The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Erisoft shines .
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 887 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Erisoft users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Erisoft |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Erisoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Erisoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Erisoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's success in an increasingly competitive market. Both Ericsoft by Erisoft and Mews PMS aim to streamline operations, but they differ significantly in maturity, feature set, and market presence. While Erisoft claims to be comprehensive, its lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it’s either not actively supported or not trusted by users. Mews, by contrast, has a robust global presence, a vast user base, and recent high ratings. Do you want a system that’s actively proven and trusted?
Both products address core hotel management needs—reservations, front desk, invoicing—but Mews offers a more modern approach with extensive integrations and automation. Ericsoft’s review silence and zero ratings indicate it’s unlikely to meet the demands of today’s hotel operations. So, are you prepared to rely on a platform with no recent feedback, or do you prefer a solution with proven, recent user satisfaction?
Ericsoft’s lack of reviews and a score of 0/5 across all categories make it impossible to assess its real-world performance or support quality. Mews, with over 750 reviews and a 4.62/5 overall rating, provides a wealth of recent feedback, confirming its reliability and customer approval. Hoteliers value Mews’ ease of use, support, and extensive feature set, which are documented by numerous recent positive reviews. Would you rather trust a platform with no evidence of customer satisfaction or one that’s actively rated by hundreds of hotels?
Ericsoft’s absence of recent reviews signifies no recent updates, support, or user validation—an unappealing prospect when operational efficiency is at stake. Mews’s recent reviews highlight improvements in onboarding, support, and feature updates, supporting scalable growth. Given the current hotel tech landscape, do you want to depend on a system with no recent user data or one with a thriving, validated ecosystem?
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable PMS with proven support, automation, and integrations, go with Mews. Its extensive marketplace, cloud-based architecture, and high review volume demonstrate ongoing innovation and user satisfaction. If, however, your hotel is small, local, and highly specific—perhaps with minimal operational complexity—Ericsoft might seem appealing, but the lack of recent reviews makes this hard to verify.
For hotels that prioritize modern guest experiences, seamless integrations, and staff efficiency, Mews’s features like online check-in, contactless payments, and real-time reporting are unmatched. Conversely, Ericsoft’s limited information and zero recent feedback make it difficult to justify investing without clearer evidence of its capabilities or support. Are you comfortable choosing a platform with no recent validation? Or do you prefer a trusted leader?
Mews’s 4.7/5 rating for ease of use and nearly 100 recent reviews indicate a highly intuitive platform. Hotels praise its modern, user-friendly interface and straightforward onboarding, with many reviewers mentioning how quickly staff adapt and see benefits. On the other hand, Ericsoft has no reviews, ratings, or recent data, making it impossible to evaluate its user experience.
Support for staff adoption and operational integration is critical; Mews’s recent positive feedback confirms it’s easy to learn and use daily. Would you want to risk a system with no current user feedback, or opt for one that’s proven to be accessible and well-supported? Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online booking engine, guest CRM, automation tools, and integrations with over 336 partners. It covers most operational needs for modern hotels and offers advanced modules like guest messaging, digital registration, and automated revenue optimization.
Ericsoft, by contrast, claims to be comprehensive but has no documented features or recent updates, raising doubts about its capabilities and relevance. Without a proven feature set or recent development, Ericsoft cannot compete with the depth and breadth of Mews. When considering features that matter, Mews’s extensive ecosystem and modules are clear winners. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews highlight its support team’s responsiveness and helpfulness, with a 4.27/5 support rating. Hotels appreciate how support addresses issues promptly, often resolving bugs and onboarding challenges quickly. Reviewers mention that Mews’s onboarding process is smooth and their support team is proactive.
Ericsoft has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge support quality. A lack of feedback suggests limited or no active support, which can be risky when troubleshooting or onboarding. For reliable, ongoing assistance, Mews’s recent support satisfaction clearly outperforms the unknown status of Ericsoft. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including extensive third-party partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its open API and marketplace enable hotels to customize their tech ecosystem, supporting dynamic pricing, channel management, and guest engagement tools.
Ericsoft’s zero verified integrations severely limit its ability to connect with other hotel systems or third-party tools. Without integrations, your hotel risks siloed operations, manual work, and reduced flexibility. In the modern hotel environment, connectivity is king—Mews’s extensive marketplace outperforms Ericsoft’s unverified, likely limited, connectivity. Edge: Mews.
Mews enjoys over 750 reviews with a 4.62/5 score and recent feedback from nearly 100 hotels. Hoteliers across segments like boutique, city center, and independent hotels consistently praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Ericsoft has no reviews or scores, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Its lack of recent validation suggests it’s either not actively used or supported, reducing its credibility. Given current hotel technology standards, Mews’s high and recent ratings make it the clear choice. Edge: Mews.
Ericsoft’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears to lack a free trial or clear subscription structure. Mews charges a base price of $900/month, with no free tier or trial, but its pricing aligns with many cloud-based PMS offerings.
The absence of transparent pricing for Ericsoft complicates budgeting and decision-making, especially given the lack of recent reviews. Mews’s clear pricing, combined with its proven value and recent customer satisfaction, provides better clarity and confidence. Are you comfortable with unclear costs? Or do you prefer transparent, validated pricing?
Given the lack of recent validation, Ericsoft is best suited for very small operations or experimental use cases where proven support and features are less critical.
Mews’s broad feature set and extensive support make it suitable for a wide range of hotel types, especially those seeking growth and operational efficiency.
Mews and Ericsoft target different hotel segments and maturity levels. Mews is a cloud-native, feature-rich, well-supported platform trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide. Ericsoft remains an unverified, unreviewed option with no recent validation, making it a risky choice for modern hotels.
If your hotel values automation, integrations, scalability, and recent positive reviews, Mews is the clear winner. Its extensive ecosystem and proven performance make it the safer, smarter investment for hotels aiming for operational excellence and guest satisfaction.
Choose Mews if you want a system with validated user success, ongoing innovation, and a global support network. Consider Ericsoft only if you operate a very small, niche property willing to risk unverified support and capabilities—though, in today’s hospitality landscape, that’s rarely advisable.
According to HTR's product database, Ericsoft and Mews PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Erisoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 47 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Ericsoft and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Ericsoft offers 0 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 335. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Ericsoft: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Erisoft has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor