The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 28 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
FelhőMatrac shines .
Vertical Booking shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Call center functionality and Geotargeted pricing module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 28 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 28 |
After analyzing 28 verified reviews, FelhőMatrac users most value its , while Vertical Booking users highlight customer service, channel management, seamless integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| FelhőMatrac |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate Shopping
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
User-Friendly
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking Engine
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | FelhőMatrac |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 11 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 5 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #10 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | FelhőMatrac |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #8 13 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #8 11 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #8 5 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #9 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | FelhőMatrac |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #4 17 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #8 6 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #6 1 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #4 4 reviews |
Hotel Reservations Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| FelhőMatrac |
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, FelhőMatrac and Vertical Booking (CRS) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | FelhőMatrac |
|
|---|---|---|
| Availability Management | ||
| Call center functionality | ||
| Cancellation Policies | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Geotargeted pricing module | ||
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates |
What hoteliers love
While many users praise Vertical Booking's customer service for its responsiveness and effectiveness in resolving issues, some reviews indicate a need... While many users praise Vertical Booking's customer service for its responsiveness and effectiveness in resolving issues, some reviews indicate a need for improvement in terms of speed and consistency, particularly for the US market.
The channel management functionality of Vertical Booking received positive feedback for its ease of use and efficiency in handling multiple distributi... The channel management functionality of Vertical Booking received positive feedback for its ease of use and efficiency in handling multiple distribution channels. Users note that it streamlines the process and helps maintain up-to-date rates and availability across all connected channels.
Many users appreciate that Vertical Booking integrates seamlessly with other systems, allowing for smooth synchronization of rates, inventory, and res... Many users appreciate that Vertical Booking integrates seamlessly with other systems, allowing for smooth synchronization of rates, inventory, and reservations. This integration improves efficiency and saves time, especially for managing multiple platforms from a single interface.
Where hoteliers push back
Vertical Booking is frequently described as user-friendly and intuitive, making it easier for hotel staff to manage bookings and rates without extensi... Vertical Booking is frequently described as user-friendly and intuitive, making it easier for hotel staff to manage bookings and rates without extensive training. Despite this, a few users mention that certain features could be more intuitive and simplified.
The booking engine is generally appreciated for its functionality, but several reviews suggest that its interface could be more customizable and moder... The booking engine is generally appreciated for its functionality, but several reviews suggest that its interface could be more customizable and modernized. Users specifically mention the need for better user experiences on mobile devices and more flexibility in setting up discounts and promotions.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FelhőMatrac and Vertical Booking (CRS) share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. FelhőMatrac offers 0 verified integration partners, while Vertical Booking (CRS) offers 69. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Vertical Booking (CRS) leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FelhőMatrac: No. Vertical Booking (CRS): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. FelhőMatrac has an HT Score of 0 and Vertical Booking has 28. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor