The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 66 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Faundit shines in customer support and onboarding , with exclusive features like Request Management and Lost & Found.
RoomChecking shines , with exclusive features like Mobile Request Dispatching.
Side-by-side ratings based on 66 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 50 | 16 |
After analyzing 66 verified reviews, Faundit users most value its ease of use, guest experience, time-saving automation, while RoomChecking users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Time-Saving Automation
▾
|
|
|
+
Courier and Shipping Preferences
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Inventory and Case Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile App Improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
Cost for Customers
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Housekeeping Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #14 1 reviews | #11 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #9 26 reviews | #15 10 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 11 reviews | #14 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #9 3 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 17 reviews | #13 6 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #7 22 reviews | #12 9 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 17 reviews | #13 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #10 6 reviews | #11 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #19 1 reviews | #16 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #5 42 reviews | #10 15 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #12 0 reviews |
Choosing the right housekeeping management software can dramatically impact your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Faundit by Faundit and RoomChecking by RoomChecking are two prominent options, each claiming to streamline housekeeping, maintenance, and guest services. While Faundit specializes in lost and found management and automates guest coordination and shipping logistics, RoomChecking offers a broader operational platform for managing daily tasks and team accountability. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both products aim to improve communication, task management, and accountability within your teams. Faundit’s focus on property recovery and guest experience contrasts with RoomChecking’s comprehensive operational management. Could your hotel benefit more from a specialized lost property solution or an all-in-one operational platform?
Faundit is designed specifically for managing lost and found processes, automating guest communication, payment, and logistics, making it ideal if your hotel seeks to reduce lost property handling time and costs. RoomChecking, however, is built to oversee housekeeping, maintenance, and guest services through task automation, better suited for hotels needing overall operations management.
Faundit’s user reviews emphasize its ease of use, with a 4.96/5 rating, and high customer support scores, signaling a well-supported platform. RoomChecking scores slightly lower (4.72/5), but reviews highlight its versatility and customizable workflows. Faundit’s 47 reviews, mostly recent, provide a stronger confidence in its current performance.
If your hotel focuses on guest satisfaction through efficient lost property handling, Faundit is the clearer choice. But if your team needs to coordinate multiple operational tasks across departments, RoomChecking may serve you better. Are you prioritizing guest experience or operational oversight?
If your hotel needs a dedicated lost & found management system that automates guest communication, handles shipping logistics, and integrates with existing systems, Faundit is the recommended choice. It’s trusted by over 600 hotels worldwide, with a perfect overall rating of 5/5 and a high likelihood to recommend (98%).
Conversely, if your hotel requires an all-encompassing operations platform that manages housekeeping, maintenance, and guest services across multiple PMS integrations, RoomChecking is the better fit. It offers 12 unique features not found in Faundit, such as automated room assignments, custom checklists, and detailed performance dashboards, catering to properties with complex workflows.
For properties prioritizing guest-facing lost and found management, Faundit’s automation and branding options make it ideal. For hotels seeking a comprehensive operations tool to increase daily efficiency, RoomChecking’s broader feature set and scalability are more suitable.
Faundit boasts a 4.96/5 ease of use rating based on 47 reviews, with users praising its transparent interface and straightforward onboarding process. Many mention that staff quickly adapt to Faundit’s platform, appreciating its simplicity and quick support.
RoomChecking scores slightly lower at 4.72/5, with reviews emphasizing its customizable workflows and real-time updates. Users note that its learning curve can be slightly steeper due to its extensive features, but overall adoption is smooth once trained.
Edge: Faundit. Its higher usability rating and positive recent reviews suggest your team will find it easier to implement and adopt quickly.
Faundit offers 5 shared features, such as request management and package tracking, plus 4 features unique to its platform, including lost & found, payment automation, and branded confirmations. Its focus remains on streamlining lost property and guest communication.
RoomChecking surpasses Faundit with 12 unique features like automated room assignments, custom inspection checklists, deep cleaning scheduling, and performance analytics, alongside shared features. Its broader feature set supports complex operation workflows and detailed task tracking.
Edge: RoomChecking. Its larger array of features caters to more diverse operational needs, making it suitable for hotels with complex daily routines.
Faundit scores a 4.94/5 rating for customer support from 47 reviews, with hoteliers praising its quick, solution-oriented assistance and friendly team. Reviewers highlight how Faundit’s support enhances onboarding and ongoing use.
RoomChecking’s support rating of 4.53/5, based on 16 reviews, reflects positive feedback but indicates room for improvement. Users appreciate the responsiveness but note that support could be more comprehensive during onboarding.
Edge: Faundit. Its higher support rating and more recent, plentiful reviews reinforce confidence in its customer service reliability.
RoomChecking offers integrations with 25 verified partners, including major PMS systems like PMS, Cloudbeds, and RMS, with four shared integrations with Faundit (Mews, Oracle Hospitality, apaleo, Stayntouch). Faundit has six verified integrations, mainly with systems in Europe and Asia.
RoomChecking’s extensive partner network makes it more adaptable for properties with diverse PMS and operational tools. Faundit’s integrations are fewer but sufficient for many European and global hotels.
Edge: RoomChecking. Its larger number of verified integrations offers more flexibility for complex tech environments.
Faundit’s 47 recent reviews average a perfect 5/5, with hoteliers across all segments praising its ease of use, support, and efficiency improvements. Its reviews emphasize its impact on lost & found operations and guest satisfaction.
RoomChecking has 16 reviews rated at 4.67/5, predominantly from boutique and branded hotels, highlighting its versatility and detailed operational control. However, the slightly lower score signals room for refinement.
Edge: Faundit. The higher review count and perfect ratings make it the more trusted choice among hoteliers.
Faundit charges a flat rate of $100 per month without a trial or freemium offering, making its cost predictable. RoomChecking’s base price is $300 per month, with no free trial, reflecting its broader feature set and enterprise focus.
Your decision may hinge on your budget and needs—Faundit’s lower price appeals to hotels seeking a specialized solution with predictable costs, while RoomChecking’s price matches its extensive features.
Hotels that should consider Faundit:
Not ideal if:
Hotels suitable for RoomChecking:
Not ideal if:
Faundit and RoomChecking serve different core needs. Faundit excels as a dedicated lost & found platform with high usability, strong support, and recent positive reviews, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing guest satisfaction and operational automation in this area. RoomChecking, with its extensive feature set and integration options, suits hotels needing a comprehensive operations management system to handle daily tasks, staff coordination, and complex workflows.
If your hotel primarily struggles with lost property processes, Faundit offers a more targeted, easy-to-deploy solution. But for properties aiming to streamline the entire guest service and housekeeping workflow, RoomChecking is the more comprehensive choice.
In summary, for a hotel focused on enhancing guest experience and quick lost & found recovery, Faundit’s the stronger option. For hotels with broader operational needs and complex team management, RoomChecking provides the scalability and features necessary to run efficiently.
Note: This comparison is based on the latest available reviews, ratings, and feature data, with Faundit currently holding a significant advantage in review count and recent feedback.
Housekeeping Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $300/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Faundit and RoomChecking share 5 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Room Assignments | ||
| Automated Task Routing | ||
| Custom Inspection Checklists | ||
| Hotel branded confirmations & recommendations | ||
| Lost & Found | ||
| Mobile Request Dispatching | ||
| Package Management & Tracking | ||
| Performance Analytics Dashboard | ||
| Progress Tracking Dashboard | ||
| Request Management |
Showing top differences. 4 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Faundit is consistently highlighted for its user-friendly interface, making it intuitive for staff to navigate and handle lost and found items seamles... Faundit is consistently highlighted for its user-friendly interface, making it intuitive for staff to navigate and handle lost and found items seamlessly. The platform's ease of deployment and daily use is highly appreciated by hotel staff, streamlining their workflow significantly.
Faundit contributes to improved guest experience by allowing guests to manage their lost items online, creating a smoother and more professional inter... Faundit contributes to improved guest experience by allowing guests to manage their lost items online, creating a smoother and more professional interaction with the hotel staff. This capability helps in enhancing customer satisfaction.
The system's ability to save time by centralizing and automating lost and found procedures is a standout point. By eliminating the need for manual pos... The system's ability to save time by centralizing and automating lost and found procedures is a standout point. By eliminating the need for manual post office trips and easing tracking, Faundit frees up staff time for other tasks, contributing to cost efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
The ability to manage and track lost items, ensuring efficient organization and storage, is remarked upon. Enhancements requested in this area include... The ability to manage and track lost items, ensuring efficient organization and storage, is remarked upon. Enhancements requested in this area include more flexible management tools like archiving completed cases.
There is a desire for a dedicated mobile app that could streamline item registration and management on the move, enhancing efficiency and reducing err... There is a desire for a dedicated mobile app that could streamline item registration and management on the move, enhancing efficiency and reducing errors on the spot.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Faundit and RoomChecking share many core Housekeeping Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Faundit offers 6 verified integration partners, while RoomChecking offers 25. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Faundit leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Faundit: No. RoomChecking: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Housekeeping Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Faundit has an HT Score of 83 and RoomChecking has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor