The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 56 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
FelhőMatrac shines .
Aven Hospitality shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Reporting Dashboard.
Side-by-side ratings based on 56 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 56 |
After analyzing 56 verified reviews, FelhőMatrac users most value its , while Aven Hospitality users highlight ease of use and user experience, connectivity and distribution reach, innovation and technology updates. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| FelhőMatrac |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and User Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Connectivity and Distribution Reach
▾
|
|
|
+
Innovation and Technology Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine Performance
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customer Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
−
Technical Issues and Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | FelhőMatrac |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #11 3 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 26 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 15 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 6 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | FelhőMatrac |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #7 20 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 20 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #4 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | FelhőMatrac |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #6 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #3 6 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 4 reviews |
Choosing between FelhőMatrac by FelhőMatrac and SynXis Central Reservation System by Aven Hospitality hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. FelhőMatrac, a reservation platform with no recent reviews or feature set, appears limited, whereas Aven Hospitality offers a comprehensive, multi-feature system backed by a sizable user base and recent positive feedback. Which platform aligns better with your operational goals?
FelhőMatrac provides basic reservation capabilities but lacks recent user data and integrations, making it difficult to evaluate its effectiveness. In contrast, Aven Hospitality has a proven track record, with over 50 recent reviews and a high user recommendation rate. Given the data, Aven Hospitality is the clearer choice for hoteliers seeking a reliable reservation solution.
FelhőMatrac offers a very limited, almost nonexistent review dataset—no recent reviews, ratings, or detailed feedback—making it impossible to gauge its real-world performance or customer satisfaction. Aven Hospitality, however, boasts 50 reviews in the last six months with an 85% likelihood of recommendation, reflecting current user satisfaction.
While FelhőMatrac seems to lack a distinct feature set or regional presence, Aven Hospitality supports multiple continents, including North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and Africa, giving it a broader global footprint. If your hotel needs a system with active support and proven functionality, Aven Hospitality stands out.
If your hotel requires a simple reservation system with minimal complexity, FelhőMatrac might suffice, but the lack of recent reviews or features makes this uncertain. For hotels seeking a feature-rich platform capable of multi-property management, distribution, and integration, Aven Hospitality provides 16 unique functionalities like RMS and PMS connectivity, channel management, and guest profiles.
For property types prioritizing ease of use, reporting, and connectivity, Aven Hospitality’s extensive feature set and recent positive feedback make it the superior option. FelhőMatrac does not currently demonstrate measurable advantages over Aven Hospitality in any key area.
FelhőMatrac’s user experience is impossible to evaluate due to the absence of recent reviews, ratings, or onboarding data. Conversely, Aven Hospitality has a user rating of 4.38/5, with most reviewers praising its intuitive interface, easy onboarding, and straightforward navigation. It scores highly on ease of use, with a 4.38/5 rating from recent users.
Reviewers mention that Aven Hospitality's platform is “easy to use,” with “seamless navigation” and “quick setup,” indicating a positive staff adoption experience. Edge: Aven Hospitality.
FelhőMatrac offers no documented features, whereas Aven Hospitality provides 16 specialized capabilities, including RMS and PMS connectivity, call center functions, geotargeted pricing, and content management. Its feature count and recent reviews suggest a well-rounded platform tailored for complex hotel operations.
Aven Hospitality’s features are designed to support multi-property management, dynamic pricing, and distribution channels, with reviewers highlighting how these tools save time and improve accuracy. FelhőMatrac does not currently demonstrate a competitive feature set.
There is no recent review data for FelhőMatrac’s customer support or onboarding experience, making evaluation impossible. Aven Hospitality’s support ratings show a 4.07/5 score, with users describing their support as “responsive,” “helpful,” and “proactive,” especially in onboarding and troubleshooting.
Recent reviews praise the support team’s professionalism, although some mention delays in issue resolution. Given the data, Edge: Aven Hospitality.
FelhőMatrac has zero verified integration partners, limiting its connectivity options and potential for seamless data sharing. Aven Hospitality, on the other hand, boasts 80 verified partners, including popular PMS and RMS systems, OTA channels, and other third-party tools.
Shared integrations are nonexistent, but Aven Hospitality’s extensive partner network enables more flexible and scalable hotel management. Edge: Aven Hospitality.
FelhőMatrac has no recent reviews, ratings, or user feedback, so its property segment ratings are unavailable. Aven Hospitality’s reviews indicate an overall hotel rating of 4.2/5, with independent and branded hotels rating it around 4.5/5, especially in recent feedback.
Property types such as independent hotels and brands tend to rate Aven Hospitality higher, reflecting its suitability for diverse hotel segments. Given the recent review activity, Aven Hospitality clearly has stronger user approval.
FelhőMatrac’s pricing model is not disclosed, and it offers no free trial or transparent costs. Aven Hospitality charges a base price of $400 per month, with no mention of hidden fees or tiered pricing, making it easier to compare value.
While FelhőMatrac’s affordability is unclear, Aven Hospitality’s clear pricing allows for better budgeting and ROI assessment, especially considering its extensive features.
Not ideal if… your hotel relies on multi-property management, distribution channels, or advanced reporting.
Not ideal if… your property is very small or only needs basic reservation functionality without integrations.
FelhőMatrac is a reservation platform with no recent activity, reviews, or demonstrated features—making it unsuitable for most hotels looking for proven solutions. Aven Hospitality, with its 50 recent reviews, high user ratings, and 16 features, offers a dependable, scalable system for a broad range of hotel segments.
If your hotel needs a robust, highly connected reservation and management system, Aven Hospitality is the clear choice. FelhőMatrac might suit very small, budget-conscious properties or those experimenting with reservation management but lacks the credibility and features that modern hoteliers demand.
In summary, for hotels wanting recent validation, proven performance, and a feature-rich platform, Aven Hospitality stands out as the better choice. The absence of recent reviews and features makes FelhőMatrac a risky option, especially for hotels aiming for reliable, scalable reservation management.
Hotel Reservations Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| FelhőMatrac |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
According to HTR's product database, FelhőMatrac and SynXis Central Reservation System share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | FelhőMatrac |
|
|---|---|---|
| Availability Management | ||
| Call center functionality | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Geotargeted pricing module | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
| RMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 4 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Many users highlight SynXis CR's intuitive interface and ease of use for managing rates, reservations, and multiple properties. The seamless navigatio... Many users highlight SynXis CR's intuitive interface and ease of use for managing rates, reservations, and multiple properties. The seamless navigation and efficient design make it simple for hoteliers to perform complex tasks with minimal support. Users particularly appreciate the ability to make updates easily across multiple properties, which saves significant time.
Reviewers consistently praise SynXis for its superior connectivity to multiple OTAs and partners, which improves distribution reach and direct channel... Reviewers consistently praise SynXis for its superior connectivity to multiple OTAs and partners, which improves distribution reach and direct channel conversions. The platform offers high reliability and consistent performance for various distribution channels. The integration with PMS and RMS systems is seamless, allowing hoteliers to maintain data integrity across platforms.
Sabre's commitment to continuous innovation is well-received by users, who appreciate the regular updates and new capabilities being introduced to Syn... Sabre's commitment to continuous innovation is well-received by users, who appreciate the regular updates and new capabilities being introduced to SynXis. These updates reflect the company’s dedication to staying ahead of industry trends and addressing evolving customer needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support has a mixed reception; while some users find the support team helpful and responsive, others report significant delays in problem res... Customer support has a mixed reception; while some users find the support team helpful and responsive, others report significant delays in problem resolution and long wait times. Additionally, transitioning towards self-service support options has presented challenges for users needing quick and effective assistance.
While SynXis is recognized for its robust functionality, users express a need for quicker validation of enhancement requests and increased customizati... While SynXis is recognized for its robust functionality, users express a need for quicker validation of enhancement requests and increased customization options, especially for unique property needs. The delay in implementing new features and the limited scope for customization are recurring themes in the reviews.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FelhőMatrac and SynXis Central Reservation System share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. FelhőMatrac offers 0 verified integration partners, while SynXis Central Reservation System offers 80. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SynXis Central Reservation System leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FelhőMatrac: No. SynXis Central Reservation System: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. FelhőMatrac has an HT Score of 0 and Aven Hospitality has 81. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor