The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 208 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eviivo shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Vacation Rentals & Villas properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Flyhotel shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 208 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 208 | 0 |
After analyzing 208 verified reviews, eviivo users most value its responsive customer support, onboarding expertise, technical efficiency, while Flyhotel users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Responsive Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding Expertise
▾
|
|
|
+
Technical Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking and Reservation Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Improvement Suggestions
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Feature Development
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #15 54 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #23 23 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #20 8 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #18 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #19 41 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #16 38 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #19 21 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #10 18 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #15 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #6 142 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #33 2 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #29 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ PMS and Flyhotel hinges on what your hotel needs most. eviivo offers a comprehensive, well-rated platform with a proven track record, especially in the UK and Europe, while Flyhotel appears less established and lacks user reviews, making its effectiveness harder to verify. Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but only eviivo’s recent review data solidifies its position as the more trustworthy choice. Are you ready to dive into the details?
eviivo Suite™ stands out with nearly 200 reviews, a high average rating of 4.43/5 for ease of use, and recent positive feedback from users managing a variety of property types. Its platform is built to handle multiple channels, guest communication, and operational management, which is why it’s trusted by over 28,000 accommodations worldwide.
Flyhotel, on the other hand, has no publicly available reviews or recent user feedback, and its overall rating is zero, making it impossible to assess its real-world performance. Without recent reviews or validation from hotel operators, its ability to meet your needs remains uncertain.
Given the clear evidence supporting eviivo’s efficacy, is it worth risking your investment on an unreviewed system?
Edge: eviivo.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich platform with strong user feedback, go with eviivo. It suits independent hotels, B&Bs, vacation rentals, and mixed-property portfolios looking for reliable booking, guest management, and multi-channel distribution.
If you primarily operate a small, straightforward property and are willing to accept the risk of limited information, Flyhotel might seem appealing—though its lack of reviews makes it hard to justify. eviivo’s large review base and recent feedback make it the safer choice for most hoteliers looking for proven results.
In essence, if your goal is operational efficiency with a trusted brand, eviivo is the clear winner.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s ease of use is rated at 4.43/5, with a well-regarded onboarding process and a mobile app praised for its convenience—“The app is a godsend,” says a recent user review. Its interface, though occasionally called “convoluted,” is generally considered manageable and supported by extensive customer support.
Flyhotel offers no ratings or user feedback, making it impossible to gauge its usability. Its lack of reviews suggests no available data on onboarding, user interface, or staff adoption.
Given that eviivo’s recent reviews highlight ease of use and support, edge: eviivo.
eviivo boasts 51 unique features, including a channel manager, revenue management, guest CRM, automated messaging, online check-in, and integrated payment processing. These features address a broad range of hotel operational needs, from reservations to guest communication to financial management.
Flyhotel provides no detailed feature list or comparable functionalities, leaving its capabilities unknown. Without concrete data, it’s impossible to assess whether it can meet your hotel’s operational demands.
Thus, in terms of features, eviivo clearly leads.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s customer support scores 4.42/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness—“Support staff like Xavier and Joseph provide exemplary assistance,” says a recent user. Its onboarding process is also rated at 4.38/5, further emphasizing its dedication to client success.
Flyhotel has no reviews or ratings regarding customer support, support quality, or onboarding experience, making it impossible to compare. The absence of feedback suggests a lack of proven support quality.
Given the critical role support plays in hotel management, eviivo’s recent high ratings give it an edge.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s review count of 191 in the last six months, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, indicates high user satisfaction. Hotels of various sizes, especially B&Bs and vacation rentals, rate it highly for ease of use, support, and features.
Flyhotel, with no reviews or ratings available, cannot be rated by hoteliers. Its lack of user feedback means no comparative data exists for property types or overall satisfaction.
Therefore, eviivo’s proven reputation makes it the preferred choice among hoteliers.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s base price is $700 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees. Its pricing is transparent but premium, reflecting its extensive features and support.
Flyhotel does not disclose pricing details, which could suggest a custom or uncertain pricing model. The absence of pricing information makes direct comparison impossible but raises questions about value and transparency.
Given eviivo’s clear pricing and extensive features, it offers better value for the investment.
Edge: eviivo.
Not ideal if your hotel has minimal online booking needs or prefers a simple, manual system. eviivo’s broad feature set is best for those ready to automate and scale.
Not ideal if your hotel requires proven features, extensive support, or reliability backed by reviews. Flyhotel’s lack of data makes it unsuitable for risk-averse hoteliers.
The core difference is validated performance: eviivo offers a proven, feature-rich platform with recent positive reviews, while Flyhotel’s absence of feedback leaves its capabilities and reliability unverified.
Choose eviivo if your hotel needs a trusted, comprehensive PMS that supports growth, automation, and high guest satisfaction. Its extensive features, support, and proven track record make it the safer and smarter option.
Flyhotel might appeal to small, experimental properties, but without reviews or verified customer success stories, it’s too uncertain for most hoteliers seeking stability and operational excellence.
If your priority is reliability, support, and proven results, eviivo is the clear choice.
According to HTR's product database, eviivo Suite™ PMS and Flyhotel share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide e... Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide exemplary assistance, which is crucial during the onboarding phase and when issues arise, enhancing overall user experience.
The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integrat... The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integration of information and optimal use of the PMS features, enhancing property management efficiency.
Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves o... Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves operational workflow, ensuring a smooth experience for hotel management.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optim... Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optimize business operations and leverage the platform’s capabilities.
While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further... While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further suit specific operational needs and provide additional value.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. eviivo Suite™ PMS and Flyhotel share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. eviivo Suite™ PMS offers 32 verified integration partners, while Flyhotel offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. eviivo Suite™ PMS leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eviivo Suite™ PMS: No. Flyhotel: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eviivo has an HT Score of 87 and Flyhotel has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor