, or notable feature updates, making its value and reliability difficult to assess. Conversely, Zil Money boasts 54 recent reviews and an active user base across multiple continents, reflecting ongoing development and customer engagement.
Both platforms aim to facilitate financial transactions but diverge sharply in their scope and usability. ePay is limited to core payment processing, while Zil Money offers a suite of features like pay-by-link, multi-currency settlements, and contactless payments. The question becomes: do you need a simple payment gateway, or a comprehensive financial management tool?
If your hotel requires a flexible, feature-rich platform capable of handling complex payment workflows, Zil Money is the clear choice. It supports various payment methods, including Apple Pay, Google Pay, Paypal, and American Express, offering a rich feature set with 15 unique functionalities that ePay does not provide.
On the other hand, if your priority is a simple, streamlined payment processing system with minimal setup and management, ePay might seem appealing—though the lack of recent reviews and visible user feedback makes this option risky. Given the current market evidence, Zil Money's established presence and comprehensive features make it the more reliable choice for hotels seeking operational control and scalability.
Ease of use is a critical factor, especially in busy hotel environments where staff need quick, reliable tools. Zil Money scores an impressive 4.5/5 for ease of use based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward payment workflows. Conversely, REPAY scores 0/5 with no recent reviews or user ratings, making its usability assessment impossible and implying it might lack recent user-centric updates.
Most recent feedback indicates Zil Money's interface reduces onboarding time and improves staff adoption, whereas REPAY’s absence of recent reviews suggests limited ongoing support or updates.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money offers 15 features, including pay-by-link, recurring payments, multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, and payment splitting—features that significantly expand your hotel’s payment options and operational control. ePay, in contrast, provides no unique features or advanced functionalities, limiting you to basic payment processing.
For hotels seeking a versatile, multi-channel payment platform capable of handling diverse transactions and currencies, Zil Money’s feature set is essential. ePay’s feature offerings are too limited to support complex or multi-method payment workflows.
Edge: Zil Money.
Customer support quality often correlates with user satisfaction and operational uptime. Zil Money has a 4.5/5 support rating from recent reviews, with users describing its support team as responsive and helpful, though some note room for faster responses. ePay’s support ratings and recent feedback are nonexistent, and no reviews are available to gauge its support quality.
Given the active review presence for Zil Money, it's the safer bet for responsive, ongoing support—especially important when integrating with your existing hotel systems or resolving urgent issues.
Edge: Zil Money.
With no recent reviews or ratings, ePay's user satisfaction remains entirely unknown, making it impossible to judge. Zil Money, on the other hand, has an 8.57/5 NPS score based on 54 reviews, with 87% of users recommending it. Hotels across segments, including luxury, boutique, and branded hotels, rate Zil Money highly for usability, features, and support.
This robust, recent feedback underscores Zil Money’s standing as a trusted option among hoteliers, whereas REPAY’s lack of recent reviews suggests limited current relevance.
Edge: Zil Money.
ePay’s pricing details are unavailable or not publicly disclosed, which could pose budgeting issues. Zil Money charges a base fee of $400, with no free tier or trial, but provides a transparent cost structure and an API for integration.
While upfront costs may seem high for Zil Money, its feature set and ongoing support justify the investment, especially compared to the opaque pricing of ePay.
Not ideal if:
Given the lack of recent data, ePay is only suitable if your operational needs are minimal and stability is less critical.
Not ideal if:
Zil Money is suited for hotels aiming to modernize their payment operations with a comprehensive, user-reviewed platform.
The core difference lies in scope: ePay is a basic payment processor with no recent reviews or feature updates, making it a risky choice for modern hotel operations. Zil Money offers a well-rounded suite of features, active support, recent feedback, and a solid user base, making it more suitable for hotels that want reliable, multi-channel payment capabilities.
If your hotel needs an all-in-one financial management platform, Zil Money’s extensive features and recent positive reviews make it the clear choice. Conversely, if you just need a simple gateway for very basic transactions, and your budget is constrained, ePay could suffice—though its lack of current user data suggests caution.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming for operational growth and customer satisfaction, Zil Money is the safer, more dependable option.
According to HTR's product database, ePay and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | REPAY |
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ePay and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. ePay offers 0 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ePay: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. REPAY has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor